<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>I didn't mean to respond to you specifically but what do you
mean? To clarify, I meant that if we are bringing the discussion
to whether or not software packages available in the Parabola repo
should recommend/provide access to obtaining non-free cultural
works as its primary purpose then youtube-dl should be considered
as well. While the argument may be made that sites accessible via
youtube-dl do not always provide non-free cultural works, there
are almost certainly some that are. From looking at the list a few
of the following sites make me wonder:</p>
<ul>
<li>Steam</li>
<li>The sites referencing South Park</li>
<li>Sky Sports</li>
<li>Nintendo</li>
<li>Crunchyroll</li>
<li>etc</li>
</ul>
<p>If and when the cultural policy is clearly stated it states that
the decisions to remove OpenRA or patch OpenMW based upon their
ability to access non-free cultural works was justified then to me
it would seem that some similar considerations must be made for
youtube-dl.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 28/09/18 04:14, Josh Branning wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:5BAD9C90.8040006@gmail.com">Theoretically
speaking and following my responses to said questions, the list of
supported sites for youtube-dl probably shouldn't exist in said
package.
<br>
<br>
Josh
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>