[Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-08-10] increasing security in Parabola, servers

fauno fauno at endefensadelsl.org
Mon Aug 1 23:04:15 GMT 2016

André Silva <emulatorman at riseup.net> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On 08/01/2016 07:23 PM, André Silva wrote:
>>>> * Testing against all type of attacks to check our security settings is ok.
>>> +1. We should have someone audit the server for any vulnerabilities.
>> +1, i suggest use linux-libre-audit for it.
> In this case, since it is a server, i could create a modified version of
> linux-libre-lts with AUDIT support called linux-libre-lts-audit, what do
> you think guys?

what about grsec?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 584 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20160801/9430a5d2/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list