[Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news

[Paul Kocialkowski]

Le mardi 16 août 2016 à 20:34 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) a écrit :
> (“Respects your freedom” would be equally fuzzy if it were not certified
> according to clear criteria.)

On that, I disagree. Freedom in technology has a very precise definition, and
respecting that definition is very binary and straightforward. I don't see
what's fuzzy about it.

The FSF's RYF certification is instead adding layers of compromises (and also
mixing a bunch of other aspects in the bag). So I certainly wouldn't mix
"respects your freedom" and "the FSF's respect your freedom certification".

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, developer of low-level free software for embedded devices

Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160816/7204028a/attachment.sig>