[Dev] [consensus] Features vs. Privacy in nonprism repo
g4jc at openmailbox.org
Wed Oct 26 22:35:11 GMT 2016
On 10/26/2016 03:43 PM, Alejandro Hernández wrote:
> I have to say that as an user I had no idea about the existence of a
> 'nonprism' repo. So I think the repo should be available by default to
> the users. Just the same way 'pcr' should be. 👈
> 'nonprism' repo is the result of the developers' job and it is a great
> feature for the defense of the user rights. 👈
> Sorry if I'm out of date.
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
Thank you for your comments, you're slightly out of date but just in
time for a new consensus. :)
I will be making a new letter to the mailing list concerning the depth
of nonprism and a meta package suggestion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Dev