[Dev] [donations] progress with ceata + decisions to be made

[André Silva]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/06/2015 02:25 PM, Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
> 
> * in the case we decide to pay salaries or irregular
> compensations, ceata is prepared to do it.
> 
+1

> * if we'd like Ceata to provide legal counsel too, we'd need to
> talk copyright assignments.  i personally like bkuhn's position on
> this[0] (every contributor is a copyright holder) but it's a
> decision we need to make collectively.
> 
yes, i like bjuhn's position too

> * donations can be received in EUR, USD and RON via bank transfer
> to Ceata's account.  for other methods, they prefer payment systems
> that have free software clients.  apparently paypal can do this,
> and Ceata will work with the FSF to determine which others are
> available.
> 
+1

> * we need to decide how we'll thank them for their support.  we've
> add the supporter logo and a short message on our main page (bottom
> right) in other cases.
> 
+1

> i think the donations page should thank Ceata for their support
> and have a short description on their work (and we can do this on
> a separate page for other kind of supporters, to be fair to them).
> 
+1 and also, my father and coadde are doing a specific GNU character
for the donations page similar than they did for our logo [0].
Otherwise, my father is creating more specific draws about this GNU
character to get a better look at our website.

[0]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/images/3/33/Logotipo_color.png

> they also proppose we add a "with the fiscal support of Ceata 
> Foundation" suffix to our description on the GNU free distros
> list[1], but since there's been arguments against before[2] we need
> to decide on this.
> 
I was against "with institutional support...", but "with the fiscal
support" is OK for me, because fiscal support is very different than
our support made by us inside Parabola.

> i think i've covered everything so far, can we make a decision
> before next friday (2015-03-13)?
> 
yes, but i think that it should be solved before than that day though.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=UcbA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----