From bill-auger at peers.community Sat May 1 00:32:08 2021 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Dev] [abslibre] PR #12: libre/iceweasel: 88.0 update according to upstream In-Reply-To: <20210430010700.5cadd659@parabola.localdomain> References: <20210430003736.2029f3be@parabola.localdomain> <20210430010700.5cadd659@parabola.localdomain> Message-ID: <20210430203208.32207bd4@parabola.localdomain> FWIW, the i686 build does not exhibit either of those problems From grizzlyuser at protonmail.com Sun May 2 11:51:35 2021 From: grizzlyuser at protonmail.com (grizzlyuser) Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 11:51:35 +0000 Subject: [Dev] [abslibre] PR #12: libre/iceweasel: 88.0 update according to upstream In-Reply-To: <20210430003736.2029f3be@parabola.localdomain> References: <20210430003736.2029f3be@parabola.localdomain> Message-ID: <69_UEEMNKBPPSXuumGSectXBTfnhf0nvfDNdxtlEPWMIinD3AyV_WOkfRJy2rQQfwU1veEOTmQOAo8y-sAIjSDLGlywAdLWslPxhA664BlI=@protonmail.com> I wasn't able to reproduce the issue with both my old profile and brand new one (auto-generated after removing ~/.cache/mozilla and ~/.mozilla). Please provide detailed steps to reproduce. It can probably be caused by some non-default preference / extension or simply broken profile. ??????? Original Message ??????? On Friday, April 30, 2021 7:37 AM, bill-auger wrote: > grizzlyuser - > > do you know what these errors may be? - they appear to be > harmless; but i dont like the word "exception" there - it > looks like there is one reported for each installed add-on > > Extension error: Error: tried to detect trackers before rules were loaded moz-extension://84d705af-7194-418f-9d04-8f824f4fc234/public/js/background.js 309 > [[Exception stack > getTrackerData at moz-extension://84d705af-7194-418f-9d04-8f824f4fc234/public/js/background.js:309:23 > handleRequest at moz-extension://84d705af-7194-418f-9d04-8f824f4fc234/public/js/background.js:107107:28 > Current stack > applySafeWithoutClone at resource://gre/modules/ExtensionCommon.jsm:622:13 > fire at resource://gre/modules/ExtensionChild.jsm:806:37 > recvRunListener at resource://gre/modules/ExtensionChild.jsm:810:13 > _recv at resource://gre/modules/ConduitsChild.jsm:78:20 > receiveMessage at resource://gre/modules/ConduitsChild.jsm:184:20 > run at resource://gre/modules/ConduitsChild.jsm:175:30 > receiveMessage/<@resource://gre/modules/ConduitsChild.jsm:176:46 > receiveMessage at resource://gre/modules/ConduitsChild.jsm:176:31 > ]] > > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev From grizzlyuser at protonmail.com Sun May 2 11:56:48 2021 From: grizzlyuser at protonmail.com (grizzlyuser) Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 11:56:48 +0000 Subject: [Dev] [abslibre] PR #12: libre/iceweasel: 88.0 update according to upstream In-Reply-To: <20210430010700.5cadd659@parabola.localdomain> References: <20210430003736.2029f3be@parabola.localdomain> <20210430010700.5cadd659@parabola.localdomain> Message-ID: <_Lv8Wjoxfct0H1GjgHIXXM06jfkeDyAuvRkVsLd0k1_WNuvc5sgTVgUFgQ6NfVvI7O065wWYj8i8hxZHKA2NyT0GEuYP0SQTUl7eej-FMWE=@protonmail.com> For me, this one did work fine too (in KDE Plasma, taskbar was set to use 48x48 icons too). Even after removing and installing iceweasel 1:88.0-1.parabola1 for x86_64 from the official repos. ??????? Original Message ??????? On Friday, April 30, 2021 8:07 AM, bill-auger wrote: > the only bug i noticed so far, is that the taskbar icon > (XDG application icon) is not rendered > > $ find /usr/share/icons/ -name 'ice*' > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/384x384/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/icecat.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/icecat.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/icecat.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/192x192/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/iceweasel.svg > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/iceweasel.png > > $ find /usr/share/pixmaps/ -name 'ice*' > /usr/share/pixmaps/icecat.png > > $ file /usr/share/pixmaps/icecat.png > /usr/share/pixmaps/icecat.png: PNG image data, 48 x 48, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced > > $ file /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/iceweasel.png > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/iceweasel.png: PNG image data, 48 x 48, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced > > copying /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/iceweasel.png to > /usr/share/pixmaps/ did not work > > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev From pagure at pagure.io Fri May 7 07:27:49 2021 From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?Sagar_Acharya?=) Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 07:27:49 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_Issue_=2316=3A_lumina_core_and_co?= =?utf-8?q?re-utils_PKGBUILD?= Message-ID: sagaracharya reported a new issue against the project: `abslibre` that you are following: `` My PKGBUILD is at https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/~~sagaracharya/packages/extra.git/plain/lumina/PKGBUILD lumina-minimal installs the core. lumina-coreutils install the core-utils. desktop-utils are not included (coming soon) Way to install it is to use pacman -S lumina which would install both packages `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/abslibre/issue/16 From pagure at pagure.io Fri May 7 11:28:40 2021 From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?Grizzly_User?=) Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 11:28:40 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_PR_=2312=3A_libre/iceweasel=3A_88?= =?utf-8?q?=2E0=2E1_update_according_to_upstream?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: grizzlyuser commented on the pull-request: `libre/iceweasel: 88.0.1 update according to upstream` that you are following: `` Updated to 88.0.1. I see there's 88.0 in the repos, but abslibre git repo still has 87.0. Built for x86_64 and i686. Didn't try to build for armv7h. It doesn't mean it won't build or work, I just didn't try because it takes lots of time to complete and I afraid my laptop won't be happy about it. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/abslibre/pull-request/12 From bill-auger at peers.community Fri May 7 20:31:57 2021 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 16:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Dev] [abslibre] PR #12: libre/iceweasel: 88.0.1 update according to upstream In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20210507163157.4f763151@parabola.localdomain> yea sry, i forgot to push the changes for v88.0 From nobody at parabola.nu Wed May 12 06:02:51 2021 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 06:02:51 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [gmusicbrowser] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20210512060251.3202982.94091@winston.parabola.nu> lyuutau at outlook.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * gmusicbrowser 1.1.15-6 [pcr] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/armv7h/gmusicbrowser/ * gmusicbrowser 1.1.15-6 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/gmusicbrowser/ * gmusicbrowser 1.1.15-6 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/gmusicbrowser/ The user provided the following additional text: Latest stable version : 1.1.16 (released on 18-11-2020) From nobody at parabola.nu Wed May 12 06:08:23 2021 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 06:08:23 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [ocp] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20210512060823.3202980.49786@winston.parabola.nu> lyuutau at outlook.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * ocp 0.1.21-4 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/ocp/ * ocp 0.1.21-4 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/ocp/ The user provided the following additional text: Out of date From nobody at parabola.nu Thu May 13 08:42:21 2021 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 08:42:21 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan nonsystemd package [eudev] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20210513084221.3202980.64202@winston.parabola.nu> lyuutau at outlook.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: Out of date From pagure at pagure.io Mon May 17 08:45:18 2021 From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?Tyler_Swagar?=) Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 08:45:18 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_PR_=2317=3A_libre/clementine=3A_p?= =?utf-8?q?rotobuf_3=2E16=2E0_rebuild?= Message-ID: commodorecrunch opened a new pull-request against the project: `abslibre` that you are following: `` libre/clementine: protobuf 3.16.0 rebuild `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/abslibre/pull-request/17 From nobody at parabola.nu Sat May 22 09:06:23 2021 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 09:06:23 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [tkpacman] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20210522090623.3202980.41433@winston.parabola.nu> lyuutau at outlook.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * tkpacman 1.8.0-1 [pcr] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/armv7h/tkpacman/ * tkpacman 1.8.0-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/tkpacman/ * tkpacman 1.8.0-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/tkpacman/ The user provided the following additional text: 1 year ago Released /tkpacman-1.9.1/tkpacman-1.9.1.tar.gz From bill-auger at peers.community Sun May 23 04:00:28 2021 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 00:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Dev] gnusocial parabola group was deleted? Message-ID: <20210523000028.16f3790b@parabola.localdomain> does anyone know what happened to the parabola group on gnusocial.net ? - or who created it? - we should probably remove this from the home-page? From megver83 at hyperbola.info Sun May 23 04:04:08 2021 From: megver83 at hyperbola.info (Megver83) Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 00:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Dev] gnusocial parabola group was deleted? In-Reply-To: <20210523000028.16f3790b@parabola.localdomain> References: <20210523000028.16f3790b@parabola.localdomain> Message-ID: <09c51517-bd53-ee6c-fe57-cb3d793d255c@hyperbola.info> I think it was deleted a long time ago. Let's remove it, nobody said anything about its disappearance and the group was (almost) inactive. El 23-05-21 a las 00:00, bill-auger escribi?: > does anyone know what happened to the parabola group on > gnusocial.net ? - or who created it? - we should probably remove > this from the home-page? > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- ~Megver83 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From bill-auger at peers.community Sun May 23 04:39:32 2021 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 00:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Dev] gnusocial parabola group was deleted? In-Reply-To: <09c51517-bd53-ee6c-fe57-cb3d793d255c@hyperbola.info> References: <20210523000028.16f3790b@parabola.localdomain> <09c51517-bd53-ee6c-fe57-cb3d793d255c@hyperbola.info> Message-ID: <20210523003932.73a188be@parabola.localdomain> i was confused (someone gave me the wrong URL) - the group still exists the important thing is whether any of the active devs are watching it - i dont think that any are the matrix channel and reddit are other examples - im not sure if we need to remove them - maybe we could list the matrix channel too; but make it clear that they are community-maintained From bill-auger at peers.community Sun May 23 07:17:50 2021 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 03:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Dev] rationale(s) for parabola to prefer or recommend (any or which) non-parabola-operated network services In-Reply-To: <20210523003932.73a188be@parabola.localdomain> References: <20210523000028.16f3790b@parabola.localdomain> <09c51517-bd53-ee6c-fe57-cb3d793d255c@hyperbola.info> <20210523003932.73a188be@parabola.localdomain> Message-ID: <20210523031750.26d4480c@parabola.localdomain> i generalized the topic to catch the recent freenode controversy - FYI, people have suggested that parabola should join a different IRC network (yes, #parabola is established on the librea network) that exposed a larger issue though, involving several services, which are (arguably) recommended by, but not operated by parabola: * freenode * gnu-social * pagure * reddit * TPPMs and in-app downloaders - mozilla (lang-packs via auto-download vs packages) - the essential "TPPMs" issue whatever the outcome, this would be a good opportunity to re-evaluate which are the "official" recommendations, for each essential networking purpose: [ repo/git , bugs , chat , patches , webby-social-something-new? ] ... (or to argue which of those service classes are "essential") - most importantly for documentation, which hosts are in which class? a few IMHOs: * freenode had a solid rationale; and it remains sound currently * general or support chat would not be on the "essentials" list * perhaps _some_ real-time dev-only channel could be essential (eg: mumble) * anything which is essential, should be self-hosted * any which are non-essential, may be recommended * non-essential services are ideally community-operated * avoid all third-parties, unless explicitly considered to be "community" ... we could also argue which are considered to be "community" as a rough guide, i propose: in precedence, server hosts and hardware donors, (people who actually help parabola) have been somehow denoted publicly (_somehow_) as special "friends of parabola" (or community) if we define "friends of freedom": as those who help parabola in some tangible way, and do so only because parabola is libre software; then other third-parties such as reddit may not be "friends of freedom", where freenode would From nobody at parabola.nu Tue May 25 22:51:23 2021 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 22:51:23 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre-hardened] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20210525225123.3202982.45124@winston.parabola.nu> ugw.ugw at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * linux-libre-hardened 5.11.11.hardened1-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened/ * linux-libre-hardened-docs 5.11.11.hardened1-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-docs/ * linux-libre-hardened-headers 5.11.11.hardened1-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-headers/ The user provided the following additional text: 5.12 is available for both linux-libre and linux-hardened From nobody at parabola.nu Thu May 27 22:35:25 2021 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 22:35:25 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [icecat] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20210527223525.3202981.72144@winston.parabola.nu> thibault.lemoine at protonmail.ch wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * icecat 78.9.0_pre-2 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/icecat/ The user provided the following additional text: Latest version is 78.10.0. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuzilla.git/commit/?id=b72c22186cf381d7b1f93be550c9da30865d03b4