[Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-08-10] increasing security in Parabola, servers

Luke g4jc at openmailbox.org
Mon Aug 1 23:15:09 GMT 2016

On 08/01/2016 07:04 PM, fauno wrote:
> André Silva <emulatorman at riseup.net> writes:
>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>> On 08/01/2016 07:23 PM, André Silva wrote:
>>>>> * Testing against all type of attacks to check our security settings is ok.
>>>> +1. We should have someone audit the server for any vulnerabilities.
>>> +1, i suggest use linux-libre-audit for it.
>> In this case, since it is a server, i could create a modified version of
>> linux-libre-lts with AUDIT support called linux-libre-lts-audit, what do
>> you think guys?
> what about grsec?
grsec would probably be better for the server, but what does the audit
kernel do? I meant literally audit it, as in run nmap and other tools to
scan for vulnerabilities...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160801/cb434817/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list