[Dev] Q1: Do you have a consensus on the budget for the Build Server?
g4jc at openmailbox.org
Mon Apr 17 21:38:39 GMT 2017
On 04/14/2017 05:44 PM, fauno wrote:
> Josh Branning <lovell.joshyyy at gmail.com> writes:
>> Really, it's up to GC4J to choose to what entity the build server will
>> be donated to, if it is to be donated.
> so a few issues to be solved:
> * is g4jc build server donation a donation to parabola or to
The donation is intended for Emulatorman (since he is currently the one
maintaining kernels and has access to fiber). Assuming that Emulatorman
remains with Parabola (current consensus seems that way), it will
benefit Parabola which still is the intention.
> * if it's a donation to parabola, do we give it to emulatorman to host
> or some other parabola hacker could host it instead?
> * do we want to pay the shipment price? does it still amount to 400
Since it will be shipping within the US the shipping does not equal $400
USD. It should cost < $300.
In any case, it is my understanding that the money is temporarily
'frozen' until a new sponsor is found. So, I will pay for the shipping.
> * do we want to buy an ups to accompany this build server?
It would be nice, but I assume this is something that can be bought
locally. It may also be possible to buy a used one and replace the
battery at a reduced cost.
> * who will have remote access to this build server?
All core developers should have access to the build server, but I am not
sure that everyone needs sudo. It may be possible to simply "queue" jobs
for the server to do.
I know lukeshu has some good ideas on this, so I like forward to seeing
what he may have in mind. It may also be useful to have an audit log of
commands which are run on the server and by whom to avoid confusion and
> * other questions people can have
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dev