[Dev] Transparency

Nicolás Reynolds fauno at endefensadelsl.org
Tue Feb 10 13:07:53 GMT 2015

hellekin <hellekin at gnu.org> writes:

> This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque.  The details
> of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to
> the process that is public otherwise.  It's important to have a record
> of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many voices
> raised during a conversation.

that's why the propposed list was closed to posts.

> More importantly, it's a recipe for disaster.  While you give attention
> to this, you're not working on your own tasks.  The goal is to deliver a
> distro, not to micro-manage the delegate.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 584 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20150210/b007716d/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list