[Dev] Policy for Package Quarantines

Nicolás A. Ortega deathsbreed at themusicinnoise.net
Wed Apr 19 17:57:01 GMT 2017

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:34:00AM -0700, jc_gargma wrote:
> > So far (aside from some spelling and grammatical mistakes I had) someone
> > also commented that apart from links to sources as to why something
> > should be removed (or rather, stay removed since this is a quarantine)
> > one should be able to post information about the code directly that is
> > in question. I kind of thought this was a given, but this should be okay
> > as well.
> > 
> > However, aside from this one comment, I am unsure if people generally
> > agree or if people simply have not been going over it. I would like
> > community input since I think this would help to make freedom issues
> > more efficient.
> I'm unable to view the pad as it produces multiple javascript errors.
> In response to your main query:
> I would consider explicit code snippets or statements akin to "lines X through 
> Y on file Z of commit W" to avoid posting non-free code, as a given to justify 
> whether software is non-free.
> -jc

Yes, that is what someone mentioned on the pad as well (although you put
it much more clearly, so I'll add it if you haven't already).

Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed)
Public PGP Key:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170419/3fa838ef/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list