[Dev] [RFC] [libretools] To --armor or --no-armor package signatures?

[fauno]

Luke Shumaker <lukeshu at lukeshu.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I was cleaning up some code in libretools, and I noticed that
> librerelease passes --armor to GPG when creating package signatures.
> This is at odds with `makepkg --sign` passing --no-armor to GPG.

mmm which ones are lighter in bytes?  i think armored signatures are
only useful for email transport?

-- 
:D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 617 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170525/7e54d743/attachment.sig>