[Dev] [RFC] Voting about package naming for packages modified from Arch

Nicolás Reynolds fauno at endefensadelsl.org
Sat Aug 30 16:06:37 GMT 2014

Michał Masłowski <mtjm at mtjm.eu> writes:

>> if renaming is cumbersome (after 5 years doing it?) i guess a
>> post_{install,upgrade} note with the reason would be more helpful.
> Can we do it via news on parabolagnulinux.org instead?  (This would also
> work for changes like removing nonfree packages.)  Unless the changes
> require special work after an update and are not interesting for users
> who don't install the affected package.

do both?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 602 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140830/8dad9012/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list