[Dev] Parabola stance on game assets

[Josh Branning]

Theoretically speaking and following my responses to said questions, the 
list of supported sites for youtube-dl probably shouldn't exist in said 
package.

Josh

On 28/09/18 04:10, pribib wrote:
> One should probably also consider youtube-dl. Looking at the extensive
> list of sites http://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/supportedsites.html I
> would not think it unreasonable to presume that there are sites on this
> list who only provide access to video files that are not free culture,
> and so should be patched out or removed.
>
>
> On 28/09/18 03:44, Josh Branning wrote:
>> On 28/09/18 03:41, Josh Branning wrote:
>>> oops, #3 should have been OK, so long as it doesn't link or include
>>> them.
>>
>> so should have #2 so long as it doesn't link or include them.
>>
>>
>> ... I will try again
>>
>> My own questions:
>>
>> 1) NOT OK
>> 2) NOT OK
>>
>> Your questions
>>
>> 1) NOT OK
>> 2) OK so long as it doesn't link or include non-free assets
>> 3) OK so long as it doesn't link or include non-free assets
>>
>> ... basicimally. :/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev