[Dev] [consensus] Features vs. Privacy in nonprism repo

[Joshua Haase]

Luke <g4jc at openmailbox.org> writes:

> _- So this puts the nonprism projects at a crossroads. Do we want to
> favour accessibility and "features" over "privacy"?_

I think non-prism should be expected to favour privacy and break sites
where needed.

> From my personal opinion, nonprism should provide security and privacy
> by default. Users can choose to opt-out of nonprism if they wish. This
> is easily done by A) not using nonprism, or B) using about:config and/or
> user.js to override the settings.

I'd rather have nonprism as opt-in.

When using Parabola GNU/Linux-libre you customize your system and it's
trivial to change your packages from [libre] to [nonprism].