[Dev] gajim 0.16

[André Silva]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 01/30/2015 11:06 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 03:06 AM, hellekin wrote:
>> Duh... I had a compiled version in /usr/local...  A splendid 
>> illustration of why one should not multitask: you forget about 
>> what you're doing.
> 
>> So, as I discovered that Gajim 0.16 did not let me in any 
>> conference room, I removed the package and try to compile it in 
>> order to figure out why that happened.  And with the compiled 
>> version, came the requirement for PyOpenSSL, and the conflict
>> with Python 3.4.
> 
>> So in any case, gajim 0.16 is problematic because MUC does not
>> work and gajim 0.15 or gajim source are not available for
>> compilation.
> 
>> == hk
> 
> 
> If you want i could build 0.15 version of gajim to [pcr] and rename
> it as gajim-lts
> 

Also i have a question about it, is there a stable version of gajim?
Maybe we could build a new one based on it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=LS8w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----