[Dev] [consensus] Features vs. Privacy in nonprism repo

Luke g4jc at openmailbox.org
Wed Oct 26 22:35:11 GMT 2016

On 10/26/2016 03:43 PM, Alejandro Hernández wrote:
> I have to say that as an user I had no idea about the existence of a
> 'nonprism' repo. So I think the repo should be available by default to
> the users. Just the same way 'pcr' should be. 👈
> 'nonprism' repo is the result of the developers' job and it is a great
> feature for the defense of the user rights. 👈
> ...
> Sorry if I'm out of date.
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Thank you for your comments, you're slightly out of date but just in
time for a new consensus. :)

I will be making a new letter to the mailing list concerning the depth
of nonprism and a meta package suggestion.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20161026/a6419559/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list