[Dev] problems with replacements for blacklisted packages

bill-auger bill-auger at peers.community
Thu Dec 21 07:20:07 GMT 2017

i do not know the answer to any of those questions but it is good that
you looked into it so thoroughly - one thing i have been recommending
for is to ensure that each blacklisted or replaced package has some
meaningful description noting (however tersely) some rationale as to why
it was originally declared to be the non-free status that it has and how
any libre replacements address the issue

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20171221/99b5d8db/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list