[Dev] [PATCH] Iceweasl 77.0.1 update

dllud dllud at riseup.net
Fri Jun 26 21:45:32 GMT 2020


Slightly off-topic, but I decided to reply as I can add a bit more info
about the subjects that bill-auger touched.

On 26/06/2020 21:39, bill-auger wrote:
> to suggest to the user to
> install some phone "app", then that suggestion itself would
> conflict directly with the FSDG; because that would be condoning
> the use of a non-free OS, merely because there are no free OS
> for 99% of those phones - 

It seems that is stretching the FSDG wording a bit too far.
As long as there is at least 1 phone in the world that runs fully free
software and can run that app, then I do not see how the suggestion
could conflict FSDG.
Practically speaking, if you're suggesting an iOS app, I can see a
conflict. On the other hand, if you're suggesting an Android app that
runs on Replicant[1], I would deem it ok.

> IMHO, even f-droid should not be
> suggested formally, despite that it hosts only free software,
> and probably is acceptable by the FSDG; because its mere
> existence suggests the use of a non-free OS, and hopelessly
> non-libre hardware

Actually, in light of the FSDG, F-Droid is not acceptable[2]. It
distributes some apps that:
- promote non-free software;
- depend on non-free software;

F-Droid has this clearly marked as anti-features for those apps, but
that is not deemed to be enough.

Replicant had to refrain from including F-Droid while the proper fix is
still in the making[3][4].

References:
-----------
[1] https://www.replicant.us/
[2]
https://blog.replicant.us/2016/08/replicant-6-early-work-upstream-work-and-f-droid-issue/
[3] https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/-/issues/564
[4] https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1629


More information about the Dev mailing list