I had two somewhat related bug reports recently. One of made it obvious that the packager wasn't building in a chroot. The second one was for a missing makedepends on a package that was added to the repo less than a day earlier. I figured this one might be from a dirty chroot, but after contacting the maintainer, it turns out he doesn't build in a chroot for "any" architecture packages. So here we have two people packaging for the repos building outside of chroots. Where there's two, there's probably more that just haven't been discovered yet. I inquired about this on IRC and was told there is no written policy, they just thought it was understood by all. Is this then something that's currently left to the maintainer's discretion? Is it policy and just not written? Is it something that should be written policy? Doug