[Dev] [RFC] Voting about package naming for packages modified from Arch
Nicolás Reynolds
fauno at endefensadelsl.org
Sat Aug 30 16:06:37 GMT 2014
Michał Masłowski <mtjm at mtjm.eu> writes:
>> if renaming is cumbersome (after 5 years doing it?) i guess a
>> post_{install,upgrade} note with the reason would be more helpful.
>
> Can we do it via news on parabolagnulinux.org instead? (This would also
> work for changes like removing nonfree packages.) Unless the changes
> require special work after an update and are not interesting for users
> who don't install the affected package.
do both?
--
http://selfdandi.com.ar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 602 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140830/8dad9012/attachment.sig>
More information about the Dev
mailing list