[Dev] Policy for Package Quarantines

jc_gargma jc_gargma at iserlohn-fortress.net
Wed Apr 19 17:34:00 GMT 2017

> So far (aside from some spelling and grammatical mistakes I had) someone
> also commented that apart from links to sources as to why something
> should be removed (or rather, stay removed since this is a quarantine)
> one should be able to post information about the code directly that is
> in question. I kind of thought this was a given, but this should be okay
> as well.
> However, aside from this one comment, I am unsure if people generally
> agree or if people simply have not been going over it. I would like
> community input since I think this would help to make freedom issues
> more efficient.

I'm unable to view the pad as it produces multiple javascript errors.

In response to your main query:
I would consider explicit code snippets or statements akin to "lines X through 
Y on file Z of commit W" to avoid posting non-free code, as a given to justify 
whether software is non-free.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20170419/7ea60f57/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list