[Dev] [consensus] Features vs. Privacy in nonprism repo

Joshua Haase hahj87 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 19:58:38 GMT 2016

Alejandro Hernández <alejandrohp at openmailbox.org> writes:
> [PCR repo]
> I don't understand why libre-software packages, apparently respectful 
> with user rights and stable are not available for all users. 🤔 That's 
> why I think 'PCR' repository should be activated by default. And if they 
> are unstable packages, they should go into another repo like 
> 'pcr-testing'.


> [nonprism repo]
> Libre Software is not only about a license, but about respect for user 
> rights. That's why we use it and we've all previously decided that 
> rights are before than features. We want to take advantage of such 
> features (like ubication) but not at cost of giving this info to others 
> who use it against users.
> Nonprism packages replace other packages in the same way that libre 
> packages do. So I think 'nonprism' repo should also be activated by 
> default.

If there is a way to use nonprism by default and install the other
version if needed, i'd vote for it to be activated by default.

But this repo active by default and stopping you to use the other
version is too invasive.

More information about the Dev mailing list