[Dev] QTWebengine compliance with FSDG

Luke g4jc at openmailbox.org
Tue Jan 24 22:41:39 GMT 2017


On 01/24/2017 10:06 PM, fauno wrote:
> Luke <g4jc at openmailbox.org> writes:
>
>> Hello,
> nice guys over at qtengine, uh? :)
>
> i'm not clear if the question of unclear or missing licenses in source
> files is already answered or not...
>
I believe that is only an upstream issue, per Isaac who actually went
through the report and found false positives:
https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-January/004697.html


However, that doesn't exclude the fact were are shipping proprietary
codecs right now:
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/qt5-webengine#n44


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170124/fc9a6ed9/attachment.bin>


More information about the Dev mailing list