[Dev] Which packages go in which repositories?

[Megver83]

In my case, whenever I build a package which does not correspond to
[libre], I put it in [pcr]. Now, you may ask, what goes in [libre]? In
my case, besides the obvious stuff (libre replacements) I also upload
dependencies of [libre] packages (e.g. linux-libre-firmware
cross-compilers), and you can also see Parabola's developers tools and
related stuff.

I've also faced that issue, build Arch packages for ARM which aren't in
ALARM, and in that case I put them in [pcr], because they're not a
[libre] replacement and aren't needed by any [libre] pkgs, at least for ARM.

El 15-04-20 a las 22:17, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> I want to build a Xonotic package for Parabola ARM, that I then upload
> using librerelease, in order to make it available to everyone.
> 
> So I was suggested by Bill Auger to either convince archlinuxarm to
> built it for me, or to add the Xonotic PKGBUILD in pcr.
> 
> As before the discussion I thought that the PCR repository was meant
> for PKGBUILDs that would be imported from AUR and potentially modified,
> and not for packages that don't fit in all other repositories, it
> triggered a discussion on which packages should go where.
> 
> I was asked to start a thread about that on the mailing list.
> 
> According to Bill Auger, there is also different understanding of what
> should go in libre.
> 
> Denis.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20200415/46743bb9/attachment.sig>