From emulatorman at hyperbola.info Thu Jun 1 09:43:57 2017 From: emulatorman at hyperbola.info (=?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Silva?=) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:43:57 +0000 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: Deprecation of i686 In-Reply-To: <8d4b090c-ad43-9339-7f91-861da3520074@openmailbox.org> References: <752b4a3d-9d37-a70d-1335-1f084593fd75@openmailbox.org> <20170530163338.GA19406@parabola-pocket.localdomain> <8d4b090c-ad43-9339-7f91-861da3520074@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <9c8aacb9-fb20-f1e6-6e6e-ab75431ebfb5@hyperbola.info> On 05/30/2017 05:43 PM, Megver83 wrote: > El 30/05/17 a las 12:33, Andreas Grapentin escribi?: >> what are the hyperbola guys doing about this? I assume since they are an >> lts distribution, they will maintain i686 support? > > Good question, I'm Cc'ing them Yes, we will maintain i686 support since we are a LTS distribution that is a different case than Parabola. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Thu Jun 1 19:38:25 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Update people's website and In-Reply-To: <20170517125557.GC3671@parabola-pocket.localdomain> References: <5a1950e0-160e-e50c-8057-362b9217ace4@openmailbox.org> <87poff884p.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> <20170517125557.GC3671@parabola-pocket.localdomain> Message-ID: <79d2a669-3d62-e43c-d163-4db33822362a@openmailbox.org> I'm bringing back this topic, so it doesn't get forgotten. I still do not see the new people in the hackers and support stuff websites, neither the ex-hackers in hacker fellows. BTW, why is oaken-source in the labs but not heckyel? Also, remove Jorginho since he also left. El 17/05/17 a las 08:55, Andreas Grapentin escribi?: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:13:10PM -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: >> On Wed, 10 May 2017 21:02:33 -0400, >> Megver83 wrote: >>> *Add the new hackers to labs so that anyone can assign them (or they >>> can self-assign) any task related to packages, for example. >> >> TODO > > ping :) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From andreas at grapentin.org Thu Jun 1 19:53:43 2017 From: andreas at grapentin.org (Andreas Grapentin) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:53:43 +0200 Subject: [Dev] Update people's website and In-Reply-To: <79d2a669-3d62-e43c-d163-4db33822362a@openmailbox.org> References: <5a1950e0-160e-e50c-8057-362b9217ace4@openmailbox.org> <87poff884p.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> <20170517125557.GC3671@parabola-pocket.localdomain> <79d2a669-3d62-e43c-d163-4db33822362a@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <20170601195343.GA22384@parabola-pocket.localdomain> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:38:25PM -0400, Megver83 wrote: > I'm bringing back this topic, so it doesn't get forgotten. I still do > not see the new people in the hackers and support stuff websites, > neither the ex-hackers in hacker fellows. BTW, why is oaken-source in > the labs but not heckyel? IIRC, I created the labs account myself, and pestered Luke until he gave me elevated permissions :) -A -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joseph at xylon.me.uk Sat Jun 3 11:34:08 2017 From: joseph at xylon.me.uk (Joseph Graham) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:34:08 +0100 Subject: [Dev] pbot "hacked" lol Message-ID: <20170603113408.GA697@avalon-parabola.home> This morning user_trisquel[0] found a way to exploit pbot's factoid system to send messages to any channel or user. He then made a "FUCK YOU" factoid and spammed the channel and many users with it. I switched pbot off now but he'll be back online once I secure him up. [0] user_trisquel!~user at 37-41-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net -- Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. I have a blog: http://www.naughtycomputer.uk/ I write software: https://www.suckmore.uk/ I run a web forum: https://www.freesoftwareuk.org.uk/ And a platform for Free Software success stories: http://www.freedcomputer.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joseph at xylon.me.uk Sat Jun 3 18:59:28 2017 From: joseph at xylon.me.uk (Joseph Graham) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 19:59:28 +0100 Subject: [Dev] pbot "hacked" lol In-Reply-To: <20170603113408.GA697@avalon-parabola.home> References: <20170603113408.GA697@avalon-parabola.home> Message-ID: <20170603185928.GB697@avalon-parabola.home> pbot secured and back online -- Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alejandrohp at openmailbox.org Sun Jun 4 19:28:05 2017 From: alejandrohp at openmailbox.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Alejandro_Hern=c3=a1ndez_Petermann?=) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:28:05 +0200 Subject: [Dev] [FreefileSync] New version available: 9.1 Message-ID: <97299389-8aef-5e79-7ef3-1ccc3ba8c1ea@openmailbox.org> [FreefileSync] New version available: 9.1 From nobody at parabola.nu Sun Jun 4 20:31:50 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 20:31:50 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kodi] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170604203150.1073.55866@proton.parabola.nu> reg_+parabola at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kodi 17.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kodi/ * kodi 17.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kodi/ The user provided the following additional text: 17.3 is out: https://kodi.tv/article/kodi-v173-minor-bug-fix-and-security-release From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sun Jun 4 23:00:34 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 19:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Dev] [FreefileSync] New version available: 9.1 In-Reply-To: <97299389-8aef-5e79-7ef3-1ccc3ba8c1ea@openmailbox.org> References: <97299389-8aef-5e79-7ef3-1ccc3ba8c1ea@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: Why didn't you better marked it as out-of-date? El 04/06/17 a las 15:28, Alejandro Hern?ndez Petermann escribi?: > [FreefileSync] New version available: 9.1 > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Sun Jun 4 22:59:43 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 22:59:43 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [freefilesync] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170604225943.1073.48713@proton.parabola.nu> megver83 at parabola.nu wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * freefilesync 8.5-0 [pcr] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/armv7h/freefilesync/ * freefilesync 8.9-0.1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/freefilesync/ * freefilesync 8.9-0.1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/freefilesync/ The user provided the following additional text: New version available 9.1 From alejandrohp at openmailbox.org Mon Jun 5 23:14:27 2017 From: alejandrohp at openmailbox.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Alejandro_Hern=c3=a1ndez_Petermann?=) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 01:14:27 +0200 Subject: [Dev] [SMPlayer] marked out-of-date Message-ID: alejandrohp at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * smplayer 17.5.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://www.parabola.nu/packages/libre/i686/smplayer/ * smplayer 17.5.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://www.parabola.nu/packages/libre/x86_64/smplayer/x86_64 * smplayer 16.9.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (armv7h): https://www.parabola.nu/packages/libre/armv7h/smplayer/ The user provided the following additional text: Versi?n disponible: 17.6.0.8580 From aurelien at hackers.camp Tue Jun 6 06:15:01 2017 From: aurelien at hackers.camp (aurelien) Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 08:15:01 +0200 Subject: [Dev] pbot "hacked" lol In-Reply-To: <20170603185928.GB697@avalon-parabola.home> (Joseph Graham's message of "Sat, 3 Jun 2017 19:59:28 +0100") References: <20170603113408.GA697@avalon-parabola.home> <20170603185928.GB697@avalon-parabola.home> Message-ID: <87d1ahwska.fsf@hackers.camp> Joseph Graham writes: > pbot secured and back online Congratulations Joseph! -- aurelien From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 6 18:14:30 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 18:14:30 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [khotkeys] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170606181430.1073.54699@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * khotkeys 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/khotkeys/ * khotkeys 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/khotkeys/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.10.1 From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 6 18:15:04 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 18:15:04 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kinfocenter] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170606181504.1072.16833@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kinfocenter 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kinfocenter/ * kinfocenter 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kinfocenter/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.10.1 From alejandrohp at openmailbox.org Tue Jun 6 21:53:39 2017 From: alejandrohp at openmailbox.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Alejandro_Hern=c3=a1ndez_Petermann?=) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 23:53:39 +0200 Subject: [Dev] [shotcut] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <3729a54b-68d0-75bd-3cd3-8e73bbc4c7e0@openmailbox.org> alejandrohp at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * shotcut 17.04-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://www.parabola.nu/packages/pcr/x86_64/shotcut/ * shotcut 17.04-1 [pcr] (i686): https://www.parabola.nu/packages/pcr/i686/shotcut/ The user provided the following additional text: New version: 17.06 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 8 00:08:01 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:08:01 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [python-gnusrss] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170608000801.1072.19393@proton.parabola.nu> megver83 at parabola.nu wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * python-gnusrss 0.2.2.2-1 [pcr] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/any/python-gnusrss/ The user provided the following additional text: New version 2.2.3 https://notabug.org/drymer/gnusrss/releases From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 8 21:20:26 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 21:20:26 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kdebase-runtime] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170608212026.1073.77591@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kdebase-runtime 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kdebase-runtime/ * kdebase-runtime 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kdebase-runtime/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 17.04.2 From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 8 21:34:20 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 21:34:20 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170608213420.1073.52085@proton.parabola.nu> jm.100best at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * linux-libre 4.11.3_gnu-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre/ * linux-libre 4.11.3_gnu-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre/ * linux-libre-docs 4.11.3_gnu-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-docs/ * linux-libre-docs 4.11.3_gnu-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-docs/ * linux-libre-headers 4.11.3_gnu-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-headers/ * linux-libre-headers 4.11.3_gnu-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-headers/ The user provided the following additional text: 4.11.4 From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Thu Jun 8 22:46:42 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:46:42 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [okular] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170510161107.1073.68608@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170510161107.1073.68608@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <7880190.StxIOczZHy@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * okular 16.12.1-2.parabola1 [libre] (armv7h): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/okular/ * okular > 16.12.3-2.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/okular/ * okular > 16.12.3-2.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/okular/ > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached an updated PKGBUILD for 17.04.2 -jc -------------- next part -------------- # Maintainer (Arch): Felix Yan # Maintainer (Arch): Antonio Rojas # Contributor (Arch): Andrea Scarpino # Maintainer: Andr? Silva pkgname=okular pkgver=17.04.2 pkgrel=1.parabola1 pkgdesc='Document Viewer, with copy-protection anti-feature turn off by default' arch=(i686 x86_64 armv7h) url="https://kde.org/applications/graphics/okular/" license=(GPL LGPL FDL) groups=(kde-applications kdegraphics) depends=(djvulibre libspectre libkexiv2 poppler-qt5 qca-qt5 kpty kactivities threadweaver kjs kparts mesa) makedepends=(extra-cmake-modules ebook-tools kdegraphics-mobipocket kdoctools khtml python chmlib) optdepends=('ebook-tools: mobi and epub support' 'kdegraphics-mobipocket: mobi support' 'khtml: CHM support' 'chmlib: CHM support' 'calligra: ODT and ODP support') conflicts=(kdegraphics-okular) replaces=(kdegraphics-okular) source=("https://download.kde.org/stable/applications/${pkgver}/src/okular-${pkgver}.tar.xz"{,.sig} 'turn_off_copy-protection_anti-feature.patch') sha512sums=('5524fb232ab74dda32f003d04b46b77d85c83704300a86eb83008ff00001011d54e98ef0ae7c91d6dbda13016635a3e1a1e37b19b5ab22925f065b31f61c3a92' 'SKIP' 'ff5068947d1d841319d1405c5b21b5ddd90571ffb38e14a18b371e2253afb2588a6700d8e212e3e2a4ec3ad1408bb5333929a98720eb597a4813b2329766a588') validpgpkeys=(CA262C6C83DE4D2FB28A332A3A6A4DB839EAA6D7) # Albert Astals Cid prepare() { mkdir -p build cd $pkgname-$pkgver patch -p1 -i ../turn_off_copy-protection_anti-feature.patch } build() { cd build cmake ../$pkgname-$pkgver \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib \ -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF make } package() { cd build make DESTDIR="$pkgdir" install } -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Fri Jun 9 22:18:37 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Dev] [Assist] linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Reg wrote: > I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that > the linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. > > I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. you are right. the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C From alejandrohp at openmailbox.org Fri Jun 9 22:40:49 2017 From: alejandrohp at openmailbox.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Alejandro_Hern=c3=a1ndez_Petermann?=) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:40:49 +0200 Subject: [Dev] [keepass] marked out-of-date Message-ID: alejandrohp at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * keepass 2.35-2 (any): https://www.parabola.nu/packages/community/any/keepass/ The user provided the following additional text: New version: 2.36 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0x11CF8933.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 3122 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sat Jun 10 01:15:11 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Dev] [Assist] linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Message-ID: <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: > Reg wrote: >> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that the >> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >> >> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. > > you are right. > > the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only > evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former > [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] > > also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? > base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the 'base' group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sat Jun 10 01:19:42 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Dev] [keepass] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1b13fa57-8a9e-8574-8455-2af0007bd59e@openmailbox.org> How could you mark a [community] package as outdated? BTW that pkg is on version 2.36 El 09/06/17 a las 18:40, Alejandro Hern?ndez Petermann escribi?: > > alejandrohp at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * keepass 2.35-2 (any): > https://www.parabola.nu/packages/community/any/keepass/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > New version: 2.36 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From reg_ at openmailbox.org Sat Jun 10 10:09:44 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:09:44 +0200 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: > base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the > 'base' > group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the > possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we should mention this in: * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) * Somewhere in the installation guide (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) There's also a group called openrc-base (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they be merged into one? On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: > El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >> Reg wrote: >>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that >>> the >>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>> >>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >> >> you are right. >> >> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >> >> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? >> > > base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the > 'base' > group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the > possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sat Jun 10 15:50:01 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: > On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the 'base' >> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. > > I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we > should mention this in: > * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) > * Somewhere in the installation guide > (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) Well thought! > There's also a group called openrc-base > (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). > Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they be > merged into one? openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base packages and OpenRC init scripts. > > On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>> Reg wrote: >>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that the >>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>> >>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>> >>> you are right. >>> >>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>> >>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? >>> >> >> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the 'base' >> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sat Jun 10 18:45:00 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Strange libremakepkg error Message-ID: <267816a8-9186-5f42-491c-14a884a826a0@openmailbox.org> Hi, I'm having a strange issue when running libremakepkg. $ sudo libremakepkg -n chroot1 ==> Initializing the chroot... | /usr/sbin/librechroot: line 69: Binary: command not found Why does it tries to run such command? Spanish output: $ sudo libremakepkg -n chroot1 ==> Initializing the chroot... | /usr/sbin/librechroot: l?nea 69: Coincidencia: no se encontr? la orden Thanks in advance. -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From joseph at xylon.me.uk Sat Jun 10 20:22:32 2017 From: joseph at xylon.me.uk (Joseph Graham) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 21:22:32 +0100 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman Message-ID: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> Hi, I'm adding translations to pacman2pacman. If you want to help please get pacman2pacman from git[0] and follow instructions in translations/CONTRIBUTE. We already have partial translations for Esperanto and Brazillian Portugese with just a few missing. [0] https://git.parabola.nu/pacman2pacman.git/ -- Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. My PGP key: 0x8cd7227da467d3ed404f6eefdb590f739e5ac458 I have a blog: http://www.naughtycomputer.uk/ I write software: https://www.suckmore.uk/ I run a web forum: https://www.freesoftwareuk.org.uk/ And a platform for Free Software success stories: http://www.freedcomputer.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sat Jun 10 20:38:37 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> References: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> Message-ID: <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> I'll help on the translation to spanish El 10/06/17 a las 16:22, Joseph Graham escribi?: > Hi, > > I'm adding translations to pacman2pacman. > > If you want to help please get pacman2pacman from git[0] and follow > instructions in translations/CONTRIBUTE. > > We already have partial translations for Esperanto and Brazillian > Portugese with just a few missing. > > [0] https://git.parabola.nu/pacman2pacman.git/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mr.j.spam.me at gmail.com Sat Jun 10 21:15:51 2017 From: mr.j.spam.me at gmail.com (Bill Auger) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 17:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this is reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 wrote: > > openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base > group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base > packages and OpenRC init scripts. that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something like: 'base-openrc-init-scripts' 'base-openrc-init' 'base-openrc-scripts' 'openrc-init-scripts' On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 wrote: > El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the 'base' >>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >> >> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we >> should mention this in: >> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >> * Somewhere in the installation guide >> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) > > Well thought! > >> There's also a group called openrc-base >> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they be >> merged into one? > > openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base > group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base > packages and OpenRC init scripts. > >> >> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>> Reg wrote: >>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that the >>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>> >>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>> >>>> you are right. >>>> >>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>> >>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? >>>> >>> >>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the 'base' >>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > > -- > GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > From nobody at parabola.nu Sat Jun 10 21:23:55 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 21:23:55 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [python-gnusrss] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170610212355.1073.40405@proton.parabola.nu> megver83 at parabola.nu wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * python-gnusrss 0.2.2.3-1 [pcr] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/any/python-gnusrss/ The user provided the following additional text: I marked this package as outdated, but even the version I suggested was outdated too. The notabug repo seems abandoned, actual version is 2.3.1 --> https://git.daemons.it/drymer/gnusrss/src/master/gnusrss.py#L540 in the daemons.it site From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Sun Jun 11 02:25:50 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:25:50 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [khotkeys] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170606181430.1073.54699@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170606181430.1073.54699@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <2043626.ITJubUET85@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * khotkeys 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/khotkeys/ * khotkeys > 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/khotkeys/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached an updated PKGBUILD for khotkeys 5.10.1 -jc -------------- next part -------------- # $Id: PKGBUILD 291158 2017-03-21 20:15:40Z arojas $ # Maintainer (Arch): Felix Yan # Contributor (Arch): Andrea Scarpino # Contributor (Arch): Antonio Rojas # Maintainer: Andr? Silva pkgname=khotkeys pkgver=5.10.1 pkgrel=1.parabola1 pkgdesc='KHotKeys, with DuckDuckGo HTML support' arch=('i686' 'x86_64' 'armv7h') url='https://www.kde.org/workspaces/plasmadesktop/' license=('LGPL') depends=('plasma-workspace') makedepends=('extra-cmake-modules' 'kdoctools' 'python' 'kdesignerplugin') conflicts=('kdebase-workspace') groups=(plasma) source=("https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/${pkgver}/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.xz"{,.sig}) sha512sums=('bd260215e3a9167d1871e7202268d5214f9f11ddd96bff1ecf37bb6970e6bac26c51c247be06182c3d3de624dc3668d071d0e75027847e9e74c4cd009e4a0ccb' 'SKIP') validpgpkeys=('2D1D5B0588357787DE9EE225EC94D18F7F05997E' # Jonathan Riddell '348C8651206633FD983A8FC4DEACEA00075E1D76' # KDE Neon 'D07BD8662C56CB291B316EB2F5675605C74E02CF') # David Edmundson prepare() { mkdir -p build cd ${pkgname}-${pkgver} sed -i 's|google[.]com|duckduckgo.com/html|' data/defaults.khotkeys } build() { cd build cmake ../${pkgname}-${pkgver} \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \ -DKDE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib \ -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF make } package() { cd build make DESTDIR="${pkgdir}" install } -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Sun Jun 11 02:26:10 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:26:10 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kinfocenter] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170606181504.1072.16833@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170606181504.1072.16833@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <2419788.D9OyNHHSvP@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kinfocenter 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kinfocenter/ * kinfocenter > 5.10.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kinfocenter/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached an updated PKGBUILD for kinfocenter 5.10.1 -jc -------------- next part -------------- # $Id: PKGBUILD 291158 2017-03-21 20:15:40Z arojas $ # Maintainer (Arch): Felix Yan # Contributor (Arch): Andrea Scarpino # Contributor (Arch): Antonio Rojas # Maintainer: Andr? Silva pkgname=kinfocenter pkgver=5.10.1 pkgrel=1.parabola1 pkgdesc='A utility that provides information about a computer system (Parabola rebranded)' arch=('i686' 'x86_64' 'armv7h') url='https://www.kde.org/applications/system/kinfocenter/' license=('LGPL') depends=('kcmutils' 'pciutils' 'glu' 'libraw1394' 'kwayland') makedepends=('extra-cmake-modules' 'python' 'plasma-framework' 'kdoctools') conflicts=('kdebase-workspace') groups=('plasma') source=("https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma/${pkgver}/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.xz"{,.sig} 'parabola-logo.svg::https://wiki.parabola.nu/images/a/af/Parabolagnu%2Blinuxlibre-dark-scalable.svg' 'kcm-about-distrorc') sha512sums=('be74aaaa7c881f4604b60dce126e8489ad3f782afddb412be7800d33e304a918822bab2ca17af9fc8e83ac97a2f2490734c8b1d6899a7b2f5901502110f5b99d' 'SKIP' 'af9f9a8074cb84e3a2ab35200189627d8fb529741aa9c2a316c6c6f049ffd88b6b16d98f1fcdef731a9f75a03883b6806fb48c87c533b94ab3e719bdc02f7b9f' '2a184861ce8aae52c98a143d3c905f74c03ccf10294234293f7eb647b663e9b0f95f2a45c3681e7948ddbdae082d51f9cd830e355302fdcd876a6d5be4ce557b') validpgpkeys=('2D1D5B0588357787DE9EE225EC94D18F7F05997E' # Jonathan Riddell '348C8651206633FD983A8FC4DEACEA00075E1D76' # KDE Neon 'D07BD8662C56CB291B316EB2F5675605C74E02CF') # David Edmundson prepare() { mkdir -p build } build() { cd build cmake ../${pkgname}-${pkgver} \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \ -DKDE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib \ -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF make } package() { cd build make DESTDIR="${pkgdir}" install # Install Parabola logo install -Dm644 "$srcdir"/parabola-logo.svg "$pkgdir"/usr/share/about-distro/parabola-logo.svg install -Dm644 "$srcdir"/kcm-about-distrorc "$pkgdir"/etc/xdg/kcm-about-distrorc } -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Sun Jun 11 04:56:47 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [okular] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <7880190.StxIOczZHy@iserlohn-fortress.net> References: <20170510161107.1073.68608@proton.parabola.nu> <7880190.StxIOczZHy@iserlohn-fortress.net> Message-ID: <1497157007.1274.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need gpg to verify this message jc_gargma wrote: > I've attached an updated PKGBUILD for 17.04.2 thank you, the new version is up. was it ok to attribute this to "jc "? if you are working with git on abslibre and don't want me to make the decision for you then consider sending a patch produced with `git format-patch` -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEONM+8pp2kRNDV2SHM0ZuEux7qUMFAlk8zRUACgkQM0ZuEux7 qUPKIRAAjh2cVQ2RJ1WmNS+/DLJfHQAvWXE69K94ZhnLTl7NLYkub8vFBWkk7Ssf v+BBhRaWqptKowLu2KrNK3ohbOksCWWr9DnwW+MwaqpgNzvaoJ85AbMhMaz2+35b Av1QEnlMps55Heflibbjqc7kti2t8iZeEzXjcwVvumfnMjundB4ZB5E57mdFLUoc CKkxFna3QNoj3yaSbC4KS2ZY8T2N2LxdPeKlV2vUApMDnyQ3GbwnRKs8dTQiQ045 zJhRFM6DCTB5Xwd99TNhtgWmt9k1uVSVBHWmEBiOx1cer9tohXiElCBT2TW+ZQjG jLRvdP7aLW/ittxTDfseaUnLNbCQ7VF7TKwX6RxojlAzx0DarA2LhNoL000/bINn 36BZXLXScPsQn+BR7rNqLVGJLFevkQT+EHBM4I9kGoAxWSXbchiSLRrnHuE2CORS qnfOS4dkHSOrxrGheeNKPFnW5V+IUR2tVvVHcTpm0jztmTbi3+MdHbiN6kkh+qvj 7oyCI7vz+8k/gSUdCa9/YRQ9p2qZ1IzBvZVWw6ppc22sMw5jTPaVI0Y2/W89ykR4 6IuS9vt0nC292C5l2lNMZl/4D/26vnuG7BeSgzl54SfUIuzXcVi8yQoZvH+z7SQx G2X6Eia0YHSScFqumvD6+CiZR049Sj4NWjEMuZBPx4YOM3xrXMY= =Oodo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Sun Jun 11 05:03:21 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 22:03:21 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [okular] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <1497157007.1274.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> References: <20170510161107.1073.68608@proton.parabola.nu> <7880190.StxIOczZHy@iserlohn-fortress.net> <1497157007.1274.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Message-ID: <1856346.HU2J0nozqD@iserlohn-fortress.net> > thank you, the new version is up. I'm glad it was acceptable. > was it ok to attribute this to "jc "? "jc_gargma " would be preferable. > if you are working with git on abslibre and don't want me to make the > decision for you then consider sending a patch produced with > `git format-patch` I'll submit all future updates as the format you suggest. -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Sun Jun 11 06:36:30 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:36:30 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kdebase-runtime] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170608212026.1073.77591@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170608212026.1073.77591@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <1744046.zN2nOihJgG@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kdebase-runtime 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kdebase-runtime/ * > kdebase-runtime 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kdebase-runtime/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kdebase-runtime to 17.04.2 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-kdebase-runtime-to-17.04.2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2477 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Sun Jun 11 06:50:00 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 06:50:00 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [ark] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170611065000.1073.53316@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * ark 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/ark/ * ark 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/ark/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 17.04.2 From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Sun Jun 11 06:51:10 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:51:10 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [ark] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170611065000.1073.53316@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170611065000.1073.53316@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <5110907.tJGWCSMzzY@iserlohn-fortress.net> On Saturday 10 June 2017 23:50:00 PDT Parabola Website Notification wrote: > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * ark 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/ark/ * ark > 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/ark/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update ark to 17.04.2 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-ark-to-17.04.2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1612 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Sun Jun 11 07:55:44 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:55:44 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kdelibs] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170611075544.1073.91855@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kdelibs 4.14.32-2.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kdelibs/ * kdelibs 4.14.32-2.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kdelibs/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 4.14.33 From reg_ at openmailbox.org Sun Jun 11 11:11:01 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 13:11:01 +0200 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: > i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that > the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the > 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this is > reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one > in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the installation guide should also be updated accordingly. > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 > wrote: >> >> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base >> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >> packages and OpenRC init scripts. When migrating from systemd to OpenRC on an existing installation, the base packages are most likely already installed. So it shouldn't hurt to have just one group. Right? On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: > that is unnecessarily confusing I agree. >> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we >>> should mention this in: >>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >> >> Well thought! I will do it, either later today or tomorrow. On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: > i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that > the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the > 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this is > reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one > in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case > > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 > wrote: >> >> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base >> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >> packages and OpenRC init scripts. > > that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something like: > 'base-openrc-init-scripts' > 'base-openrc-init' > 'base-openrc-scripts' > 'openrc-init-scripts' > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 > wrote: >> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>> 'base' >>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >>> >>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we >>> should mention this in: >>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >> >> Well thought! >> >>> There's also a group called openrc-base >>> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >>> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they be >>> merged into one? >> >> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base >> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >> >>> >>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>>> Reg wrote: >>>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that >>>>>> the >>>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>>> >>>>> you are right. >>>>> >>>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>>> >>>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? >>>>> >>>> >>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>> 'base' >>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dev mailing list >>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >> >> -- >> GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >> From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Sun Jun 11 11:17:31 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 04:17:31 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kdelibs] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170611075544.1073.91855@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170611075544.1073.91855@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <106942550.lRJou1sUhl@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kdelibs 4.14.32-2.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kdelibs/ * kdelibs > 4.14.32-2.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kdelibs/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kdelibs to 4.14.33 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-kdelibs-to-4.14.33.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2969 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sun Jun 11 17:09:10 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 13:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> El 11/06/17 a las 07:11, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: > On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this is >> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case > > This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the > installation guide should also be updated accordingly. > >> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >> wrote: >>> >>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base >>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. > > When migrating from systemd to OpenRC on an existing installation, the > base packages are most likely already installed. So it shouldn't hurt to > have just one group. Right? that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install base-openrc and there you are. > On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >> that is unnecessarily confusing > > I agree. > >>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we >>>> should mention this in: >>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>> >>> Well thought! > > I will do it, either later today or tomorrow. I can also help if you want. > On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this is >> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >> wrote: >>> >>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base >>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >> >> that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something like: >> 'base-openrc-init-scripts' >> 'base-openrc-init' >> 'base-openrc-scripts' >> 'openrc-init-scripts' >> >> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >> wrote: >>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>> 'base' >>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >>>> >>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think we >>>> should mention this in: >>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>> >>> Well thought! >>> >>>> There's also a group called openrc-base >>>> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >>>> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they be >>>> merged into one? >>> >>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the base >>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>> >>>> >>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>>>> Reg wrote: >>>>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed >>>>>>> that the >>>>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>>>> >>>>>> you are right. >>>>>> >>>>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>>>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>>>> >>>>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on purpose? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>> 'base' >>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh installations. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Sun Jun 11 18:15:20 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 13:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <1497204920.1894.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Reg wrote: > Bill Auger wrote: >> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >> is >> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the > > This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the > installation > guide should also be updated accordingly. > > > > i hesitate to change the meaning of the base group from what it means on Arch, which also provides more than one kernel. but if you go ahead with this, make sure to search the wiki for every instance of pacstrap usage. the implications extend beyond one installation guide. -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C From reg_ at openmailbox.org Mon Jun 12 21:14:34 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:14:34 +0200 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: > that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing > Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in > the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then > migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install > base-openrc and there you are. I get it now, thank you for your patience! As discussed previously I have now updated the wiki: * Installation guide: https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=Installation_Guide&type=revision&diff=19048&oldid=18816 * OpenRC page: https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=OpenRC&type=revision&diff=19049&oldid=19035 Feedback is welcome! On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: > El 11/06/17 a las 07:11, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >>> is >>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >> >> This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the >> installation guide should also be updated accordingly. >> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >> >> When migrating from systemd to OpenRC on an existing installation, the >> base packages are most likely already installed. So it shouldn't hurt >> to >> have just one group. Right? > > that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing > Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in > the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then > migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install > base-openrc and there you are. > >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> that is unnecessarily confusing >> >> I agree. >> >>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think >>>>> we >>>>> should mention this in: >>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>> >>>> Well thought! >> >> I will do it, either later today or tomorrow. > > I can also help if you want. > >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >>> is >>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>> >>> that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something like: >>> 'base-openrc-init-scripts' >>> 'base-openrc-init' >>> 'base-openrc-scripts' >>> 'openrc-init-scripts' >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>>> 'base' >>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>> installations. >>>>> >>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think >>>>> we >>>>> should mention this in: >>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>> >>>> Well thought! >>>> >>>>> There's also a group called openrc-base >>>>> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >>>>> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they >>>>> be >>>>> merged into one? >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>>>>> Reg wrote: >>>>>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed >>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you are right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>>>>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>>>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on >>>>>>> purpose? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>>> 'base' >>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>> installations. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dev mailing list >>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >> From reg_ at openmailbox.org Mon Jun 12 21:16:35 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:16:35 +0200 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: > that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing > Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in > the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then > migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install > base-openrc and there you are. I get it now, thank you for your patience! As discussed previously I have now updated the wiki: * Installation guide: https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=Installation_Guide&type=revision&diff=19048&oldid=18816 * OpenRC page: https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=OpenRC&type=revision&diff=19049&oldid=19035 Feedback is welcome! On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: > El 11/06/17 a las 07:11, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >>> is >>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >> >> This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the >> installation guide should also be updated accordingly. >> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >> >> When migrating from systemd to OpenRC on an existing installation, the >> base packages are most likely already installed. So it shouldn't hurt >> to >> have just one group. Right? > > that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing > Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in > the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then > migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install > base-openrc and there you are. > >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> that is unnecessarily confusing >> >> I agree. >> >>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think >>>>> we >>>>> should mention this in: >>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>> >>>> Well thought! >> >> I will do it, either later today or tomorrow. > > I can also help if you want. > >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >>> is >>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>> >>> that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something like: >>> 'base-openrc-init-scripts' >>> 'base-openrc-init' >>> 'base-openrc-scripts' >>> 'openrc-init-scripts' >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>>> 'base' >>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>> installations. >>>>> >>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think >>>>> we >>>>> should mention this in: >>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>> >>>> Well thought! >>>> >>>>> There's also a group called openrc-base >>>>> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >>>>> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they >>>>> be >>>>> merged into one? >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>>>>> Reg wrote: >>>>>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed >>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you are right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>>>>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>>>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on >>>>>>> purpose? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>>> 'base' >>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>> installations. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dev mailing list >>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >> From reg_ at openmailbox.org Mon Jun 12 21:20:10 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:20:10 +0200 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <19e97f159d4720cc45b1a261a9504eea@openmailbox.org> On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: > that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing > Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in > the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then > migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install > base-openrc and there you are. I get it now, thank you for your patience! As discussed previously I have now updated the wiki: * Installation guide: https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=Installation_Guide&type=revision&diff=19048&oldid=18816 * OpenRC page: https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=OpenRC&type=revision&diff=19049&oldid=19035 Feedback is welcome! On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: > El 11/06/17 a las 07:11, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >>> is >>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >> >> This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the >> installation guide should also be updated accordingly. >> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >> >> When migrating from systemd to OpenRC on an existing installation, the >> base packages are most likely already installed. So it shouldn't hurt >> to >> have just one group. Right? > > that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing > Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, in > the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then > migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just install > base-openrc and there you are. > >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> that is unnecessarily confusing >> >> I agree. >> >>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think >>>>> we >>>>> should mention this in: >>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>> >>>> Well thought! >> >> I will do it, either later today or tomorrow. > > I can also help if you want. > >> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer that >>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this >>> is >>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the one >>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>> >>> that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something like: >>> 'base-openrc-init-scripts' >>> 'base-openrc-init' >>> 'base-openrc-scripts' >>> 'openrc-init-scripts' >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 >>> wrote: >>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>>> 'base' >>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>> installations. >>>>> >>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I think >>>>> we >>>>> should mention this in: >>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>> >>>> Well thought! >>>> >>>>> There's also a group called openrc-base >>>>> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >>>>> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they >>>>> be >>>>> merged into one? >>>> >>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>> base >>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the base >>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>>>>> Reg wrote: >>>>>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed >>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you are right. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now only >>>>>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>>>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on >>>>>>> purpose? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as the >>>>>> 'base' >>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>> installations. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Dev mailing list >>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >> From reg_ at openmailbox.org Mon Jun 12 21:33:28 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (Reg) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:33:28 +0200 Subject: [Dev] OpenRC groups - Was: linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore In-Reply-To: <19e97f159d4720cc45b1a261a9504eea@openmailbox.org> References: <1497046717.19739.1@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <940f1644-2ca0-c727-d510-6745be0a624a@openmailbox.org> <48bff695e3a9f0582cab66effeabea12@openmailbox.org> <4bf16467938a912ef697d9d553a5645b@openmailbox.org> <29d0bdfb-9d4a-2e96-dd17-93f13df4b559@openmailbox.org> <19e97f159d4720cc45b1a261a9504eea@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <16703CB4-AA9F-41EF-B367-86104A0D1472@openmailbox.org> I apologize if you guys received my previous email multiple times. On June 12, 2017 11:20:10 PM GMT+02:00, reg_ at openmailbox.org wrote: >On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: >> that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing >> Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, >in >> the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then >> migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just >install >> base-openrc and there you are. > >I get it now, thank you for your patience! > >As discussed previously I have now updated the wiki: >* Installation guide: >https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=Installation_Guide&type=revision&diff=19048&oldid=18816 >* OpenRC page: >https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=OpenRC&type=revision&diff=19049&oldid=19035 >Feedback is welcome! > >On 2017-06-11 19:09, Megver83 wrote: >> El 11/06/17 a las 07:11, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer >that >>>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this > >>>> is >>>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the >one >>>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >>> >>> This makes sense. If this is the approach we want to keep, the >>> installation guide should also be updated accordingly. >>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 > >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>>> base >>>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the >base >>>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>> >>> When migrating from systemd to OpenRC on an existing installation, >the >>> base packages are most likely already installed. So it shouldn't >hurt >>> to >>> have just one group. Right? >> >> that's right, but I meant a fresh install. If you are installing >> Parabola from a Live CD and you want the fresh install with OpenRC, >in >> the past you *had* to install the base group (with Systemd) and then >> migrate to OpenRC. Now you don't have to do that way, you just >install >> base-openrc and there you are. >> >>> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>>> that is unnecessarily confusing >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I >think >>>>>> we >>>>>> should mention this in: >>>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>>> >>>>> Well thought! >>> >>> I will do it, either later today or tomorrow. >> >> I can also help if you want. >> >>> On 2017-06-10 23:15, Bill Auger wrote: >>>> i also noticed this week when working on the calamares installer >that >>>> the kernel is not in the 'base' group - i had to require the >>>> 'linux-libre' package separately to complete a fresh install - this > >>>> is >>>> reasonable though as there several kernels to choose from so the >one >>>> in the base group would be superfluous for every other use case >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 > >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>>> base >>>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the >base >>>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>>> >>>> that is unnecessarily confusing it could be renamed - something >like: >>>> 'base-openrc-init-scripts' >>>> 'base-openrc-init' >>>> 'base-openrc-scripts' >>>> 'openrc-init-scripts' >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Megver83 > >>>> wrote: >>>>> El 10/06/17 a las 06:09, reg_ at openmailbox.org escribi?: >>>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as >the >>>>>>> 'base' >>>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>>> installations. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was not aware that there was such a group, this is nice! I >think >>>>>> we >>>>>> should mention this in: >>>>>> * OpenRC's wiki page (https://wiki.parabola.nu/OpenRC) >>>>>> * Somewhere in the installation guide >>>>>> (https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_Guide) >>>>> >>>>> Well thought! >>>>> >>>>>> There's also a group called openrc-base >>>>>> (https://www.parabola.nu/groups/x86_64/openrc-base/). >>>>>> Is there really a need for having two separate groups? Can't they > >>>>>> be >>>>>> merged into one? >>>>> >>>>> openrc-base only offers you the init scripts for services in the >>>>> base >>>>> group, but not base packages, while base-openrc offers all the >base >>>>> packages and OpenRC init scripts. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2017-06-10 03:15, Megver83 wrote: >>>>>>> El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribi?: >>>>>>>> Reg wrote: >>>>>>>>> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed >>>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>>> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you are right. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the problem seems to be that the groups=() definition is now >only >>>>>>>> evaluated if [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux" ], instead of the former >>>>>>>> [ "${pkgbase}" = "linux-libre" ] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> also, base-openrc was taken out of the groups. was that on >>>>>>>> purpose? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> base-openrc purpose is to offer the same base installation as >the >>>>>>> 'base' >>>>>>> group but with OpenRC instead of Systemd, so that users have the >>>>>>> possibility to install Parabola with OpenRC in fresh >>>>>>> installations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>>>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>>>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>> > >_______________________________________________ >Dev mailing list >Dev at lists.parabola.nu >https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 13 14:20:35 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:20:35 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [i2p] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170613142035.1072.24641@proton.parabola.nu> jackson at riseup.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * i2p 0.9.29-1 [pcr] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/any/i2p/ The user provided the following additional text: 0.9.30 is out From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 13 19:52:13 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:52:13 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [openswan] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170613195213.1073.66300@proton.parabola.nu> uaqben at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * openswan 2.6.42-3 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/openswan/ * openswan 2.6.42-3 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/openswan/ The user provided the following additional text: v2.6.49.1 is available https://github.com/xelerance/Openswan/releases From reg_ at openmailbox.org Tue Jun 13 20:14:52 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:14:52 +0200 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> References: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <2029391dcd0d7fae034c45efeadffc03@openmailbox.org> Please find a git patch for the French translation in attachment. On 2017-06-10 22:38, Megver83 wrote: > I'll help on the translation to spanish > > El 10/06/17 a las 16:22, Joseph Graham escribi?: >> Hi, >> >> I'm adding translations to pacman2pacman. >> >> If you want to help please get pacman2pacman from git[0] and follow >> instructions in translations/CONTRIBUTE. >> >> We already have partial translations for Esperanto and Brazillian >> Portugese with just a few missing. >> >> [0] https://git.parabola.nu/pacman2pacman.git/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: french_translation.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1900 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 13 23:22:11 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 23:22:11 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kinfocenter] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170613232211.1073.38923@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kinfocenter 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kinfocenter/ * kinfocenter 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kinfocenter/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.10.2 From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 13 23:22:14 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 23:22:14 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [khotkeys] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170613232214.1073.8475@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * khotkeys 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/khotkeys/ * khotkeys 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/khotkeys/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.10.2 From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Tue Jun 13 23:25:20 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:25:20 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kinfocenter] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170613232211.1073.38923@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170613232211.1073.38923@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <1746645.1ngIdEgN4c@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kinfocenter 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kinfocenter/ * kinfocenter > 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kinfocenter/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kinfocenter to 5.10.2 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-kinfocenter-to-5.10.2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1619 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Tue Jun 13 23:25:56 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:25:56 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [khotkeys] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170613232214.1073.8475@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170613232214.1073.8475@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <2270210.EHTiXGm936@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * khotkeys 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/khotkeys/ * khotkeys > 5.10.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/khotkeys/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update khotkeys to 5.10.2 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-khotkeys-to-5.10.2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1383 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Tue Jun 13 23:56:02 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 23:56:02 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio-extras] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170613235602.1073.87415@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kio-extras 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio-extras/ * kio-extras 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kio-extras/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 17.04.2 From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Tue Jun 13 23:59:38 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:59:38 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio-extras] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170613235602.1073.87415@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170613235602.1073.87415@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <1716660.UDx5iunHDo@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kio-extras 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio-extras/ * kio-extras > 17.04.1-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kio-extras/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kio-extras to 17.04.2 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-kio-extras-to-17.04.2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1534 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Wed Jun 14 00:01:03 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:01:03 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170614000103.1073.44231@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kio 5.34.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio/ * kio 5.34.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kio/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.35.0 From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Wed Jun 14 00:02:28 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:02:28 -0700 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20170614000103.1073.44231@proton.parabola.nu> References: <20170614000103.1073.44231@proton.parabola.nu> Message-ID: <2647008.XLoXuN422g@iserlohn-fortress.net> > jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kio 5.34.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio/ * kio > 5.34.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kio/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kio to 5.35.0 -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Updated-kio-to-5.35.0.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1878 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From joseph at xylon.me.uk Wed Jun 14 07:13:07 2017 From: joseph at xylon.me.uk (Joseph Graham) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:13:07 +0100 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <2029391dcd0d7fae034c45efeadffc03@openmailbox.org> References: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> <2029391dcd0d7fae034c45efeadffc03@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <20170614071307.GB3329@avalon-parabola.home> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:14:52PM +0200, reg_ at openmailbox.org wrote: > Please find a git patch for the French translation in attachment. > Laust beat you to it: https://git.parabola.nu/pacman2pacman.git/commit/?id=07afb581383aa7d177b652109d915b94ffc057d2 BTW you formatted it wrong, the translation goes in msgstr "". Thankyou for your efforts. > > --- > translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po > > diff --git a/translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po b/translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..67a87f0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ > +#: pacman2pacman-get:38 > +msgid "Le premier argument doit ??tre l'URL de t??l??chargement." > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:39 > +msgid "Le deuxi??me argument doit ??tre le nom de fichier local, plus l'extension ???.part???." > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:48 > +msgid "Erreur: Le d??mon transmission n'est pas en cours d'ex??cution." > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:124 > +msgid "Pas de fichier torrent trouv?? pour ce paquet :S" > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:167 > +msgid "Transmission n'a pas accept?? notre fichier torrent - essai par HTTP" > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:203 > +msgid "T??l??chargement pacman2pacman p2p : ${pname}: ${progress}" > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:227 > +msgid "0.0% Attention : semence morte..." > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:258 > +msgid "Semence morte et pas de pair, torrent retir?? de transmission et essai par HTTP." > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:274 > +msgid "\\rT??l??chargement pacman2pacman p2p : %s: %s " > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:290 > +msgid "erreur en d??pla??ant \\\"${pkg_cache_location}/${url##*/}\\\". torrent retir?? de transmission et essai par HTTP." > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:320 > +msgid "T??l??chargment pacman2pacman http : ${pname}: ${progress}" > +msgstr "" > +#: pacman2pacman-get:351 > +msgid "\\rT??l??chargement pacman2pacman http : %s: %s " > +msgstr "" > -- > 2.13.1 > -- Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. My PGP key: 0x8cd7227da467d3ed404f6eefdb590f739e5ac458 I have a blog: http://www.naughtycomputer.uk/ I write software: https://www.suckmore.uk/ I run a web forum: https://www.freesoftwareuk.org.uk/ And a platform for Free Software success stories: http://www.freedcomputer.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Wed Jun 14 07:33:58 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:33:58 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170614073358.1073.12177@proton.parabola.nu> patrick at bacha.dk wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * iceweasel 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/iceweasel/ * iceweasel 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/iceweasel/ The user provided the following additional text: 54.0 is out with Electrolysis! https://venturebeat.com/2017/06/13/firefox-54-arrives-with-multi-processor-support-for-all-users/ From nobody at parabola.nu Wed Jun 14 07:37:24 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:37:24 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [icecat] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170614073724.1072.16817@proton.parabola.nu> patrick at bacha.dk wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * icecat 52.1.0_gnu1-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/icecat/ * icecat 52.1.0_gnu1-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/icecat/ * icecat-debug 52.1.0_gnu1-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/icecat-debug/ * icecat-debug 52.1.0_gnu1-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/icecat-debug/ The user provided the following additional text: 52.2.0 is out. From reg_ at openmailbox.org Wed Jun 14 09:00:07 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (Reg) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:00:07 +0200 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <20170614071307.GB3329@avalon-parabola.home> References: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> <2029391dcd0d7fae034c45efeadffc03@openmailbox.org> <20170614071307.GB3329@avalon-parabola.home> Message-ID: <0C7023E6-7AFA-4D96-9278-7F3ECB012F9F@openmailbox.org> Of course, silly me :) Is anyone working on Swedish yet? If not I can provide it tomorrow. On June 14, 2017 9:13:07 AM GMT+02:00, Joseph Graham wrote: >On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:14:52PM +0200, reg_ at openmailbox.org wrote: >> Please find a git patch for the French translation in attachment. >> >Laust beat you to it: >https://git.parabola.nu/pacman2pacman.git/commit/?id=07afb581383aa7d177b652109d915b94ffc057d2 > >BTW you formatted it wrong, the translation goes in msgstr "". > >Thankyou for your efforts. > >> >> --- >> translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po | 36 >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po >> >> diff --git a/translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po >b/translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..67a87f0 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/translations/fr/pacman2pacman-get.po >> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:38 >> +msgid "Le premier argument doit ??tre l'URL de t??l??chargement." >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:39 >> +msgid "Le deuxi??me argument doit ??tre le nom de fichier local, >plus l'extension ???.part???." >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:48 >> +msgid "Erreur: Le d??mon transmission n'est pas en cours >d'ex??cution." >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:124 >> +msgid "Pas de fichier torrent trouv?? pour ce paquet :S" >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:167 >> +msgid "Transmission n'a pas accept?? notre fichier torrent - essai >par HTTP" >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:203 >> +msgid "T??l??chargement pacman2pacman p2p : ${pname}: ${progress}" >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:227 >> +msgid "0.0% Attention : semence morte..." >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:258 >> +msgid "Semence morte et pas de pair, torrent retir?? de transmission >et essai par HTTP." >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:274 >> +msgid "\\rT??l??chargement pacman2pacman p2p : %s: %s " >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:290 >> +msgid "erreur en d??pla??ant >\\\"${pkg_cache_location}/${url##*/}\\\". torrent retir?? de >transmission et essai par HTTP." >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:320 >> +msgid "T??l??chargment pacman2pacman http : ${pname}: ${progress}" >> +msgstr "" >> +#: pacman2pacman-get:351 >> +msgid "\\rT??l??chargement pacman2pacman http : %s: %s " >> +msgstr "" >> -- >> 2.13.1 >> > >-- >Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. > >My PGP key: 0x8cd7227da467d3ed404f6eefdb590f739e5ac458 > >I have a blog: http://www.naughtycomputer.uk/ >I write software: https://www.suckmore.uk/ >I run a web forum: https://www.freesoftwareuk.org.uk/ >And a platform for Free Software success stories: >http://www.freedcomputer.net/ -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joseph at xylon.me.uk Wed Jun 14 10:24:05 2017 From: joseph at xylon.me.uk (Joseph Graham) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:24:05 +0100 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <0C7023E6-7AFA-4D96-9278-7F3ECB012F9F@openmailbox.org> References: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> <2029391dcd0d7fae034c45efeadffc03@openmailbox.org> <20170614071307.GB3329@avalon-parabola.home> <0C7023E6-7AFA-4D96-9278-7F3ECB012F9F@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <20170614102405.GC3329@avalon-parabola.home> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:00:07AM +0200, Reg wrote: > > Is anyone working on Swedish yet? If not I can provide it tomorrow. > Nope no-one is working on Swedish yet AFAIK. -- Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. My PGP key: 0x8cd7227da467d3ed404f6eefdb590f739e5ac458 I have a blog: http://www.naughtycomputer.uk/ I write software: https://www.suckmore.uk/ I run a web forum: https://www.freesoftwareuk.org.uk/ And a platform for Free Software success stories: http://www.freedcomputer.net/ From nobody at parabola.nu Wed Jun 14 19:26:19 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:26:19 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel-l10n-es-ar] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170614192619.1073.1508@proton.parabola.nu> eliotime3000 at openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * iceweasel-l10n-ach 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ach/ * iceweasel-l10n-af 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-af/ * iceweasel-l10n-an 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-an/ * iceweasel-l10n-ar 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ar/ * iceweasel-l10n-as 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-as/ * iceweasel-l10n-ast 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ast/ * iceweasel-l10n-az 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-az/ * iceweasel-l10n-bg 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-bg/ * iceweasel-l10n-bn-bd 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-bn-bd/ * iceweasel-l10n-bn-in 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-bn-in/ * iceweasel-l10n-br 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-br/ * iceweasel-l10n-bs 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-bs/ * iceweasel-l10n-ca 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ca/ * iceweasel-l10n-cak 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-cak/ * iceweasel-l10n-cs 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-cs/ * iceweasel-l10n-cy 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-cy/ * iceweasel-l10n-da 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-da/ * iceweasel-l10n-de 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-de/ * iceweasel-l10n-dsb 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-dsb/ * iceweasel-l10n-el 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-el/ * iceweasel-l10n-en-gb 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-en-gb/ * iceweasel-l10n-en-us 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-en-us/ * iceweasel-l10n-en-za 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-en-za/ * iceweasel-l10n-eo 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-eo/ * iceweasel-l10n-es-ar 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-es-ar/ * iceweasel-l10n-es-cl 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-es-cl/ * iceweasel-l10n-es-es 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-es-es/ * iceweasel-l10n-es-mx 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-es-mx/ * iceweasel-l10n-et 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-et/ * iceweasel-l10n-eu 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-eu/ * iceweasel-l10n-fa 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-fa/ * iceweasel-l10n-ff 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ff/ * iceweasel-l10n-fi 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-fi/ * iceweasel-l10n-fr 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-fr/ * iceweasel-l10n-fy-nl 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-fy-nl/ * iceweasel-l10n-ga-ie 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ga-ie/ * iceweasel-l10n-gd 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-gd/ * iceweasel-l10n-gl 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-gl/ * iceweasel-l10n-gn 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-gn/ * iceweasel-l10n-gu-in 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-gu-in/ * iceweasel-l10n-he 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-he/ * iceweasel-l10n-hi-in 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-hi-in/ * iceweasel-l10n-hr 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-hr/ * iceweasel-l10n-hsb 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-hsb/ * iceweasel-l10n-hu 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-hu/ * iceweasel-l10n-hy-am 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-hy-am/ * iceweasel-l10n-id 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-id/ * iceweasel-l10n-is 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-is/ * iceweasel-l10n-it 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-it/ * iceweasel-l10n-ja 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ja/ * iceweasel-l10n-ka 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ka/ * iceweasel-l10n-kab 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-kab/ * iceweasel-l10n-kk 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-kk/ * iceweasel-l10n-km 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-km/ * iceweasel-l10n-kn 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-kn/ * iceweasel-l10n-ko 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ko/ * iceweasel-l10n-lij 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-lij/ * iceweasel-l10n-lt 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-lt/ * iceweasel-l10n-lv 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-lv/ * iceweasel-l10n-mai 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-mai/ * iceweasel-l10n-mk 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-mk/ * iceweasel-l10n-ml 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ml/ * iceweasel-l10n-mr 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-mr/ * iceweasel-l10n-ms 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ms/ * iceweasel-l10n-nb-no 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-nb-no/ * iceweasel-l10n-nl 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-nl/ * iceweasel-l10n-nn-no 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-nn-no/ * iceweasel-l10n-or 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-or/ * iceweasel-l10n-pa-in 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-pa-in/ * iceweasel-l10n-pl 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-pl/ * iceweasel-l10n-pt-br 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-pt-br/ * iceweasel-l10n-pt-pt 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-pt-pt/ * iceweasel-l10n-rm 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-rm/ * iceweasel-l10n-ro 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ro/ * iceweasel-l10n-ru 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ru/ * iceweasel-l10n-si 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-si/ * iceweasel-l10n-sk 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-sk/ * iceweasel-l10n-sl 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-sl/ * iceweasel-l10n-son 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-son/ * iceweasel-l10n-sq 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-sq/ * iceweasel-l10n-sr 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-sr/ * iceweasel-l10n-sv-se 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-sv-se/ * iceweasel-l10n-ta 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-ta/ * iceweasel-l10n-te 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-te/ * iceweasel-l10n-th 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-th/ * iceweasel-l10n-tr 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-tr/ * iceweasel-l10n-uk 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-uk/ * iceweasel-l10n-uz 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-uz/ * iceweasel-l10n-vi 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-vi/ * iceweasel-l10n-xh 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-xh/ * iceweasel-l10n-zh-cn 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-zh-cn/ * iceweasel-l10n-zh-tw 1:53.0.3-1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/iceweasel-l10n-zh-tw/ The user provided the following additional text: Please update the Iceweasel release edition to the version 54, according to the Firefox version. From nospam at curso.re Wed Jun 14 22:00:38 2017 From: nospam at curso.re (nospam at curso.re) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 23:00:38 +0100 Subject: [Dev] Potential privacy violation in connman connection manager Message-ID: <87bmpqxm9l.fsf@example.com> Hi all, the connman[0] connection manager tries to detect whether an internet connection is available by installing a temporary route to ipv4.connman.net and ipv6.connman.net This is documented in the README[1] and mentioned in the Arch wiki[2]. Although the official documentation claims that the remote servers do not log any connection information, nothing grants that this may change in the future. It is possible, however, to disable the online checks with a configuration setting in /etc/connman/main.conf as shown below. $ cat /etc/connman/main.conf [General] EnableOnlineCheck=false Should Paraboola ship a connman package with that setting since the default is to enable online checks? Best, -- S. [0] https://01.org/connman [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/connman/connman.git/tree/README#n358 [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/connman#Unknown_route_on_connection From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 15 12:02:28 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:02:28 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [ocaml-ssl] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170615120228.1073.60805@proton.parabola.nu> jazzyeagle79 at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * ocaml-ssl 0.5.1-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/ocaml-ssl/ * ocaml-ssl 0.5.1-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/ocaml-ssl/ The user provided the following additional text: 0.5.3 was released on 11/8/2016 From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 15 12:29:15 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:29:15 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [ocaml-pcre] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170615122915.1072.18584@proton.parabola.nu> jazzyeagle79 at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * ocaml-pcre 7.0.2-2 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/ocaml-pcre/ * ocaml-pcre 7.0.2-2 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/ocaml-pcre/ The user provided the following additional text: Version 7.2.3 was released on 25 Feb 2016. Please update. From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 15 13:53:18 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:53:18 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [ocaml-lwt] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170615135318.1071.28465@proton.parabola.nu> jazzyeagle79 at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * ocaml-lwt 2.5.1-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/ocaml-lwt/ * ocaml-lwt 2.5.1-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/ocaml-lwt/ The user provided the following additional text: Current version is 2.7.0 as of 03 Jan 2017 From nobody at parabola.nu Thu Jun 15 15:21:07 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:21:07 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [kdenetwork-kopete] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170615152107.1072.2133@proton.parabola.nu> megver83 at parabola.nu wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: Version 17.04.2 is available From reg_ at openmailbox.org Thu Jun 15 19:48:14 2017 From: reg_ at openmailbox.org (reg_ at openmailbox.org) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:48:14 +0200 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <20170614102405.GC3329@avalon-parabola.home> References: <20170610202232.GB649@avalon-parabola.home> <0448f1ec-7412-aff6-748a-ee630b315213@openmailbox.org> <2029391dcd0d7fae034c45efeadffc03@openmailbox.org> <20170614071307.GB3329@avalon-parabola.home> <0C7023E6-7AFA-4D96-9278-7F3ECB012F9F@openmailbox.org> <20170614102405.GC3329@avalon-parabola.home> Message-ID: Here's the patch with the Swedish translation. On 2017-06-14 12:24, Joseph Graham wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:00:07AM +0200, Reg wrote: >> >> Is anyone working on Swedish yet? If not I can provide it tomorrow. >> > Nope no-one is working on Swedish yet AFAIK. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: swedish_translation.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 2525 bytes Desc: not available URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Fri Jun 16 13:48:14 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Pacman2pacman spanish translation Message-ID: <9c8d1892-6892-ad88-cd54-5022881cb670@openmailbox.org> Hi, just added the spanish translation for pacman2pacman --> https://git.parabola.nu/pacman2pacman.git/commit/?id=05d9e1982f6dd53fe35ce8c6479a8944e2c7b503 If anyone else needs help for translating software, feel free to ask me. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Fri Jun 16 14:53:23 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Icedove GUI is buggy Message-ID: Hi, I made a bug report about this https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1369 There are screenshots too, I'd like to know if this is also happening to someone else. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From alessi at robertalessi.net Fri Jun 16 14:59:42 2017 From: alessi at robertalessi.net (Robert Alessi) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:59:42 +0200 Subject: [Dev] Icedove GUI is buggy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170616145942.GC2628@riseup.net> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Megver83 wrote: > Hi, I made a bug report about this https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1369 > There are screenshots too, I'd like to know if this is also happening to > someone else. Thanks. > Yes it is! I experience exactly the same. Robert -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andreas at grapentin.org Fri Jun 16 15:54:05 2017 From: andreas at grapentin.org (Andreas Grapentin) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:54:05 +0200 Subject: [Dev] Icedove GUI is buggy In-Reply-To: <20170616145942.GC2628@riseup.net> References: <20170616145942.GC2628@riseup.net> Message-ID: <20170616155405.GA20645@parabola-pocket.localdomain> shit, I made a stupid mistake here. give me an hour and I'll fix it! sorry. -A On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Robert Alessi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Megver83 wrote: > > Hi, I made a bug report about this https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1369 > > There are screenshots too, I'd like to know if this is also happening to > > someone else. Thanks. > > > > Yes it is! I experience exactly the same. > > Robert > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Sat Jun 17 04:11:34 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 23:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <2647008.XLoXuN422g@iserlohn-fortress.net> References: <20170614000103.1073.44231@proton.parabola.nu> <2647008.XLoXuN422g@iserlohn-fortress.net> Message-ID: <1497672694.1275.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> jc_gargma: > I've attached a git format-patch to update kio to 5.35.0 > all good with your contributions thus far, thank you for them. are you familiar with building packages with libretools? maybe we should let you upgrade them yourself. -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C From lukeshu at lukeshu.com Sat Jun 17 06:08:08 2017 From: lukeshu at lukeshu.com (Luke Shumaker) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Potential privacy violation in connman connection manager In-Reply-To: <87bmpqxm9l.fsf@example.com> References: <87bmpqxm9l.fsf@example.com> Message-ID: <87y3srqh87.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:00:38 -0400, nospam at curso.re wrote: > the connman[0] connection manager tries to detect whether an internet > connection is available by installing a temporary route to > ipv4.connman.net and ipv6.connman.net > > This is documented in the README[1] and mentioned in the Arch wiki[2]. > > Although the official documentation claims that the remote servers do > not log any connection information, nothing grants that this may change > in the future. > > It is possible, however, to disable the online checks with a > configuration setting in /etc/connman/main.conf as shown below. > > $ cat /etc/connman/main.conf > [General] > EnableOnlineCheck=false > > Should Paraboola ship a connman package with that setting since the > default is to enable online checks? It's a useful feature, and it does require a server-side. That's unavoidable if you want to implement the feature. It isn't going through your browser or leaking any data other than your IP. The only information being leaked is "someone is using connman 1.23 at IP $XXXX". That's not a notable privacy violation in my book. I wouldn't be opposed to patching it to go to ipv{4,6}.parabola.nu or something so that Parabola could ensure that the data isn't being logged (the user would still need to trust us, but they're largely doing that anyway by trusting our binaries). But none of our servers are IPv6 right now. And I'm not really sure it's worth the effort, given the tiny amount of information in the leak. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From nospam at curso.re Sat Jun 17 07:01:37 2017 From: nospam at curso.re (Stefano M.) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 08:01:37 +0100 Subject: [Dev] Potential privacy violation in connman connection manager In-Reply-To: <87y3srqh87.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> (Luke Shumaker's message of "Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:08:08 -0400") References: <87bmpqxm9l.fsf@example.com> <87y3srqh87.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Message-ID: <87poe3yu5q.fsf@example.com> Luke Shumaker writes: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:00:38 -0400, > nospam at curso.re wrote: >> the connman[0] connection manager tries to detect whether an internet >> connection is available by installing a temporary route to >> ipv4.connman.net and ipv6.connman.net >> >> This is documented in the README[1] and mentioned in the Arch wiki[2]. >> >> Although the official documentation claims that the remote servers do >> not log any connection information, nothing grants that this may change >> in the future. >> >> It is possible, however, to disable the online checks with a >> configuration setting in /etc/connman/main.conf as shown below. >> >> $ cat /etc/connman/main.conf >> [General] >> EnableOnlineCheck=false >> >> Should Paraboola ship a connman package with that setting since the >> default is to enable online checks? > > It's a useful feature, and it does require a server-side. That's > unavoidable if you want to implement the feature. It isn't going > through your browser or leaking any data other than your IP. The only > information being leaked is "someone is using connman 1.23 at IP > $XXXX". That's not a notable privacy violation in my book. > > I wouldn't be opposed to patching it to go to ipv{4,6}.parabola.nu or > something so that Parabola could ensure that the data isn't being > logged (the user would still need to trust us, but they're largely > doing that anyway by trusting our binaries). But none of our servers > are IPv6 right now. And I'm not really sure it's worth the effort, > given the tiny amount of information in the leak. Hello, Thanks for taking time to write a reply to my email. Honesly, I have no strong feelings about this and just wanted to make you guys aware of this feature in case you weren't. I have personally disabled the check and haven't had any issue with that. That's why I thought that simply shipping the option to disable the check by default and leaving it to the user to opt in would be sensible. Regarding the information that connman sends to the servers, that should be easily verifiable from the source code. However the server-side behavior may change in the future with little or no notice. Anyway, the whois record of connman.net has an email contact so we could always reach out for questions. Best, -- S. From alessi at robertalessi.net Sat Jun 17 14:18:34 2017 From: alessi at robertalessi.net (Robert Alessi) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 16:18:34 +0200 Subject: [Dev] outdated 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon In-Reply-To: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> References: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> Message-ID: <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> Hi, Is there any progress on this? For the time being, staying out of prism also means staying out of gnome... :( Robert On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 06:16:37PM +0200, Robert Alessi wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Since the update of gnome to v3.24.2, I can't any longer log into > gnome, nor can I use gdm. > > Since I use the 'nonprism' repository, I guess the culprit may be > the 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon version which is still at > v3.22.1. > > Can anybody look into this issue? > > Many thanks in anticipation! > > Robert -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lukeshu at lukeshu.com Sun Jun 18 03:48:15 2017 From: lukeshu at lukeshu.com (Luke Shumaker) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 23:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Dev] notsystemd v232.1 release announcement Message-ID: <87vanuq7ls.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> I am pleased to announce the initial release of "notsystemd". It's a bit late (I had promised it by the end of May), but it's here! notsystemd is a project to turn the various components of systemd into independent pieces that can be used no matter which software is used for PID 1; in a similar spirit to eudev or elogind. This release focuses on the systemd-nspawn utility. At a minimum, the following utilities from notsystemd should be functional on non-systemd systems: systemd-nspawn systemd-machine-id-setup systemd-tmpfiles systemd-sysusers The sources are at https://repo.parabola.nu/other/notsystemd/ Pre-built packages have been released to the [libre] repository for Parabola GNU/Linux-libre. Of particular interest to Parabola developers, installing 'notsystemd' on an openrc system will allow librechroot and libremakepkg to be used. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sun Jun 18 17:01:45 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 13:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Dev] notsystemd v232.1 release announcement In-Reply-To: <87vanuq7ls.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> References: <87vanuq7ls.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Message-ID: this is simply great, I could even create an ARM chroot in my OpenRC OS, thank you a lot lukeshu!! It's time to update the documentation in the wiki, I'll do that. El 17/06/17 a las 23:48, Luke Shumaker escribi?: > I am pleased to announce the initial release of "notsystemd". It's a > bit late (I had promised it by the end of May), but it's here! > > notsystemd is a project to turn the various components of systemd into > independent pieces that can be used no matter which software is used > for PID 1; in a similar spirit to eudev or elogind. This release > focuses on the systemd-nspawn utility. > > At a minimum, the following utilities from notsystemd should be > functional on non-systemd systems: > > systemd-nspawn > systemd-machine-id-setup > systemd-tmpfiles > systemd-sysusers > > The sources are at https://repo.parabola.nu/other/notsystemd/ > > Pre-built packages have been released to the [libre] repository for > Parabola GNU/Linux-libre. Of particular interest to Parabola > developers, installing 'notsystemd' on an openrc system will allow > librechroot and libremakepkg to be used. > -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Sun Jun 18 17:16:35 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 13:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Dev] notsystemd v232.1 release announcement In-Reply-To: References: <87vanuq7ls.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Message-ID: <8ad989ec-5bc2-e965-7a5d-7075f4d7b18c@openmailbox.org> Ah, sth. else to point out, is the fact that as it conflicts the package eudev-systemd (because it provides systemd) it breaks its dependency for sddm-consolekit, I just putted --asume-installed eudev-systemd, and it works ok, so I think that it's easier to remove eudev-systemd from sddm-consolekit's dependencies El 18/06/17 a las 13:01, Megver83 escribi?: > this is simply great, I could even create an ARM chroot in my OpenRC OS, > thank you a lot lukeshu!! > > It's time to update the documentation in the wiki, I'll do that. > > El 17/06/17 a las 23:48, Luke Shumaker escribi?: >> I am pleased to announce the initial release of "notsystemd". It's a >> bit late (I had promised it by the end of May), but it's here! >> >> notsystemd is a project to turn the various components of systemd into >> independent pieces that can be used no matter which software is used >> for PID 1; in a similar spirit to eudev or elogind. This release >> focuses on the systemd-nspawn utility. >> >> At a minimum, the following utilities from notsystemd should be >> functional on non-systemd systems: >> >> systemd-nspawn >> systemd-machine-id-setup >> systemd-tmpfiles >> systemd-sysusers >> >> The sources are at https://repo.parabola.nu/other/notsystemd/ >> >> Pre-built packages have been released to the [libre] repository for >> Parabola GNU/Linux-libre. Of particular interest to Parabola >> developers, installing 'notsystemd' on an openrc system will allow >> librechroot and libremakepkg to be used. >> > -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net Mon Jun 19 05:51:13 2017 From: jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net (jc_gargma) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:51:13 -0700 Subject: [Dev] libretools and packaging - Was: Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <1497672694.1275.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> References: <20170614000103.1073.44231@proton.parabola.nu> <2647008.XLoXuN422g@iserlohn-fortress.net> <1497672694.1275.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Message-ID: <4197051.b9mjtzZ65N@iserlohn-fortress.net> Isaac David: > all good with your contributions thus far, thank you > for them. are you familiar with building packages > with libretools? maybe we should let you upgrade them > yourself. I have never used libretools before. Reading through the wiki guide, building with libretools does not sound too complicated. The scripts appear to handle all the harder parts, and the rest is similar to what I have already been doing. -jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From megver83 at openmailbox.org Mon Jun 19 19:55:41 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Dev] notsystemd v232.1 release announcement In-Reply-To: <8ad989ec-5bc2-e965-7a5d-7075f4d7b18c@openmailbox.org> References: <87vanuq7ls.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> <8ad989ec-5bc2-e965-7a5d-7075f4d7b18c@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <918d95b4-8388-f7b8-f923-aea0d33d52ca@openmailbox.org> El 18/06/17 a las 13:16, Megver83 escribi?: > Ah, sth. else to point out, is the fact that as it conflicts the package > eudev-systemd (because it provides systemd) it breaks its dependency for > sddm-consolekit, I just putted --asume-installed eudev-systemd, and it > works ok, so I think that it's easier to remove eudev-systemd from > sddm-consolekit's dependencies ^Why don't we better set eudev-systemd as a dependency for notystemd? There are no files that conflicts among them, and in this way eudev-systemd would be in charge of conflicting packages that provide systemd, because when packages conflict systemd they also conflicts eudev-systemd. Anyways I think in the future Manjaro will replace it with systemd-compat, but meanwhile Parabola uses eudev-systemd we can do what I proposed > El 18/06/17 a las 13:01, Megver83 escribi?: >> this is simply great, I could even create an ARM chroot in my OpenRC OS, >> thank you a lot lukeshu!! >> >> It's time to update the documentation in the wiki, I'll do that. >> >> El 17/06/17 a las 23:48, Luke Shumaker escribi?: >>> I am pleased to announce the initial release of "notsystemd". It's a >>> bit late (I had promised it by the end of May), but it's here! >>> >>> notsystemd is a project to turn the various components of systemd into >>> independent pieces that can be used no matter which software is used >>> for PID 1; in a similar spirit to eudev or elogind. This release >>> focuses on the systemd-nspawn utility. >>> >>> At a minimum, the following utilities from notsystemd should be >>> functional on non-systemd systems: >>> >>> systemd-nspawn >>> systemd-machine-id-setup >>> systemd-tmpfiles >>> systemd-sysusers >>> >>> The sources are at https://repo.parabola.nu/other/notsystemd/ >>> >>> Pre-built packages have been released to the [libre] repository for >>> Parabola GNU/Linux-libre. Of particular interest to Parabola >>> developers, installing 'notsystemd' on an openrc system will allow >>> librechroot and libremakepkg to be used. >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mr.j.spam.me at gmail.com Tue Jun 20 04:32:45 2017 From: mr.j.spam.me at gmail.com (Bill Auger) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Dev] the 'your-privacy' blacklisting process should be more rigorous Message-ID: i intended to raise the question of whether the 'your-privacy' package should be included in the parabola 'base' and 'base-openrc' packages - however after taking a closer look at it today, it seems to me whatever processes or criteria used are not very thoughtful - clearly these are not so straight-forward as licensing issues of 'your-freedom' but i think there is much room for improvement here especially regarding the information explaining the rationale for blacklisting any particular package - even with freedom issues, parabola has tended to take a zealous approach at the first sign of doubt without requiring proof, as demonstrated by the recent chromium controversy - although the hard-line approach may appear admirable to some, such actions should be immediately followed up with some responsible investigation, validation, and most importantly for transparency: a report on the findings and final decision of at least one paragraph long - there should probably be an entire wiki page devoted to this and it should be standard protocol for any blacklisted package - currently the only documentation required or recommended for a blacklisted package is a single line "original-package:[libre-replacement]:[ref]:[id]:short description" in the blacklist.txt file itself (per: https://wiki.parabola.nu/How_to_Blacklist_a_package) this lack of documentation is most clear on the 'your-privacy' blacklist - currently, most of the blacklisted packages say only "provides support for unsafe and dangerous for privacy services" - but that is not more than a re-iteration of the description of the the 'your-privacy' package itself: "This package will remove support for protocols and services known to endanger privacy." - even so, "provides support for" is not a valid implication - the mere fact that your PC has a network card installed with it's driver loaded "provides support for unsafe and dangerous for privacy services" - i personally am very dis-satisfied with such vague justification - another example is the description of the 'your-freedom_emu' blacklist which not indicate anything that would justify it: "This package removes emulators that runs free games and/or OS technically." - "... runs free games and/or OS ..." is clearly not a problem so i suspect there is a more valid explanation lurking here that was unfortunately left un-said i propose that each of those blacklisted programs should have a detailed explanation as to what precisely are its problematical points - they should also indicate whether or not a replacement exists in the 'libre' or 'non-prism' repos and perhaps with a link to any relevant discussion that took place regarding that package and ideally pointing at the actual non-free components or privacy invading mechanism in the code itself - in cases where no replacement exists it would be reasonable to say why that is so (either it is technically not possible or simply no one has had the time to do it yet) - in the latter case it could also be added to the under-utilized "Package Todo List" https://www.parabola.nu/todo/ which currently has exactly 3 items on it from 2010 - without such information only the person who blacklisted the package knows why and so it will probably never be rescued From andreas at grapentin.org Tue Jun 20 04:45:06 2017 From: andreas at grapentin.org (Andreas Grapentin) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:45:06 +0200 Subject: [Dev] the 'your-privacy' blacklisting process should be more rigorous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20170620044506.GA8493@parabola-pocket.localdomain> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:32:45AM -0400, Bill Auger wrote: > i propose that each of those blacklisted programs should have a > detailed explanation as to what precisely are its problematical points > - they should also indicate whether or not a replacement exists in the > 'libre' or 'non-prism' repos and perhaps with a link to any relevant > discussion that took place regarding that package and ideally pointing > at the actual non-free components or privacy invading mechanism in the > code itself - in cases where no replacement exists it would be > reasonable to say why that is so (either it is technically not > possible or simply no one has had the time to do it yet) - in the > latter case it could also be added to the under-utilized "Package Todo > List" https://www.parabola.nu/todo/ which currently has exactly 3 > items on it from 2010 - without such information only the person who > blacklisted the package knows why and so it will probably never be > rescued +1 to this entire proposal. I would just add that there should also be a wiki page outlining the process of blacklisting packages that explicitly states these documentation requirements, to make the process more fluid in the future. -A -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mr.j.spam.me at gmail.com Tue Jun 20 05:22:36 2017 From: mr.j.spam.me at gmail.com (Bill Auger) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 01:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Dev] the 'your-privacy' blacklisting process should be more rigorous In-Reply-To: <20170620044506.GA8493@parabola-pocket.localdomain> References: <20170620044506.GA8493@parabola-pocket.localdomain> Message-ID: On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Andreas Grapentin wrote: > > I would just add that there should also be a wiki page outlining the > process of blacklisting packages that explicitly states these > documentation requirements, to make the process more fluid in the > future. > such a page already exists but as for documentation it requires only s a single line in the blacklist.txt file itself https://wiki.parabola.nu/How_to_Blacklist_a_package From lkcl at lkcl.net Tue Jun 20 10:20:25 2017 From: lkcl at lkcl.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:20:25 +0100 Subject: [Dev] [Arm-netbook] early access EOMA68 to hardware for parabola ARM maintainers? In-Reply-To: <20170511063426.GA4252@parabola-pocket.localdomain> References: <20170427045240.GA1882@parabola-pocket.localdomain> <20170504134015.GA12968@parabola-pocket.localdomain> <20170511063426.GA4252@parabola-pocket.localdomain> Message-ID: hiya folks, whilst preparing an early 2.7.4 sample i tried the parabola image that i have here, which worked well back in june-august 2016 and i have not updated since. alongside XFCE4 i deployed eudev and openrc and it works extremely effectively (and provides a faster boot time). when endeavouring to do an update there were two key conflicts, related to udev, systemd and mesa-gl attempting to be upgraded. the upgrade could therefore not proceed. now, i *might* have a micro-sd card which has the full XFCE4 pre-tested image on it: around that time i remember losing a couple of pre-prepared images due to sdcard corruption thanks to NAND IC interference. if i can find it that is what will have to go out... but it will *not be upgradeable*. could someone (on parabola) please check this out and see what's going on? http://systemd-free.org/install.php many many thanks, l. From andreas at grapentin.org Tue Jun 20 10:29:01 2017 From: andreas at grapentin.org (Andreas Grapentin) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:29:01 +0200 Subject: [Dev] [Arm-netbook] early access EOMA68 to hardware for parabola ARM maintainers? In-Reply-To: References: <20170427045240.GA1882@parabola-pocket.localdomain> <20170504134015.GA12968@parabola-pocket.localdomain> <20170511063426.GA4252@parabola-pocket.localdomain> Message-ID: <20170620102901.GA30848@parabola-pocket.localdomain> Hi Luke, On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:20:25AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > when endeavouring to do an update there were two key conflicts, > related to udev, systemd and mesa-gl attempting to be upgraded. the > upgrade could therefore not proceed. could you give us access to the image you used? that would make it easier to find the issues. However, due to some changes in arch, there is currently no clean upgrade path from 2016 images that does not require manual intervention. See here: https://www.archlinux.org/news/ca-certificates-utils-20170307-1-upgrade-requires-manual-intervention/ there might be some more of these that I forgot. Best, -Andreas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Wed Jun 21 18:16:46 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Dev] outdated 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon In-Reply-To: <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> References: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> Message-ID: <1498069006.1223.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Robert Alessi : > Hi, > > Is there any progress on this? For the time being, staying out of > prism also means staying out of gnome... :( > > Robert > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 06:16:37PM +0200, Robert Alessi wrote: >> Hi Devs, >> >> Since the update of gnome to v3.24.2, I can't any longer log into >> gnome, nor can I use gdm. >> >> Since I use the 'nonprism' repository, I guess the culprit may be >> the 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon version which is still at >> v3.22.1. >> >> Can anybody look into this issue? >> >> Many thanks in anticipation! >> >> Robert updated gnome-online-accounts and gnome-settings-daemon to their respective latest versions. my own test of them went smooth. some other gnome packages in [nonprism] (e.g. empathy, evolution-data-server, gnome-weather, grilo-plugins) require need some attention. -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C From alessi at robertalessi.net Thu Jun 22 11:53:43 2017 From: alessi at robertalessi.net (Robert Alessi) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:53:43 +0200 Subject: [Dev] outdated 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon In-Reply-To: <1498069006.1223.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> References: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> <1498069006.1223.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Message-ID: <20170622115343.GA2770@riseup.net> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 01:16:46PM -0500, Isaac David wrote: > > updated gnome-online-accounts and gnome-settings-daemon to their > respective latest versions. my own test of them went smooth. Since this update, things are getting better on my laptop too: gnome seemingly starts, but ends up with a blank screen. Nothing is frozen though for gvim which is set to pop up my reminders shows up as expected?but with no decorations. Guake also works, but that's about it. I tried the standard version of gnome-settings-daemon which is in extra/ and I can tell that everything works with it. > some other gnome packages in [nonprism] (e.g. empathy, > evolution-data-server, gnome-weather, grilo-plugins) require need some > attention. But they do not cause this issue in conjunction with gnome-settings-daemon, do they? Many thanks for the improvements so far! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info Thu Jun 22 22:34:15 2017 From: isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info (Isaac David) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Dev] outdated 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon In-Reply-To: <20170622115343.GA2770@riseup.net> References: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> <1498069006.1223.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <20170622115343.GA2770@riseup.net> Message-ID: <1498170855.1196.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Robert Alessi : > Since this update, things are getting better on my laptop too: gnome > seemingly starts, but ends up with a blank screen. Nothing is frozen > though for gvim which is set to pop up my reminders shows up as > expected?but with no decorations. Guake also works, but that's > about > it. so you could get past gdm, right? i tried to reproduce with a full dive into [nonprism] (`pacman -Syyuu your-privacy`) instead of just replacing the 2 packages, but in my case i was greeted with a borked gdm which didn't show anything apart from the pointer. > I tried the standard version of gnome-settings-daemon which is in > extra/ and I can tell that everything works with it. which pulled geoclue2 as dep, right? i don't know how similar our experiences are, but this bit right here would also make sense to mine. i'll explain... >> some other gnome packages in [nonprism] (e.g. empathy, >> evolution-data-server, gnome-weather, grilo-plugins) require need >> some >> attention. > > But they do not cause this issue in conjunction with > gnome-settings-daemon, do they? apparently not. i uninstalled them in full, one by one, and at no point did gdm work. doesn't imply they aren't required in updated form, but here comes the interesting part: i put 'em back, then i restored the stuff that your-privacy originally conflicted with, one at a time. _i could recover gnome when geoclue2 was present_, no need for extra/gnome-settings-daemon. could you try this combination? this would mean there's another dependency on geoclue2 we must get rid of, somewhere. -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 Tox: 0C730E0156E96E6193A1445D413557FF5F277BA969A4EA20AC9352889D3B390E77651E816F0C From alessi at robertalessi.net Thu Jun 22 23:39:25 2017 From: alessi at robertalessi.net (Robert Alessi) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:39:25 +0200 Subject: [Dev] outdated 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon In-Reply-To: <1498170855.1196.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> References: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> <1498069006.1223.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <20170622115343.GA2770@riseup.net> <1498170855.1196.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> Message-ID: <20170622233925.GA2555@riseup.net> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:34:15PM -0500, Isaac David wrote: > Robert Alessi : > > Since this update, things are getting better on my laptop too: gnome > > seemingly starts, but ends up with a blank screen. Nothing is frozen > > though for gvim which is set to pop up my reminders shows up as > > expected?but with no decorations. Guake also works, but that's about > > it. > > so you could get past gdm, right? > > i tried to reproduce with a full dive into [nonprism] (`pacman -Syyuu > your-privacy`) instead of just replacing the 2 packages, but in my > case i was greeted with a borked gdm which didn't show anything apart > from the pointer. Sorry, I wasn't specific enough on that point: no, gdm stopped working in my case too, so I had to switch to lightdm for gdm just showed the pointer. Same as you. > > I tried the standard version of gnome-settings-daemon which is in > > extra/ and I can tell that everything works with it. > > which pulled geoclue2 as dep, right? i don't know how similar our > experiences are, but this bit right here would also make sense to > mine. i'll explain... quite right: more below... > > > some other gnome packages in [nonprism] (e.g. empathy, > > > evolution-data-server, gnome-weather, grilo-plugins) require need > > > some > > > attention. > > > > But they do not cause this issue in conjunction with > > gnome-settings-daemon, do they? > > apparently not. i uninstalled them in full, one by one, and at no > point did gdm work. doesn't imply they aren't required in updated > form, but here comes the interesting part: i put 'em back, then i > restored the stuff that your-privacy originally conflicted with, one > at a time. _i could recover gnome when geoclue2 was present_, no need > for extra/gnome-settings-daemon. > > could you try this combination? this would mean there's another > dependency on geoclue2 we must get rid of, somewhere. For the time being, here's what I did: - keeping nonprism/gnome-settings-daemon, "pacman -Syu geoclue2", which just took out 'your-privacy' without touching any of the already installed nonprism packages. Et voila, everything worked perfectly, gdm included! - then reverted to the previous state with "pacman -Syu your-privacy", which of course took out geoclue2, and broke either gdm and gnome. This little expermiment leads me to the conclusion that, as you said, the latest nonprism/gnome-settings-daemon is fine. There must be some other culprit lying somewhere in need to be nonprismed. What do you think? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alessi at robertalessi.net Thu Jun 22 23:47:23 2017 From: alessi at robertalessi.net (Robert Alessi) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:47:23 +0200 Subject: [Dev] outdated 'nonprism' gnome-settings-daemon In-Reply-To: <20170622233925.GA2555@riseup.net> References: <20170512161637.GA2273@robertalessi.net> <20170617141834.GA2147@riseup.net> <1498069006.1223.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <20170622115343.GA2770@riseup.net> <1498170855.1196.0@plebeian.isacdaavid.info> <20170622233925.GA2555@riseup.net> Message-ID: <20170622234723.GB2555@riseup.net> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:39:25AM +0200, Robert Alessi wrote: > - then reverted to the previous state with "pacman -Syu your-privacy", > which of course took out geoclue2, and broke either gdm and gnome. s/either/both/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nobody at parabola.nu Sat Jun 24 23:59:54 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 23:59:54 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [mesa] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170624235954.1111.62319@proton.parabola.nu> robot at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * mesa 17.1.2-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/mesa/ * mesa 17.1.2-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/mesa/ The user provided the following additional text: 17.1.3 has been released. From lukeshu at lukeshu.com Wed Jun 28 01:14:04 2017 From: lukeshu at lukeshu.com (Luke Shumaker) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Strange libremakepkg error In-Reply-To: <267816a8-9186-5f42-491c-14a884a826a0@openmailbox.org> References: <267816a8-9186-5f42-491c-14a884a826a0@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <87o9t89an7.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Hey, sorry I missed this message. On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:45:00 -0400, Megver83 wrote: > Hi, I'm having a strange issue when running libremakepkg. > > $ sudo libremakepkg -n chroot1 > ==> Initializing the chroot... > | /usr/sbin/librechroot: line 69: Binary: command not found > > Why does it tries to run such command? For some reason grep thinks $chrootdir/etc/makepkg.conf is a binary file. So for one thing, `-a` should be passed to grep. I'll fix that in git. But what's in your makepkg.conf that makes it look binary? -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From lukeshu at lukeshu.com Wed Jun 28 01:21:29 2017 From: lukeshu at lukeshu.com (Luke Shumaker) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Strange libremakepkg error In-Reply-To: <87o9t89an7.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> References: <267816a8-9186-5f42-491c-14a884a826a0@openmailbox.org> <87o9t89an7.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Message-ID: <87mv8s9aau.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:14:04 -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:45:00 -0400, > Megver83 wrote: > > | /usr/sbin/librechroot: line 69: Binary: command not found > > For some reason grep thinks $chrootdir/etc/makepkg.conf is a binary > file. So for one thing, `-a` should be passed to grep. I'll fix that > in git. But what's in your makepkg.conf that makes it look binary? If you could attach or upload your chroot's makepkg.conf that causes this, it would be very helpful. The `grep -a` thing needs to be fixed in two places: librechroot and arch-nspawn; for arch-nspawn I would very much like to send that change upstream to Arch so that I don't have to maintain a patch. And knowledge of a scenario that could cause it to make a difference would be very helpful in justifying the change to Jan. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From nobody at parabola.nu Wed Jun 28 17:55:34 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:55:34 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [khotkeys] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170628175534.1110.52709@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * khotkeys 5.10.2-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/khotkeys/ * khotkeys 5.10.2-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/khotkeys/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.10.3 From nobody at parabola.nu Wed Jun 28 17:55:51 2017 From: nobody at parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:55:51 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kinfocenter] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20170628175551.1110.8851@proton.parabola.nu> jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kinfocenter 5.10.2-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kinfocenter/ * kinfocenter 5.10.2-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kinfocenter/ The user provided the following additional text: Current release is 5.10.3 From tirifto at posteo.cz Wed Jun 28 15:06:18 2017 From: tirifto at posteo.cz (Tirifto) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:06:18 +0200 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman Message-ID: <1498662378.3.2.camel@posteo.cz> Hello all! I have completed the Esperanto (eo) translation for pacman2pacman. Please find the file as an attachment. Some of the existing sentences were corrected or slightly rephrased, and straight quotation marks ("") were replaced by guillemets (??). Hopefully that won't be a problem. Gtranslator always crashed upon save with this file. This didn't happen with other files so far. (Just in case it's useful information.) Best wishes // Tirifto P.S.: Sorry if this ends in a wrong thread. List novice here. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pacman2pacman-get.po Type: text/x-gettext-translation Size: 1503 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From alessi at robertalessi.net Thu Jun 29 09:02:41 2017 From: alessi at robertalessi.net (Robert Alessi) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:02:41 +0200 Subject: [Dev] mkinitcpio-busybox is broken Message-ID: <20170629090241.GA10192@riseup.net> Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the latest mkinitcpio-busybox (1.26.1-1) broke everything on my system this morning (thinkpad X60s, so i686, with fully encrypted HD). After the update, I simply could not reboot: after being informed that the resume device cannot be found, I ended up with the rescue shell. I had to reboot with Parabola CD-ROM, then mount my encrypted volume, then chroot and finally revert to mkinicpio-busybox 1.25.1-2, which solved the issue. Robert -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joseph at xylon.me.uk Thu Jun 29 20:53:14 2017 From: joseph at xylon.me.uk (Joseph Graham) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:53:14 +0100 Subject: [Dev] translations needed for pacman2pacman In-Reply-To: <1498662378.3.2.camel@posteo.cz> References: <1498662378.3.2.camel@posteo.cz> Message-ID: <20170629205314.GA626@avalon-parabola.home> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:06:18PM +0200, Tirifto wrote: > I have completed the Esperanto (eo) translation for pacman2pacman. Thankyou! I'll add it when I get a minute. -- Joseph Graham, techno-philosopher and Free Software advocate. My PGP key: 0x8cd7227da467d3ed404f6eefdb590f739e5ac458 I have a blog: http://www.naughtycomputer.uk/ I write software: https://www.suckmore.uk/ I run a web forum: https://www.freesoftwareuk.org.uk/ And a platform for Free Software success stories: http://www.freedcomputer.net/ From megver83 at openmailbox.org Thu Jun 29 23:43:04 2017 From: megver83 at openmailbox.org (Megver83) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Dev] Strange libremakepkg error In-Reply-To: <87mv8s9aau.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> References: <267816a8-9186-5f42-491c-14a884a826a0@openmailbox.org> <87o9t89an7.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> <87mv8s9aau.wl-lukeshu@lukeshu.com> Message-ID: <863c8c86-ed9a-926e-147a-351e0c681c7d@openmailbox.org> El 27/06/17 a las 21:21, Luke Shumaker escribi?: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:14:04 -0400, > Luke Shumaker wrote: >> >> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:45:00 -0400, >> Megver83 wrote: >>> | /usr/sbin/librechroot: line 69: Binary: command not found >> >> For some reason grep thinks $chrootdir/etc/makepkg.conf is a binary >> file. So for one thing, `-a` should be passed to grep. I'll fix that >> in git. But what's in your makepkg.conf that makes it look binary? No idea, finally I ended up removing and re-creating the chroot. > > If you could attach or upload your chroot's makepkg.conf that causes > this, it would be very helpful. The `grep -a` thing needs to be fixed > in two places: librechroot and arch-nspawn; for arch-nspawn I would > very much like to send that change upstream to Arch so that I don't > have to maintain a patch. And knowledge of a scenario that could > cause it to make a difference would be very helpful in justifying the > change to Jan. > If it happens again, I'll attach it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 520 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: