[Dev] gajim 0.16

[hellekin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 01/30/2015 10:09 AM, André Silva wrote:
> 
>> If you want i could build 0.15 version of gajim to [pcr] and rename
>> it as gajim-lts
>
*** That would require reviewing their code and ensuring there's no
security issue in 0.15.

> Also i have a question about it, is there a stable version of gajim?
> Maybe we could build a new one based on it.
>
*** 0.16 is the "stable" one.  Not sure they realized the regression yet.

But I'm more concerned about the conflict in the Python packages from
2.7 and 3.4.  Why is there a conflict between a file from python 2.7 and
one from python3.4?

==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUy6DiXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0
ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9crgP/3WSR4K3ZiZMgp9y32PPgC9y
qVAgUOND3PryEq1nzHPllxlZUyaJUNjd/Kh1DxNOqDeoekpdfCrMgsLMWR8OmNk/
CTR7W7oqf1qqxGui/Ls3JhHmGb67ZnV+0iJkcBFhs1TFIwOm2Cv8oUJtYz+wCDWW
JEeR91Uz1RGcAsSDeS/um3bitceArDeDiXCaplF8lrylKPMGfOX+kZVzJIOqKW02
htMah2vXnwMyeQFbqdJhM5n3V9OJLX/1Uy+0sSrLhut8Kjh3OXPYTl2eEV5HUHhY
tsavMJoq2WdmQUDgCuwDTQanoHh6ffV3LA7dktHZUXlLFLKrUfGdmnimBEzUbUVH
QTXV29DMkqC76Iosapc8ULE6UQFNt4IRp+58T+tT6pmAufXf/EaaxVInzTGZ1+mr
6C6qTQ8PkJh4G+Oq3U4cRTmGP1GoNr+7uyHYFLd7zgCTvpkpGbRGizPBhO9T4PMH
CUr91HzChVKubclYzFtk7cB8X1KR4vfIXqf7Po+nyG0bGbNgIn/V+A9eF+iQgFn4
xjTV//D6kcDp+HjB84SuWlBQ9juSns8x6BfiQuqoHeC3uZ0eEvtIz+CwyJnzmC/g
eAYZRX21P5BjK34oGrsoRMOEG+V36rdDw5tUSh/b7qG/rSIRsf+jtr3vYw/i8t+A
oNRWJ66HedERQGiGyn1q
=OCQb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----