From nobody at parabola.nu Sat Dec 1 14:00:32 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 14:00:32 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [openshot] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181201140032.1418.2833@winston.parabola.nu> No0n3Left at openwebmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * openshot 2.4.2-2.parabola1 [libre] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/openshot/ * openshot 2.4.2-2.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/openshot/ * openshot 2.4.2-2.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/openshot/ The user provided the following additional text: The newest version is 2.4.3 From nobody at parabola.nu Sat Dec 1 14:00:58 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 14:00:58 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [openshot] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181201140058.1419.11775@winston.parabola.nu> No0n3Left at openwebmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: The newest version is 2.4.3 From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Dec 4 14:42:52 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 14:42:52 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [linphone] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181204144252.1419.80469@winston.parabola.nu> grizzlyuser at protonmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * linphone 3.12.0-1 [pcr] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/armv7h/linphone/ * linphone 3.12.0-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/linphone/ * linphone 3.12.0-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/linphone/ The user provided the following additional text: Although some links on their website and in GitHub mirror show the version 3 is still latest, it seems they are not creating tags and there is new version 4: http://www.linphone.org/news/55/26/Linphone-4-0-for-desktop-platforms-is-available.html http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/linphone-developers/2017-06/msg00046.html Also available in the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linphone-desktop-all/ From megver83 at hyperbola.info Wed Dec 5 01:07:21 2018 From: megver83 at hyperbola.info (Megver83) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 22:07:21 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [linphone] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20181204144252.1419.80469@winston.parabola.nu> References: <20181204144252.1419.80469@winston.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <9459d13e-d823-ae95-1bf9-af7a8f425ce1@hyperbola.info> El 04/12/18 a las 11:42, Parabola Website Notification escribi?: > grizzlyuser at protonmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: > > > * linphone 3.12.0-1 [pcr] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/armv7h/linphone/ > * linphone 3.12.0-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/linphone/ > * linphone 3.12.0-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/linphone/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > Although some links on their website and in GitHub mirror show the version 3 is still latest, it seems they are not creating tags and there is new version 4: > > http://www.linphone.org/news/55/26/Linphone-4-0-for-desktop-platforms-is-available.html > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/linphone-developers/2017-06/msg00046.html > > Also available in the AUR: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linphone-desktop-all/ > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > I know about this, in fact I tried to upgrade it some months ago, but the building failed -- ~Megver83 SIP: megver83 at sip.linphone.org XMPP: megver83 at jabjab.de Tox: megver83 at toxme.io GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 GNUSocial: @megver82 at quitter.cl Diaspora*: megver83 at diasp.org Matrix: @Megver83:matrix.org PixelFed: pixelfed.social/Megver83 PeerTube: peertube.xtenz.xyz/accounts/megver83 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From andreas at grapentin.org Sun Dec 9 07:57:30 2018 From: andreas at grapentin.org (Andreas Grapentin) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 08:57:30 +0100 Subject: [Dev] Parabola ppc64le mkinitcpio In-Reply-To: <874lc7zii1.fsf@librepanther.com> References: <87in0p9tr4.fsf@librepanther.com> <874lc7zii1.fsf@librepanther.com> Message-ID: <20181209075730.GA19317@parabola-pocket.localdomain> Hi, sorry for taking a long time to reply. Is this still an issue on ppc64le? -A On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 08:44:22PM +0100, Bruno Cichon wrote: > Can I get some help with this problem? > > Bruno Cichon writes: > > > Hi when I try to run "mkinitcpio -p linux-libre" I get: > > > > ==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-libre.preset: 'default' > > -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-libre -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-libre.img > > ==> ERROR: invalid kernel specified: `/boot/vmlinuz-linux-libre' > > ==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-libre.preset: 'fallback' > > -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-libre -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-libre-fallback.img -S autodetect > > ==> ERROR: invalid kernel specified: `/boot/vmlinuz-linux-libre' > > > > I don't know how to fix it. > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Dec 13 05:20:53 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 05:20:53 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [claws-mail] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181213052053.1417.27041@winston.parabola.nu> ugw.ugw at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: The current claws-mail version is 3.17.1. From nobody at parabola.nu Fri Dec 14 01:11:04 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:11:04 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [guix] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181214011104.1419.75937@winston.parabola.nu> leahwangui at pm.me wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * guix 0.15.0-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/guix/ * guix 0.15.0-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/guix/ The user provided the following additional text: 0.16 is out From nobody at parabola.nu Fri Dec 14 13:33:05 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:33:05 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [psensor] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181214133305.1417.13586@winston.parabola.nu> grizzlyuser at protonmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * psensor 1.2.0-5.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/psensor/ * psensor 1.2.0-5.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/psensor/ * psensor-debug 1.2.0-5.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/psensor-debug/ The user provided the following additional text: Thanks for maintaining this package! It seems the package needs to be rebuilt against new libsensors.so.5. Currently it doesn't launch, just complains to the stdout: > psensor: error while loading shared libraries: libsensors.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Arch has rebuilt their package already. From bill-auger at peers.community Fri Dec 14 20:31:36 2018 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Dev] iceweasel/abrowser/gnuzilla/ collaboration Message-ID: <20181214153136.337b1b7a@parabola> it has been discussed on the IRC, a plan to collaborate more closely with gnuzilla to unify the patches across these browsers, and to discuss solutions to any new tricks and/or anti-features that mozilla throws at us - this would, presumably, reduce redundant efforts, and at the same time, provide a nice reference for other distros that patch firefox per the FSDG ideally, this would make iceweasel and abrowser essentially the same browser with different branding - in reality, they are very similar already; but this unification would serve to codify precisely which changes are necessary to meet the FSDG, and what are some sensible privacy-related defaults the lead developer of gnuzilla was cool with the idea (he said it would actually be a good opportunity to review and discard any unnecessary patching), and when i suggested a new mailing list, he showed me there was already a 'gnuzilla-dev' mailing list[1] - that is currently used only for automated notices; but those will be stopped in order to use that list for these discussions anyone who is interested in packaging icecat or iceweasel (or may someday be the one relegated to that dubious task), and anyone who may like to voice their opinion (aka. bike-shed) about which features should be enabled or disabled, what the home page should look like, what is the default search engine, etc is encouraged to subscribe to that list [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuzilla-dev From bill-auger at peers.community Sun Dec 16 06:45:15 2018 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 01:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Dev] [staff@dotsrc] parabola mirror In-Reply-To: References: <20181214044827.47763d4a@parabola> Message-ID: <20181216014515.24e07b71@parabola> awesome - i will CC this to the parabola dev list On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 15:38:17 +0100 Anders Trier Olesen wrote: > Hi! > > Check out: > http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ > https://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ > ftp://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ > rsync://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ > > We pull once every 6 hours. Initial sync is already done. > > - Anders > staff @ dotsrc.org > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:48 AM bill-auger wrote: > > > > hello, i just read your message to the GNU Ring mailing list - if > > you > > would like to mirror the parabola repos, that would be swell - it is > > currently about 200GB total - that represents approximately 65GB per > > architecture (x86_64, i686, and ARMv7); though there are two more in > > the works (riscv64 and ppc64le) so this could increase accordingly > > in the future > > > > there is an rsync script on the wiki: > > > > https://wiki.parabola.nu/Creating_a_mirror#Bash_script From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Dec 20 00:57:35 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:57:35 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre-hardened] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181220005735.1416.55841@winston.parabola.nu> ugw.ugw at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * linux-libre-hardened 4.19.8.a_gnu-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened/ * linux-libre-hardened-docs 4.19.8.a_gnu-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-docs/ * linux-libre-hardened-headers 4.19.8.a_gnu-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-headers/ The user provided the following additional text: Version 4.19.10 is available for both the libre kernel and the hardened patch. From bill-auger at peers.community Tue Dec 25 08:32:57 2018 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 03:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Dev] openrc install tutorial Message-ID: <20181225033257.68829bff@parabola> parabola's init ecosystem has been in a state of flux since the beginning with multiple devs working on it in different directions; which has made it difficult to avois confusion in the openrc wiki tutorial - it has been a long time coming; but we seem to be homing in on a standard procedure/configuration; so this is a good time to get the documentation nailed down as to remove as much confusion as possible, once and for all (and that is not to mention the confusion with the udev and consolekit/elogind options) - i did some experiments today to try de-tangling the general install procedure for myself which raised some very obvious questions - i added them to the open discussion on the bug tracker - anyone with a good knowledge of the currnt state of openrc support, please do address these questions so we can make the package/repo naming semantics and the wiki procedure as clear and robust as possible see especially, notes 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/2026?next_issue_id=2122#note-8 From libre at josealberto4444.com Wed Dec 26 22:47:35 2018 From: libre at josealberto4444.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Alberto?=) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 23:47:35 +0100 Subject: [Dev] openrc install tutorial In-Reply-To: <20181225033257.68829bff@parabola> References: <20181225033257.68829bff@parabola> Message-ID: Hi, On 2018-12-25 09:32, bill-auger wrote: > see especially, notes 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 About note 8: all those packages are installed, I think, due to a bug in installation from the iso you used. If you use the openrc-cli-dual-complete iso, you will not have them installed. I tested from openrc-cli-x86_64-netinstall iso (I was going to report it when I saw this email) and I get all these packages installed: systemd systemd-libsystemd systemd-nss-systemd systemd-nss-myhostname systemd-nss-mymachines systemd-nss-resolve libsystemd systemd-common And I think it shouldn't be the case, as there aren't any systemd packages in an installation from the openrc-cli-dual-complete iso. > so we > can make the wiki procedure as > clear and robust as possible I think we can already clarify some procedures in the installation guide (as setting hostname when using openrc, for example), in particular this paragraph: > 5 Service management > > Parabola GNU/Linux-libre uses a:systemd as init, which is a system and > service manager for Linux. For maintaining your Parabola > GNU/Linux-libre > installation, it is a good idea to learn the basics about it. > Interaction > with systemd is done through the systemctl command. Read > a:systemd#Basic > systemctl usage for more information. that should also be added a link to openrc wiki page. I can add notes about setting the hostname, keymap and change that paragraph, and submit it to the wiki, if you all agree with that. Jos? Alberto From libre at josealberto4444.com Wed Dec 26 23:09:05 2018 From: libre at josealberto4444.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Alberto?=) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:09:05 +0100 Subject: [Dev] Installation guide change (Add a user) Message-ID: <26b57134b26b60fe831adea642a2f78f@josealberto4444.com> Hi, I think this step # USERNAME='your-username-here' # PASSWORD='your-password-here' # useradd -m -g users -G "wheel" -s /bin/bash -p $(openssl passwd $PASSWORD) $USERNAME should be changed as setting the password like that can lead to the password written in shell history in plain text. I think this would be better (and simpler): # USERNAME='your-username-here' # useradd -m $USERNAME # passwd $USERNAME May I change the installation guide wiki page with it? Jos? Alberto From bill-auger at peers.community Wed Dec 26 23:14:55 2018 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 18:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Dev] openrc install tutorial In-Reply-To: References: <20181225033257.68829bff@parabola> Message-ID: <20181226181455.70c60045@parabola> yes i used the openrc-cli-x86_64-netinstall ISO - i dont know why the result would be different but the openrc ISOs were rebuilt this week, so maybe that point is already resolved - i will try again with the new ones From bill-auger at peers.community Wed Dec 26 23:50:01 2018 From: bill-auger at peers.community (bill-auger) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 18:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Dev] Installation guide change (Add a user) In-Reply-To: <26b57134b26b60fe831adea642a2f78f@josealberto4444.com> References: <26b57134b26b60fe831adea642a2f78f@josealberto4444.com> Message-ID: <20181226185001.78582217@parabola> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:09:05 +0100 Jos? wrote: > setting the password like that can lead to the > password written in shell history in plain text. good eye, Jos? On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:09:05 +0100 Jos? wrote: > May I change the installation guide wiki page with it? yeah! - thats why it is a wiki - everyone is free to edit it - no one needs to ask permission - some critical pages are protected so that only admins can edit them; but that one is not - if ever someone makes an edit to an important article that is incorrect or bad advice, someone else will just revert it - es no problemo From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Dec 27 00:17:29 2018 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:17:29 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [retroarch] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20181227001729.16228.3304@winston.parabola.nu> cbx130 at protonmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * retroarch 1.7.3-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/retroarch/ * retroarch 1.7.3-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/retroarch/ The user provided the following additional text: Retroarch is at version 1.7.5. Please update whenever you can. Thank you From ovruni at gnu.org.pe Thu Dec 27 06:27:02 2018 From: ovruni at gnu.org.pe (Omar Vega Ramos) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 01:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Dev] [staff@dotsrc] parabola mirror In-Reply-To: <20181216014515.24e07b71@parabola> References: <20181214044827.47763d4a@parabola> <20181216014515.24e07b71@parabola> Message-ID: <96910234-1a93-f75f-937b-8fca9c30cbf1@gnu.org.pe> https://www.parabola.nu/mirrors/mirrors.dotsrc.org/ El 16/12/18 a las 01:45, bill-auger escribi?: > awesome - i will CC this to the parabola dev list > > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 15:38:17 +0100 Anders Trier Olesen wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Check out: >> http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ >> https://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ >> ftp://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ >> rsync://mirrors.dotsrc.org/parabola/ >> >> We pull once every 6 hours. Initial sync is already done. >> >> - Anders >> staff @ dotsrc.org >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:48 AM bill-auger wrote: >>> >>> hello, i just read your message to the GNU Ring mailing list - if >>> you >>> would like to mirror the parabola repos, that would be swell - it is >>> currently about 200GB total - that represents approximately 65GB per >>> architecture (x86_64, i686, and ARMv7); though there are two more in >>> the works (riscv64 and ppc64le) so this could increase accordingly >>> in the future >>> >>> there is an rsync script on the wiki: >>> >>> https://wiki.parabola.nu/Creating_a_mirror#Bash_script > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- Omar Vega Ramos GPG ID: 6D5DBA58 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: