[Dev] Parabola stance on game assets

[Josh Branning]

Re. the questions; I was going under the assumption that if it's not OK 
it shouldn't be included in parabola.

On 28/09/18 03:18, pribib wrote:
> Perhaps the following?
>
> 1) OK or NOT OK to include non-free assets. (e.g. Warsow)
>   ... and ...
> 2) OK or NOT OK to provide programs whose primary purpose are to obtain
> non-free assets. (e.g. OpenRA)
>
> 3) OK or NOT OK to provide programs whose primary purpose are to make
> use of non-free assets. (Whether this be importing into a game engine or
> something else, e.g. OpenMW)
>
>
> While a program like wget may be able to "import assets" it should not
> be compared to programs whose primary reason for existence is to import
> non-free assets.
>
>
> On 28/09/18 03:12, Josh Branning wrote:
>>> I strongly urge other developers to make their opinions known as to
>>> where the line should be drawn.
>>
>> Probably a consensus needs to be reached about
>>
>> Whether it's ...
>>
>> 1) OK or NOT OK to include non-free assets.
>>  ... and ...
>> 2) OK or NOT OK to link to non-free assets.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev