[Dev] libglvnd: OK or not?

André Silva emulatorman at riseup.net
Fri Mar 31 08:37:31 GMT 2017

On 03/31/2017 08:17 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 08:04 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 03:13:23 -0400,
>> André Silva wrote:
>>> It's my suggestion:
>>> a) Keep official Arch's mesa (with libglvnd support) unblacklisted.
>>> b) Use coadde's version as alternative one with another name in PCR (eg.
>>> mesa-vanilla)
>> I like that.
> Yes, i think it is the best way for everyone :)

I forgot about drirc that contains support (maybe an "implicit"
recommendation too) to use non-Free Software.[0] I think it's enough to
warrant keeping libre/mesa :(


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170331/af6ea35c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list