[Dev] Let's revert and move changes introduced by bugs #645 and #677 on Iceweasel

[Jorge Araya Navarro]

It doesn't muddles anything but shows why the logic used to ban the feature is irrational in regard
to Free Software principles and goals.

Answering your question: Because it is useful.

El lunes 02 de noviembre del 2015 a las 0047 horas, fauno escribió:

> Jorge Araya Navarro <elcorreo at deshackra.com> writes:
>
>> Suspicion is good enough criteria, AFAIK.
>>
>> Again, dependency is not good enough reason. Dependency in a piece of hardware that requires
>> proprietary software to function is, on the other hand, good enough reason to replace *such*
>> hardware.
>>
>> But the server side of Firefox Hello do not affects my four freedoms. LibreJS exists because
>> proprietary Javascript runs in user's browsers, not because the stack of the servers visited by
>> those users runs the entire Parabola's black list.
>
> i was taling about the slippery slope precisely because using other
> stuff as examples muddles this particular discussion.
>
> so, why should we bring back hello to iceweasel?

-- 
👋 Pax et bonum.
Jorge Araya Navarro
https://es.gravatar.com/shackra