[Dev] [PATCH] libretools: fix i686 gpg signature failures
isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info
Wed Mar 21 06:58:28 GMT 2018
Luke Shumaker wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:51:49 -0400,
> Andreas Grapentin wrote:
>> archlinux32 is building their own arch=(any) packages, which means
>> can't share the same cachedir as the x86_64 built -any packages.
>> patch adds a separate cachedir for each CARCH in librechroot, which
>> should solve the signature issues we have seen in libremakepkg.
> But we don't import arch=(any) packages from archlinux32 anymore, do
> Actually, I don't think we import arch=(any) packages from ALARM
> anymore either.
right, unless it's an original package.
more precisely, Arch's arch=(any) packages may override
existing ALARM or Arch32 pkgnames -- they are given priority
and all architectures are meant to use archlinux-keyring.
i don't expect this scenario to surface often in practice,
since both ALARM and Arch32 follow Arch, not the other way
on the other hand, ALARM and Arch32's arch=(any) packages aren't
allowed to override Arch's arch=(any) stuff, nor each other's.
this is the relevant code:
More information about the Dev