From adminmail at firemail.cc  Thu Dec  2 11:43:00 2021
From: adminmail at firemail.cc (adminmail at firemail.cc)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 11:43:00 +0000
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv-git (a gemini server)
Message-ID: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>

Hello,
After asking for some help on IRC, I finally managed to get a patch 
file.
The package in question comes from the AUR, I did some slight 
modifications to it - and it now compiles with ABSLibre and is tested to 
be working.
I've attached the patch to this email.

-- 
Radioactive Admin <adminmail at firemail.cc>

From bill-auger at peers.community  Thu Dec  2 12:16:09 2021
From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 07:16:09 -0500
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv-git (a gemini server)
In-Reply-To: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
References: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
Message-ID: <20211202071609.658230db@parabola.localdomain>

On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 11:43:00 +0000 adminmail at firemail.cc wrote:
> I've attached the patch to this email.

there is no attachment - it would appear as a link on the website

https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2021-December/008150.html

From bill-auger at peers.community  Thu Dec  2 12:32:47 2021
From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 07:32:47 -0500
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv-git (a gemini server)
In-Reply-To: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
References: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
Message-ID: <20211202073247.0c7a7241@parabola.localdomain>

for completeness toward a new contributor, i should mention that
you could simply paste the raw patch text into the email body -
that is what git send-email does

i am not among them; but most people do not mind getting patches
that way - some people (RMS comes to mind) prefer to see the
patch text directly in the email body, not as an attachment
certainly for small changes

most PKGBUILDs (entire abslibre directories) are very small
files; so it is less important for abslibre, how/where the
changes arrive

From adminmail at firemail.cc  Thu Dec  2 12:38:21 2021
From: adminmail at firemail.cc (adminmail at firemail.cc)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:38:21 +0200
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv-git (a gemini server)
In-Reply-To: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
References: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
Message-ID: <20211202143821.65577640@firemail.cc>

Hello,
Sorry for the interruption.
It seems that web-mail is broken at my provider.
I'm sending it again (this time using claws-mail).
The aforementioned patch is attached to this email.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: add_pkgbuild.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1772 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211202/ff5a0a27/attachment.bin>

From bill-auger at peers.community  Thu Dec  2 13:51:23 2021
From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 08:51:23 -0500
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv-git (a gemini server)
In-Reply-To: <20211202143821.65577640@firemail.cc>
References: <31f72835c3fd7a285f8d30e5937bcff6@firemail.cc>
 <20211202143821.65577640@firemail.cc>
Message-ID: <20211202085123.0ed87469@parabola.localdomain>

ok now that i see it, it raises a few points

it appears that you got the PKGBUILD from AUR - thats good; but
there is one obvious problem with it, as-is - we prefer to avoid
un-pversioned VCS (-git) packages - that PKGBUILD is for the
'gmnisrv-git' package - there is also a 'gmnisrv' PKGBUILD on
the AUR - that is the one parabola would prefer - just upgrade
it to the current upstream release, if/when there is a newer
release available

the "Contributor:" line is missing contact info - all
"Contributor:" must give contact info - that is arch policy
which parabola inherits

if you made no changes to what the AUR maintainer has
done, then you do qualify as a formal "Contributor:" in the
PKGBUILD yet - you could easily become the "Maintainer:" though,
if you added contact info

lastly, in the case of adding new package from the AUR, it was
not so necessary to send the PKGBUILD - AFAIAC, it was already
in a superior form (under git on an arch server) you could have
simply mentioned it's version, and that it compiles successfully
on parabola with no modifications

np, i undersatnd that you are interested in contributing
generally; and were running through the usual steps as an
experience - also excellent :) - the important question to ask
now, is: "are you willing and able to maintain the package into
the future?" - maybe you plan on hosting a gemini site on a
parabola machine, so you would be a user who would notice if it
breaks?

From adminmail at firemail.cc  Thu Dec  2 15:03:55 2021
From: adminmail at firemail.cc (Wael Karram)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:03:55 +0200
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv
Message-ID: <20211202170355.3e0a3c30@firemail.cc>

Hello,
At bill-auger's request I'm also submitting a patch for gmnisrv
(stable).
It is attached to this email.

--
Kind regards,
Wael Karram.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Added-working-libre-PKGBUILD-for-gmnisrv.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1883 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211202/7262b9b2/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211202/7262b9b2/attachment.sig>

From bill-auger at peers.community  Thu Dec  2 19:22:39 2021
From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:22:39 -0500
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmnisrv
In-Reply-To: <20211202170355.3e0a3c30@firemail.cc>
References: <20211202170355.3e0a3c30@firemail.cc>
Message-ID: <20211202142239.0be91f85@parabola.localdomain>

there is a package in pcr-testing - could ppl try it, and verify
that it works properly

i am not impressed with the licensing of this code-base - i see
no indication of the license, other than a GPL file itself -
unlike a permissive license, it is not sufficient to simply drop
a GPL file into a codebase - it must explicitly associated with
some files, somehow - so strictly, i beleive that it is not
licensed at all; because the author reserves the claim that it
was not intended to apply to all portions of the code; because
no part of the codebase states any exceptions to standard
copyright - it just so happens to include a GPL file, for
reasons unknown by any receiver - though it is a petty detail
(the author very likely intended to license it GPL3), parabola
probably should not accept the code-base, as it is

even a vague "all files of the foo project are licensed GPL3 or
later" in the README would be something to base permissiom on;
but usually license headers are added to each source-code file -
if i were to maintain this package, i would ask the upstream to
clarify the licensing somehow - i might even add the license
headers to each source-code file, if the upstream agreed to
accept those changes

otherwise, it is a sensibly small code-base (compiles in
seconds); so it would probably be a relatively easy package to
maintain


From lukeshu at lukeshu.com  Fri Dec  3 02:50:08 2021
From: lukeshu at lukeshu.com (Luke Shumaker)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 19:50:08 -0700
Subject: [Dev] Forward: [GANDI] Registry terms & conditions update for .se
 and .nu
References: <20211018120338.B447BE7CB@mailer4.gandi.net>
Message-ID: <87ee6u8krj.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com>

An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: information at gandi.net
Subject: [GANDI] Registry terms & conditions update for .se and .nu
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:00:00 -0000
Size: 4970
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211202/5a4e8c98/attachment-0001.eml>

From nobody at parabola.nu  Sat Dec  4 02:50:34 2021
From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 02:50:34 -0000
Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre-lts] marked out-of-date
Message-ID: <20211204025034.799071.57500@winston.parabola.nu>

avalos at disroot.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date:


* linux-libre-lts 5.10.72-1 [libre] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/linux-libre-lts/
* linux-libre-lts 5.10.72-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-lts/
* linux-libre-lts 5.10.72-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-lts/
* linux-libre-lts-docs 5.10.19-1 [libre] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/linux-libre-lts-docs/
* linux-libre-lts-docs 5.10.72-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-lts-docs/
* linux-libre-lts-docs 5.10.72-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-lts-docs/
* linux-libre-lts-headers 5.10.72-1 [libre] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/linux-libre-lts-headers/
* linux-libre-lts-headers 5.10.72-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-lts-headers/
* linux-libre-lts-headers 5.10.72-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-lts-headers/


The user provided the following additional text:

Latest LTS kernel release is 5.15.2!


From adminmail at firemail.cc  Sat Dec  4 07:50:27 2021
From: adminmail at firemail.cc (Wael Karram)
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 09:50:27 +0200
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmid
Message-ID: <20211204095027.2d2ad3bc@firemail.cc>

Hello,
After seeing that gmnisrv cannot be packaged for Parabola (since the
licensing status thereof isn't clear).
I have asked bill-auger for advice, and resolved to preparing a
PKGBUILD for gmid - as it is clearly licensed under ISC+BSD (with
proper copyright + license declaration headers in each file).
I've tested this PKGBUILD with libremakepkg, and the daemon works as
expected on my machine.

A slight modification from the upstream AUR package is clearing out all
the website files for the project (not relevant to the
package/software) and removing the contrib/ directory - as the code
there has no copyright or license statements.

I've attached the patchset to this email.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-gmid.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1463 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211204/786ae52f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-gmid.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 880 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211204/786ae52f/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211204/786ae52f/attachment.sig>

From adminmail at firemail.cc  Fri Dec  3 21:07:29 2021
From: adminmail at firemail.cc (Wael Karram)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:07:29 +0200
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmid
Message-ID: <20211203230729.0675ed8d@firemail.cc>

Hello,
I apologize for sending too many emails.
Attached to this email is a patch for a PKGBUILD for gmid:
A sandboxed gemini server written in C and supporting RFC 3987 (with
cgi + fcgi support).
The code is licensed under ISC for the most part.
I have attached two patches to add the PKGBUILD.

--
Kind regards.
Wael Karram.

P.S. This is being sent since gmnisrv doesn't conform to Parabola's
Licensing standards.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-gmid.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1463 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211203/85884904/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-gmid.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 880 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211203/85884904/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20211203/85884904/attachment.sig>

From bill-auger at peers.community  Sat Dec  4 11:08:57 2021
From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger)
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 06:08:57 -0500
Subject: [Dev] PKGBUILD for gmid
In-Reply-To: <20211204095027.2d2ad3bc@firemail.cc>
References: <20211204095027.2d2ad3bc@firemail.cc>
Message-ID: <20211204060857.3ffdcf3a@parabola.localdomain>

there is a packaging request ticket for a gemini server on the
bug tracker - i did not notice it yesterday, but as there is an
open ticket, it would be best to discuss any gemini servers on
that ticket, until something is decided

https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/3124

From nobody at parabola.nu  Sat Dec  4 22:09:52 2021
From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 22:09:52 -0000
Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [blender] marked out-of-date
Message-ID: <20211204220952.799073.69141@winston.parabola.nu>

avalos at disroot.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date:


* blender 17:2.93.5-7.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/blender/
* blender 17:2.93.5-7.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/blender/


The user provided the following additional text:

https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/3.0


From pagure at pagure.io  Wed Dec  8 00:50:01 2021
From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?bill-auger?=)
Date: Wed,  8 Dec 2021 00:50:01 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_PR_=2336=3A_libre/iceweasel=3A_up?=
 =?utf-8?q?date_to_94=2E0_from_upstreams?=
In-Reply-To: <abslibre-pull-request-74f883e15be44315a98a697e566c1413@pagure.io>
Message-ID: <abslibre-pull-request-74f883e15be44315a98a697e566c1413/close/1638924601.0@pagure.io>


billauger closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `abslibre` that you
are following.

Closed pull-request:

``
libre/iceweasel: update to 94.0 from upstreams
``

https://pagure.io/abslibre/pull-request/36

From nobody at parabola.nu  Wed Dec  8 08:16:35 2021
From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification)
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 08:16:35 -0000
Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel] marked out-of-date
Message-ID: <20211208081635.799071.5858@winston.parabola.nu>

list at borfigat.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date:


* iceweasel 1:94.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/iceweasel/


The user provided the following additional text:

Latest upstream Firefox is 95.0


From pagure at pagure.io  Wed Dec  8 22:04:03 2021
From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?Grizzly_User?=)
Date: Wed,  8 Dec 2021 22:04:03 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_PR_=2337=3A_libre/iceweasel=3A_Bu?=
 =?utf-8?q?mp_to_95=2E0?=
Message-ID: <abslibre-pull-request-61f831b6154e46138affd3cbdfd56ac6@pagure.io>


grizzlyuser opened a new pull-request against the project: `abslibre` that you are following:
``
libre/iceweasel: Bump to 95.0
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/abslibre/pull-request/37

From pagure at pagure.io  Fri Dec 10 20:56:53 2021
From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?bill-auger?=)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:56:53 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_PR_=2337=3A_libre/iceweasel=3A_Bu?=
 =?utf-8?q?mp_to_95=2E0?=
In-Reply-To: <abslibre-pull-request-61f831b6154e46138affd3cbdfd56ac6@pagure.io>
Message-ID: <abslibre-pull-request-61f831b6154e46138affd3cbdfd56ac6/close/1639169813.0@pagure.io>


billauger closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `abslibre` that you
are following.

Closed pull-request:

``
libre/iceweasel: Bump to 95.0
``

https://pagure.io/abslibre/pull-request/37

From pagure at pagure.io  Fri Dec 10 20:56:44 2021
From: pagure at pagure.io (=?utf-8?q?bill-auger?=)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:56:44 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Dev] =?utf-8?q?=5Babslibre=5D_PR_=2337=3A_libre/iceweasel=3A_Bu?=
 =?utf-8?q?mp_to_95=2E0?=
In-Reply-To: <abslibre-pull-request-61f831b6154e46138affd3cbdfd56ac6@pagure.io>
Message-ID: <abslibre-pull-request-61f831b6154e46138affd3cbdfd56ac6-163118@pagure.io>


billauger commented on the pull-request: `libre/iceweasel: Bump to 95.0` that you are following:
``
merged
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/abslibre/pull-request/37

From nobody at parabola.nu  Wed Dec 15 10:40:40 2021
From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:40:40 -0000
Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [filesystem] marked out-of-date
Message-ID: <20211215104040.799074.16155@winston.parabola.nu>

grizzlyuser at protonmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date:


* filesystem 2021.01.19-1.parabola1 [libre] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/filesystem/
* filesystem 2021.01.19-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/filesystem/
* filesystem 2021.01.19-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/filesystem/


The user provided the following additional text:

Thank you for maintaining this package! A new version has been released:
https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/commits/packages/filesystem/trunk


From nobody at parabola.nu  Sat Dec 18 02:35:29 2021
From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 02:35:29 -0000
Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel] marked out-of-date
Message-ID: <20211218023529.799071.71590@winston.parabola.nu>

eliotreyna at disroot.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date:


* iceweasel 1:95.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/iceweasel/


The user provided the following additional text:

Firefox source code has been updated to the version 95.0.1. It includes some critical updates related to the WebRender that avoids to crash and bugfix for dark mode in some GUI settings for websites.

For more information, please go to the following link: >> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/95.0.1/releasenotes/

Thanks.


From grizzlyuser at protonmail.com  Sun Dec 19 23:37:37 2021
From: grizzlyuser at protonmail.com (grizzlyuser)
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:37:37 +0000
Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel] marked out-of-date
In-Reply-To: <20211218023529.799071.71590@winston.parabola.nu>
References: <20211218023529.799071.71590@winston.parabola.nu>
Message-ID: <u8tTEnk4aLLppY-XNSt8inUnZg-G3J-wo-nRdIwvZyUF_0HlH7s2l2UQ32_WxqjpgIt6jBc7vZOtezKw0gLYNWtnpmrmb4tkaACJdEknSaU=@protonmail.com>

I had success building 95.0.1 for x86_64 locally with only changes to pkgver and checksums.