[Dev] [donations] follow up on ceata agreement

[André Silva]

On 07/20/2015 05:44 PM, fauno wrote:
> i wouldn't like a solution like this, because it'll create the rift
> between payed hackers and communitary development we discussed and
> feared about a long time ago...  with a project that's more of a
> product, made for professionals for the needs of their costumers, and a
> pet project developed by and for the community that has bugs no one
> wants to fix.
> 
> i **insist** in that if we want to accept money and start covering
> hardware expenses, developer expenses, and then life expenses, we need
> to do it as a community and in transparent way.  having to create a side
> project with funding and dedicated people is not the way to do it :)
> 
> there's people involving a lot of their time in parabola development,
> and after a while it isn't fun anymore (i did it myself!).  i'd be happy
> to see them make a few bucks for that, but those bucks should be
> assigned by the community if this project is going to be democratic and
> fun in the future.
> 

+1 excellent point of view, i didn't paid attention on that detail

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20150720/8485fd37/attachment.sig>