[Dev] [RFC] Voting about package naming for packages modified from Arch

[Michał Masłowski]

> if renaming is cumbersome (after 5 years doing it?) i guess a
> post_{install,upgrade} note with the reason would be more helpful.

Can we do it via news on parabolagnulinux.org instead?  (This would also
work for changes like removing nonfree packages.)  Unless the changes
require special work after an update and are not interesting for users
who don't install the affected package.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140830/c7a9e669/attachment.sig>