[Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
flodiaz81 at riseup.net
Sun Jun 12 08:13:13 GMT 2016
El 12/06/16 a las 01:54, lukeshu at sbcglobal.net escribió:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 00:00:38 -0400,
> Luke wrote:
>> On 06/11/2016 11:42 PM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>>> 5. **Parabola and Arch Linux**: Parabola will produce an operating
>>> system that is a Free version of the GNU/Linux system "[Arch
>>> Linux](http://www.archlinux.org/)" and possibly other
>>> Arch-based systems. We will provide repositories and installation
>>> media without any non-Free software. All Parabola operating systems
>>> will be backward compatible with the system they are based on, as to
>>> help liberate already working installations. We will respect the
>>> design philosophies of the systems ours are based on, to reduce
>>> friction from both developer and user viewpoints.
>> Overall the new layout you proposed seems reasonable, however I'm
>> pretty sure that consensus was to not call it "Arch Linux" at all.
>> This is in order to remain in good standing with the GNU project.
>> Per a previous e-mail from RMS:
>>> In this case, you have to choose to give this kind of respect
>>> either to the developers of Arch GNU/Linux or to the GNU Project.
>>> Respecting the former means joining them in disrespecting us.
> I replied to RMS's email with essentially the wording that I included
> in this version. Unfortunately, he didn't reply directly to mine..
>>>> What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
>>> It avoids endorsing the error, so it is ok.
> I think that the version I submitted also avoids endorsing the error.
> Perhaps change the heading to just "Arch" and leave "Arch Linux" for
> in the body?
We are deciding by consensus that is good call it "Arch (the GNU/Linux
distribution)", not "Arch Linux". Even Richard Stallman is agree about
it, please no more fighting between us, we are part from the same
distribution and community.
More information about the Dev