[Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

Crazytoon crazytoon at riseup.net
Fri Jun 10 02:44:02 GMT 2016


El 09/06/16 a las 20:46, André Silva escribió:
> On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>>
>>> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will
>>> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux',
>>> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard
>>> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem.
>>
>> What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
> 
> +1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the
> Social Contract.

+1

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160609/c9874b1b/attachment.sig>


More information about the Dev mailing list