[Dev] Let's revert and move changes introduced by bugs #645 and #677 on Iceweasel

[fauno]

Florian Pelz <pelzflorian at pelzflorian.de> writes:

> On 11/04/2015 05:04 PM, fauno wrote:
>> our criteria is the parabola social contract (which you can find on the
>> wiki).
>> 
>
> I want criteria so these political decisions can mostly be made based on
> Parabola policy and not vague ideas and long discussions.
>
> If the Social Contract is all criteria there is for libre, then that
> would allow a) some kinds of non-free "non-functional data" such as not
> fully free art (cf. the Free System Distribution Guidelines [1]) and it
> might also allow b) SaaSS like Firefox Hello. While Stallman describes
> SaaSS as taking away freedom, I fail to see how the FSDG make it
> forbidden, so Hello should be allowed in libre.
>
> The Social Contract also says nothing about nonprism. I think my
> proposed criteria for nonprism are appropriate.

mmm i thought we put it on the social contract that we also support free
culture so non optional non modifiable art/data is not considered ok,
unlike the fsdg does.  (think of cc-nd game art, not gnu fdl covers or
unmodifiable sections...)

where did we point this out?

-- 
http://librevpn.org.ar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 584 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20151105/8f6f8bc4/attachment.sig>