[Dev] Fwd: Re: Article: Chromium's subtle freedom flaws

[David Pizarro]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

That's a good idea, but what about Iridium? maybe we could fork it,
and make a replacement for QTWebengine, which can also be used for
other libre distros.

Now QTWebengine will be blacklisted?

El 06/03/17 a las 21:13, Luke escribió:
> On 03/07/2017 12:08 AM, fauno wrote:
>> André Silva <emulatorman at riseup.net> writes:
>> 
>>> Per Richard Stallman, we are removing QTWebengine. It is the
>>> entire Chromium browser, which is non-free.
>> what are those subtle flaws?
>> 
> The article hasn't been published yet, it should be announced on
> FSF soon.
> 
> TL; DR: Hundreds of line of minified js, non-free plugins, DRM, 
> hard-coded connections to Google.com, and privacy leaks. Stallman
> recommended that someone should make a fork similar to GNUIcecat
> for Chromium to address these issues, patching is not enough.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list 
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu 
> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEErCbv92SojUTThXEpQKKthCTeGvMFAli+seAACgkQQKKthCTe
GvMUXQf/W4dDwmFEbDipPRja9Ifh3d98LcbP0QyM+YEhuZeelJgLRlEZl/H7jnW2
dRkQdeFevj7ZvydkbUMo7rdoHIt58e2NLZACmoCNgi1CWsupGO00HHkoBCqV/Dzm
5zBUFP8YtNBQubCQu7JhIsCY/Si6VQao25g02WZb/zWfZhcyRaTAL2a1fn0G5ovI
E/X2laM1Vs1mEFspYbiRNznBIQllVMC2d9mw721SKfww1dQXVXTapFvepKk5VNzj
Wt9ATkZHOAdxLaRK2HcYZiYUH9LnCx1gxOzxGHTulwYytjwnvb2moyLsyQq8yRYQ
7hmzT3raRuU2Hx3pvOerVPMkiun+ag==
=Djtl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----