[Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
emulatorman at riseup.net
Fri Jun 10 22:18:55 GMT 2016
On 06/10/2016 06:25 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote:
>> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400,
>>> Richard Stallman wrote:
>>>> > 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name
>>>> > given to it by its developers.
>>>> In this case, you have to choose to give this kind of respect
>>>> either to the developers of Arch GNU/Linux or to the GNU Project.
>>>> Respecting the former means joining them in disrespecting us.
>> It is my propose to solve it:
>> 4. **Parabola and Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)**:
>> We will develop an operating system that is a free
>> version of the GNU/Linux system from "Arch" project
>> and possibly other Arch-based systems. ...
Even in my proposal we should use 'Arch GNU/Linux' or 'Arch (the
GNU/Linux distribution)' as the former Arch operating system name in
Parabola project, not just our Social Contract.
'Arch Linux' is a misnomer, because the system is GNU/Linux and
Nomenclature page  needs expansion to explain that we will use the
correct name 'Arch GNU/Linux' or 'Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)'
because we are giving this kind of respect to the GNU Project.
In FSDG , specifically in "Please Avoid Repeating Propaganda and
Confusion" says about list of words to avoid, in that list explains
about Linux system as word to avoid 
Parabola is a endorsed distro by FSF and it should avoid propaganda and
confusion, even if Parabola talks about another distros (eg. Arch,
Ubuntu, Suse, etc) inside the project.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Dev