[Dev] Parabola stance on game assets
pribib at bluehome.net
Fri Sep 28 03:32:34 GMT 2018
I didn't mean to respond to you specifically but what do you mean? To
clarify, I meant that if we are bringing the discussion to whether or
not software packages available in the Parabola repo should
recommend/provide access to obtaining non-free cultural works as its
primary purpose then youtube-dl should be considered as well. While the
argument may be made that sites accessible via youtube-dl do not always
provide non-free cultural works, there are almost certainly some that
are. From looking at the list a few of the following sites make me wonder:
* The sites referencing South Park
* Sky Sports
If and when the cultural policy is clearly stated it states that the
decisions to remove OpenRA or patch OpenMW based upon their ability to
access non-free cultural works was justified then to me it would seem
that some similar considerations must be made for youtube-dl.
On 28/09/18 04:14, Josh Branning wrote:
> Theoretically speaking and following my responses to said questions,
> the list of supported sites for youtube-dl probably shouldn't exist in
> said package.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dev