[Dev] Criteria beyond FSDG compliance for Parabola and third party repositories?

[Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli]

On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:08:52 -0500
bill-auger <bill-auger at peers.community> wrote:

> the difficulty is in how to determine which repos are FSDG
> compliant repositories, when none of them have that as a goal -
> the haskell repo strive to be OSI-compliant - that is perhaps
> close enough - but i expect a very short list in the end:
> 
> * debian
> * guix
> * haskell
> * hyperbola
> * pureos
> * trisquel
> 
> that could be the complete list already

That simplifies things a lot. Thanks a lot. 

Personally I often end up having to use multiple FSDG compliant
distributions for a reason or another[1] while contributing to free
software projects, so I also want to enable other people to relatively
easily use all these distributions if they already use one FSDG
compliant distribution.

References:
-----------
[1]Like deploying infrastructure (Trisquel), building Replicant
   (Specific Trisquel versions), building projects in containers for
   making it easier for contributors (guix), running automatic tests
   (guix), working with Replicant images (Parabola), etc.

Denis.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20221223/20d4d0be/attachment.sig>