<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed;
font-size: 12px;" lang="x-unicode">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">i would not say
that program was ever "permitted" - the issue on the
<br>
bug tracker that you quoted from, exists to evaluate that
program and
<br>
remove if it does in fact include non-free files - these things
<br>
sneak in from arch often and they take time to evaluate - a
little
<br>
non-copyleft artwork is understandably not at the highest
priority
<br>
</blockquote>
Without getting too wrapped up in definitions, from looking at the
old releases of Warsow the license change which permitted
inclusion as a result of the following issue: <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1108">https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1108</a>
is the one that exists between warsow_15 and warsow_20 from the
following archives <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://sebastian.network/warsow/old_releases/">http://sebastian.network/warsow/old_releases/</a>
in which the CC BY-ND is also included. Wikipedia states the
following release dates "June 8, 2014 (version 1.51), November 30,
2015 (version 2.0)" both of which are before the 09/26/2016 date
that #1108 was reported. If you also consider the fact that the
date on the license.txt file (when installing from the repo or the
most recent archive available on the Warsow website) is 26/03/2016
it would appear that it was indeed "permitted" after all.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">for one thing, the
FSDG explicitly forbids leading users directly to
<br>
non-free software - to me, that includes most third-party
package
<br>
managers, AUR helpers, docker/appimage/flatpack/snaps, and so
on; but
<br>
parabola has those, and there is an open issue about removing or
<br>
filtering them - i would say that whatever the decision is
regarding
<br>
those should be carried over to media files as well; but that is
still
<br>
up in the air
<br>
</blockquote>
So would this include programs that enable people to import
assets?
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>