[Dev] Plans for nonprism [was neutered geoclue]
theova at bluewin.ch
Thu Feb 6 16:49:24 GMT 2020
Sounds like a plan.
I will try to sort the [nonprism] packages the next days.
Could someone give me more privileges on redmine, so that I can group
issues? My account is "theova" (https://labs.parabola.nu/users/4743).
I think having /usr/share/privacy-enhanced/*.txt may simplify the
activation of the privacy-enhanced repo. This could also force package
maintainers to document the modification of package - never a bad idea.
Freemor <freemor at freemor.ca> schrieb am Tue, 04. Feb 20 08:53:
> This is still ongoing but more slowly due to me having to step back a bit.
>I've most recently bee working through the less popular packages in nonprism
>and been bringing them up-to-date. Darktable is a stumbling block as it now
>olny supports 64 bit code and thus the latest version wont compile for
>1686/armv7h. I haven't had the chance to dig in yet and see if this is an
>actual problem or just something they have stuck in the bre-build checks so they
>don't have to worry about 32 bit clean code.
> In doing the there are some things in nonprism that possibly should be moved to
>libre because the reason for them being in there is disabling third party site
>add-ons (gthumb comes to mind) and isn't not suggesting non-free services under
>the libre/parabola social contract/etc umbrella.
> What would be useful is if you could glance through the PKGBUILDS and compile a
>list of the packages by:
>Only removes geoclue - these we could lose thanks to the neutered geoclue
>Only removes addon or access to non-free service - some of these might be
> candidates for moving to libre
>Actual privacy enhancing - the "hardened" packages/etc. things that actually
> move the privacy bar a bit higher
> What I'm seeing is that nonprism, especially given the name, was probably
>created around the time of the Snowden leaks and some of the things in there
>look a little more reactionary then a well defined curated collection.
> WRT the above. One thing that is needed and that you and others can help with is
>discussion here so create a clear, concise, idea of what should be in
>"privacy-enhanced". By which I'm not meaning actual package but a set of
>guidelines. a la "Things that remove tracking/dialing home". And also what
>kinds of things should not be included because they fall under the umbrella of
>security (we should probably think about a "Security-enhanced" down the road),
>or should be in libre, etc.
> Another thing that would be good is some sort of naming convention so an end
>user can easily see whats "enhanced" like foo-TR-GlR for program foo but with
>tracking removed and geolocation removed. Or could be that each package has a
>.txt file that lives in /usr/shae/doc/privacy-enhanced/ that describes what was
>changed and why.
>On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 09:14:53PM +0100, theova wrote:
>> The point of having a privacy-as-default repository with less
>> maintenance workload is absolutely right for me.
>> What is the current status on this? Is there any help needed?
>> I could investigate, test or build packages.
>> Otherwise I can also look at today's [nonprism] packages and keep them
>> bill-auger <bill-auger at peers.community> schrieb am Sun, 15. Dec 19 21:50:
>> >i like the idea of the name change - it is probably was never
>> >meaningful to most people unless they read the wiki article
>> >first - a concise name like 'privacy' would make its purpose much
>> >more obvious
>> >AFAIK the repo name itself could be changed arbitrarily; but
>> >each of the packages also have ".nonprismN" in the 'pkgrel' - im
>> >not sure why that is necessary (likewise for ".nonsystemdN") -
>> >packages in [libre] and [pcr] do not end with ".libreN" or
>> >in my experience, `pacman -Syu` will not automatically upgrade a
>> >newer version of some duplicated package if it is in a
>> >lower-priority repo - it is absolutely necessary to have the
>> >repos declared in pacman.conf in the expected order of priority
>> >- so, it should be totally sane to drop the special descriptors
>> >".nonprismN" and ".nonsystemdN" from the 'pkgver', and have the
>> >same ".parabolaN", or ".parN" for all packages, right?
>> >maybe im confused about that; but it is common when packaging
>> >with libretools, that some package conflicts arise because some
>> >package needs to be deleted from the local /repo, which
>> >is shadowing the one in the public repos, because of its
>> >priority in the chroot pacman.conf
>> >Dev mailing list
>> >Dev at lists.parabola.nu
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
>Want to send me an encrypted reply?
>Click here: https://hawkpost.co/box/e414d311-bd6a-4429-8e9e-6a690d5ad034
>The rest of my contact details are at:
>Dev mailing list
>Dev at lists.parabola.nu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Dev