<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Em 02-05-2012 16:44, Nicolás Reynolds escreveu:
<blockquote cite="mid:87y5pa74gj.fsf@kiwwwi.com.ar" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 01 May 2012 02:50:33 -0300, André Silva <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:andre.paulista@adinet.com.uy"><andre.paulista@adinet.com.uy></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Parabolers, i found a lot of libre games that is not are in Archlinux
or Parabola and there are others package included in wrong repos, eg: we
have mednafen-wip on social because don't have repo for it!
So, we open a votation to decide about it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
[...]
Since several have expressed concern about the growing amount of repos
being included, I think it would be best to re-discuss the repo policy.
So far we agreed to have repos per [project] and [~user], though some
propposed to have [parabola-community] or whatever. Do you think
this should be changed? Explain your position, of course.
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Dev@lists.parabolagnulinux.org">Dev@lists.parabolagnulinux.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev">https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
I think that we should to have a new political rules about repos.<br>
<br>
i thought 2 ways:<br>
<br>
1) to have libre, personal repos and parabola-community or a PUR, no
more repos like "artistic", "social", i think that mtjm and others
are right in this point and it is my opinion too.<br>
<br>
or<br>
<br>
2) if we have social, artistic, etc. We should to have repo
categories eg: games, artistic, social.<br>
<br>
but, to have social, artistic, but not other categories like games
and/or others is wrong in my opinion. I prefer the option number 1<br>
</body>
</html>