From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Sun Feb 1 06:36:29 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 06:36:29 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Pcr package [snort] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150201063629.850.25050@parabola.nu> elcorreo at deshackra.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * snort 2.9.7.0-3 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/snort/ * snort 2.9.3.1-1.1 [pcr] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/mips64el/snort/ * snort 2.9.7.0-3 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/snort/ The user provided the following additional text: ?signature from "Nicol?s Reynolds " is unknown trust? From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Sun Feb 1 19:15:12 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:15:12 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150201191512.850.32739@parabola.nu> someone at there.over wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * iceweasel 1:35.0.deb1-3 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/iceweasel/ * iceweasel 1:35.0.deb1-3 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/iceweasel/ * iceweasel-debug 1:35.0.deb1-3 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/iceweasel-debug/ * iceweasel-debug 1:35.0.deb1-3 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/iceweasel-debug/ The user provided the following additional text: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/i/iceweasel/iceweasel_35.0.1-1_changelog From distopico at riseup.net Mon Feb 2 23:49:36 2015 From: distopico at riseup.net (Distopico Vegan) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: Re: Iceweasel and AppManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8704f276a491504c4035e284bfb07c7d@riseup.net> Abrowser Trisquel settings... pref("devtools.webide.templatesURL", "https://code.cdn.mozilla.net/templates/list.json"); pref("devtools.webide.addonsURL", "https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/labs/fxos-simulator/index.json"); pref("devtools.webide.simulatorAddonsURL", "https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/labs/fxos-simulator/#VERSION#/#OS#/fxos_#SLASHED_VERSION#_simulator-#OS#-latest.xpi"); pref("devtools.webide.simulatorAddonID", "fxos_#SLASHED_VERSION#_simulator at mozilla.org"); pref("devtools.webide.adbAddonURL", "https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/labs/fxos-simulator/adb-helper/#OS#/adbhelper-#OS#-latest.xpi"); pref("devtools.webide.adbAddonID", "adbhelper at mozilla.org"); pref("devtools.webide.adaptersAddonURL", "https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/labs/fxdt-adapters/#OS#/fxdt-adapters-#OS#-latest.xpi"); pref("devtools.webide.adaptersAddonID", "fxdevtools-adapters at mozilla.org"); From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Tue Feb 3 14:04:56 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:04:56 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: [arch-dev-public] user/group management in packages Message-ID: <87pp9rjdkn.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> -- http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:27:14 +0200 From: Evangelos Foutras To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] user/group management in packages On 03/02/15 13:46, Allan McRae wrote: > Hi all, > > While looking into how best handle those directory permission warnings > with pacman-4.2, I have noticed a couple of things about user/group > management in our packages. > > 1) We should not remove users/groups when packages are uninstalled. This > is a potential security issue if any files are left owned by the > non-existent user/group. > > 2) Most packages that chown files in the install file could do it use > the user/group number in the PKGBUILD. This works on any package with a > reserved user/group ID. The advantage of doing this is that pacman can > track the permissions. (A solution is being worked on for dynamically > created user/groups whose id number can vary.) > > Should I create a rebuild list? I'd say yes and I agree on both points. This is also a perfect opportunity to mention systemd-sysusers(8) which, along with sysusers.d(5) entries, can greatly simplify the creation of system users. For an example, check out the openldap package: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/slapd.sysusers?h=packages/openldap https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/openldap.install?h=packages/openldap -------------------- End of forwarded message -------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Tue Feb 3 19:28:52 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:28:52 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: [hs] WebRTC puede estar mostrando tu IP real, a pesar de usar TOR o una VPN Message-ID: <8761bikd57.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> -- .o?) -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:16:10 +0100 From: epsylon To: hacktivistas at lists.riseup.net, hacktivistas Subject: [hs] WebRTC puede estar mostrando tu IP real, a pesar de usar TOR o una VPN Atenci?n, Chrome y Firefox pueden estar mostrando tu IP real, debido a un fallo en la configuraci?n de WebRTC. Hay que tener cuidado con ?sto, porque usar una VPN o un nodo de salida de TOR, puede no ser suficiente para no revelar tu origen. Para resolverlo, lo primero, hay que ir a comprobar que ?sta revelando tu navegador cuando navegas, por ejemplo, en el siguiente enlace: http://ipleak.net/ Y si, a pesar de estar navegando con una VPN o TOR, ves tu IP real en el campo: "Your IP address - WebRTC detection", es porque tienes la opci?n RTCPeerConnection habilitada. Para desactivarla, hay que poner About:Config en la barra de direcciones y cambiar la opci?n por defecto: media.peerconnection.enabled a False. _______________________________________________ Hacktivistas mailing list Hacktivistas at listas.sindominio.net https://listas.sindominio.net/mailman/listinfo/hacktivistas -------------------- End of forwarded message -------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Tue Feb 3 22:38:58 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:38:58 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kodi] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150203223858.850.66423@parabola.nu> biserangeloff at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kodi 14.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kodi/ * kodi 14.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kodi/ The user provided the following additional text: There is a bugfix 14.1 release of kodi http://kodi.tv/kodi-14-1-helix-bugfix-release/ From lukeshu at sbcglobal.net Thu Feb 5 19:48:47 2015 From: lukeshu at sbcglobal.net (Luke Shumaker) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Dev] [abslibre.git] Pull request In-Reply-To: <1422565531.1072.1.camel@riseup.net> References: <1422477280.921.5.camel@riseup.net> <874mr9cq2n.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> <1422565531.1072.1.camel@riseup.net> Message-ID: <87lhkccf6o.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> At Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:05:31 +0100, Daniel Milewski wrote: > I made both changes and pushed them to Gitorious. Looks good! I've merged the changes and pushed the packages to repo! Sorry for the delay! -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Sat Feb 7 00:55:18 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:55:18 -0300 Subject: [Dev] KingOfTheJews is +q'ed on #parabola Message-ID: <87r3u2czgp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> i'm attaching the log that led to me setting +q mode to KingOfTheJews as per the irc policy[^1]. i've received some abuse in private too but i don't mind. [^1]: https://wiki.parabola.nu/IRC_Policy -- P) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: kingofthejews.log URL: -------------- next part -------------- < -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Sat Feb 7 16:39:36 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:39:36 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure Message-ID: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Last wednesday Emulatorman, hellekin and I met at HackLab Barracas[^1] and we talked about a propposal for receiving donations. To make this more dynamic, I proppose you express your concerns as patches to this document so we don't end up in endless discussions. And if you agree, just put a +1 :) TL;DR: The main idea is that we setup the needed infrastructure for receiving donations through the help of Ceata and aim to cover our current expenses (domain, server, etc.) for the next years. We can discuss and decide by consensus what use will the extra money have once we have it (more servers, buying hardware for porting, hacker remuneration, etc.). For this, we propose a two bucket approach: fill the current expenses bucket first, whose money goes to fund operations only, and then a second bucket for solidarity purposes, that's spent according to community consensual decisions once we have enough to cover operations comfortably. Since Ceata needs a person to talk to in behalf of Parabola, we propose that me (fauno) act as Parabola delegate for the first year. Several people have already agreed to this and even proposed it in the first place. After this period the delegation will rotate to another person. If the community is not happy with my work as delegate, we can rotate the delegation at any time. # Operations bucket * List on the wiki all the current expenses and donations we have --domain name, server(s), etc.-- with their respective costs if any. * Plan a budget for the next years to cover these costs and anything we're missing today --build server, arm hardware... # Solidarity bucket In the case that we receive more money than we need to cover operations, it'll go to a second bucket, over which we'll discuss and decide by community consensus in what way we want to spend or share it :) # Accountability Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be published on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. # Cryptocurrencies We can also create wallets in several cryptocurrencies to receive donations and make transactions directly. Just a thought :) # Relationship with Ceata If the offer made by Ceata is still up, fauno will act as a delegate of the Parabola community with them for the first year. The delegation tasks will be: * Drafting a contract with Ceata, describing our mutual relationship, responsibilities and obligations, and the mechanisms for receiving donations and making payments in behalf of us. Such draft will have to be aproved by the Parabola community, and negotiations will be transparently published on dev at lists.parabola.nu. * Be in communication with them and make sure decisions are made in a timely manner. After a year, we'll have to decide on another person to act as delegate. We can also decide before the year ends, so the current delegate can train the new one without exceeding his mandate (and burning out in the process!) If the community is not happy with the delegate's work, the delegate's mandate is immediately revoked and a new one must replace her/him. The important thing is that the donation infrastructure is setup and working soon enough! [^1]: http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar -- :D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hellekin at gnu.org Sat Feb 7 17:36:24 2015 From: hellekin at gnu.org (hellekin) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:36:24 -0300 Subject: [Dev] [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Replace section Accountability: On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > > # Accountability > > Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be published > on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket > discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. > > Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the > mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. > with: # Accountability A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate state of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income and expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular income and expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder of the finances. Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each bucket, and how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will be discussed and decided by community consensus and documented on the wiki. == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU1k0PXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9PScP/R4hXagIMeVTaPPzGvDORQol q5EKM6re0vTMCwm5iOmjLLXUmst2c6P7Q9ir6t8aj46AeA1w6PSjIiAk2rSk3y5a Tqm24OVXVwKVbN1/2LMQmnLe2ZtWlX6UYozmdCWf0Fcby6Mys9DkChddgvBk8/F4 mpbmpjD0x9bJo6vDJD3sY7rVTo1ah7wXU1ef1JVW/eUlXUI+WTOE4tIUAwKlrg3V tzbd861us0JaWwNiUofaent2UIgeFneN68mZlvrVOY46dJp9x6wqB76Smn1V4bPZ MIBwb/Jeff/CjjkHh3bAwlM/t+FO29unUpt82s+Y0s5QagyLhKns8hnP8Uj08Ick j+qaY53zDV7ep7ETKvsrxPM88tilDnLgUFzvbTCFj17ewsR8MVmnVTERVajSi5cJ 84j2UFJqcwFJqAiffRtYr5YC8BqTZQeXa41aQ9hM34fh40SPTgo54A3lVIDfDVQq exL+dgF36Dlh6yQEDJp9ZVebvV1clBWKZFPOBpaUzXi2boeCkrU5iF+z2V7Htbju F//9Gl6E3AxYwLIs5rUoVZIk7Tv+436XNyuQrRx1FYYlAR59w4zk9fzBeMycwIz/ x0O4hINJh0slSG4fDMTfBnvhVLkT7PGVEzKnDxxq4CrrW/6l3oRoMYiaAgZ7qBfn 6+w3qf3qRa5OgtY/8Be2 =eNPo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From emulatorman at riseup.net Sat Feb 7 18:23:57 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFNpbHZh?=) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:23:57 -0200 Subject: [Dev] [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> Message-ID: <54D6583D.5000307@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/07/2015 03:36 PM, hellekin wrote: > Replace section Accountability: > > On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > >> # Accountability > >> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be >> published on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity >> bucket discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. > >> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on >> the mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. > > > with: > > # Accountability > > A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate > state of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income > and expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular > income and expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder > of the finances. > > Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each > bucket, and how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will > be discussed and decided by community consensus and documented on > the wiki. > > == hk > +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU1lgyAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWks8P/j/XX2zUEHaxLO/cfIvbKK5X N1hZBy0zY476ok7UmZZsm4Kov7zR7kAz//qIsHXmNel5oOjObhiOvKDdLJS1qINS gpv30NFQ+D1DSxb0J3Wqyew7ACGV72D6fdnq1/CjW7IR7dtw1uuG6/E4FDW66oM5 w+XBS3mj2TSiPcnaUs4OvT8WsM0i9/GRV7xcFody+wfiSsBSNWDov0sOArsnY+4E nOYdKukqNmYuq7lp5hOi4863FXjqgkneq28bIMNwgpkdf825+jCTM7u6SlZ3rjxX ohhNFOi8p3rnupVgkXI3vtBw7M2HiMqJ+e4F2hyQdU6Wc6mSl0sYUVBI8158nNbE JSSKgwEup6un/sL9mSujo29disa2QYl/k/Cdk/8PbyPNTqN66HEvHeA7TwXsWVc0 DxBCzYFnNVrqemVfVC3MASvJ8TLKkhn3hmM70xc/uEXxlCba0rDsmB1oMYNu9PKG LDbx8G49nqs24IR1pXJoVRw854YeCQq7lAjeZEAsY5fAu6VSqYlty8UssqLp+GBG XWKhs/OEa5qEL/b+dyTP2L7aF+s+7pqCRKueXVCWSg5+JO0mcYCPkEx7XAlICRJz sRQmyj61Cr20Kr8ITxeHByKz2cC6tN0KtHnHbJEydBGDiZtI0U+NqKqtnx6TKcDM H7bPhHWWJJ6ApEnHQFgK =Aifr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From hahj87 at gmail.com Sat Feb 7 19:48:43 2015 From: hahj87 at gmail.com (Joshua Haase) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:48:43 -0600 Subject: [Dev] [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54D6583D.5000307@riseup.net> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <54D6583D.5000307@riseup.net> Message-ID: <87pp9ltsdg.fsf@gmail.com> +1 Andr? Silva writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/07/2015 03:36 PM, hellekin wrote: >> Replace section Accountability: >> >> On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >>> # Accountability >> >>> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be >>> published on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity >>> bucket discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. >> >>> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on >>> the mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. >> >> >> with: >> >> # Accountability >> >> A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate >> state of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income >> and expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular >> income and expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder >> of the finances. >> >> Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each >> bucket, and how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will >> be discussed and decided by community consensus and documented on >> the wiki. >> >> == hk >> > > +1 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU1lgyAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWks8P/j/XX2zUEHaxLO/cfIvbKK5X > N1hZBy0zY476ok7UmZZsm4Kov7zR7kAz//qIsHXmNel5oOjObhiOvKDdLJS1qINS > gpv30NFQ+D1DSxb0J3Wqyew7ACGV72D6fdnq1/CjW7IR7dtw1uuG6/E4FDW66oM5 > w+XBS3mj2TSiPcnaUs4OvT8WsM0i9/GRV7xcFody+wfiSsBSNWDov0sOArsnY+4E > nOYdKukqNmYuq7lp5hOi4863FXjqgkneq28bIMNwgpkdf825+jCTM7u6SlZ3rjxX > ohhNFOi8p3rnupVgkXI3vtBw7M2HiMqJ+e4F2hyQdU6Wc6mSl0sYUVBI8158nNbE > JSSKgwEup6un/sL9mSujo29disa2QYl/k/Cdk/8PbyPNTqN66HEvHeA7TwXsWVc0 > DxBCzYFnNVrqemVfVC3MASvJ8TLKkhn3hmM70xc/uEXxlCba0rDsmB1oMYNu9PKG > LDbx8G49nqs24IR1pXJoVRw854YeCQq7lAjeZEAsY5fAu6VSqYlty8UssqLp+GBG > XWKhs/OEa5qEL/b+dyTP2L7aF+s+7pqCRKueXVCWSg5+JO0mcYCPkEx7XAlICRJz > sRQmyj61Cr20Kr8ITxeHByKz2cC6tN0KtHnHbJEydBGDiZtI0U+NqKqtnx6TKcDM > H7bPhHWWJJ6ApEnHQFgK > =Aifr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev From coadde at riseup.net Sat Feb 7 20:25:08 2015 From: coadde at riseup.net (coadde) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 20:25:08 +0000 Subject: [Dev] [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> Message-ID: <54D674A4.10202@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 hellekin: > Replace section Accountability: > > On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > >> # Accountability > >> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be >> published on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity >> bucket discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. > >> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on >> the mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. > > > with: > > # Accountability > > A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate > state of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income > and expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular > income and expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder > of the finances. > > Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each > bucket, and how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will > be discussed and decided by community consensus and documented on > the wiki. > > == hk _______________________________________________ Dev mailing > list Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU1nSTAAoJEAr1J7uKIOikOtUP/2QKnV7Vh54zugOcRETg5Dmh TEEUTBX4RgtLlrmm4uClyyfNXpsetybIDnkWa5UlP9dVNdmiMoXvXmUFdKAtJCOp tkp9TG3rtbRP5EA8feCoqnI4Jh5yW7ggJ+br4yI5PnglARqAZXpnlL+BEfng1Sek sUgEk8+8MePeWmeUSLW29vpVVYoGSIa1eS1ACF5pPbTdI1/J1RTJ/bPUz3S0aAnX W5+TEkZUeIMBajgfl8UTLH/Uod6vGkAn3wtsXVDwaooNtCoSBZIjGt6K+K3r7WaJ guuGzvl3D6b57PRN+JPr9DcHYfCurnr5u6PGVZ683XDWygyexQRp/GO5xwxwFGyS A+UWqWJEj5oHtgEwVM5a4teHooj4SsXeBYopagTAx7XSAlozD5YZQNkdUSSlWqZ/ zflDkax2j7eibtc4xOcmJANlTTHfA0lvjOljSlWwzT8AoB/kfn84ura+el/e1CLr laJASZFT0/eCBkkBAxxNSskjQa7yKIPO49lyZFS0KRw1pFpNrKPFZUYl7+nMbmo+ 8MC0Za7iYtRun3c88Bg3heoJ7ls2jhP9lcBs9/nHYK9q/FD2ageQEeACubyE9grR g9eOQUo5J1teFVXcucQcuTjNMB0IyCo6bPmK5EubDjQEzl1wYFks0w/AbOyk7WHb 8QhYaAWhrZnuN1ncMRMF =Wkes -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From icarious at hacari.org Sun Feb 8 00:49:02 2015 From: icarious at hacari.org (Icarious) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:19:02 +0530 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <20150208061902.6be9f7c06936af654e647e38@hacari.org> > we have it (more servers, buying hardware for porting, hacker > remuneration, etc.). For this, we propose a two bucket approach: fill > the current expenses bucket first, whose money goes to fund operations > only, and then a second bucket for solidarity purposes, that's spent > according to community consensual decisions once we have enough to cover > operations comfortably. +1 > Since Ceata needs a person to talk to in behalf of Parabola, we propose > that me (fauno) act as Parabola delegate for the first year. Several > people have already agreed to this and even proposed it in the first > place. After this period the delegation will rotate to another person. > If the community is not happy with my work as delegate, we can rotate > the delegation at any time. +1 I have discussed about the possibility of a community consensus decided representative / delegate with Emulatorman. A yearly rotation and eligibility for a rerun of Delegate should be discussed by the community every year. My proposal for the upcoming Parabola delegate would be "Emulatorman". But he is already tasked with maintaining, fixing, updating many packages and his technical contributions to ensure user freedom has been priceless over the years. I'm freeing him off with "Delegation / Management duties" to let him do what he loves doing :). The second most favoured choice to me is "fauno". He has been there since the beginning of my time with Parabola and has been active regarding voicing opinions. I support "fauno" to take over the role as the first Parabola Delegate and wish him luck. P.S : I suggest an oath taking ceremony on #parabola by swearing on the GPL whenever a Delegated takes up the role :P. -- Icarious From alfplayer at mailoo.org Sun Feb 8 01:56:46 2015 From: alfplayer at mailoo.org (Esteban Carnevale) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 22:56:46 -0300 Subject: [Dev] alfplayer.com temporarily offline Message-ID: <20150207225646.0060eaf3252ed6f42e188c5b@mailoo.org> The mirror I maintain is offline for now. I'll try to recover it in some hours. Sorry. -- Esteban Carnevale From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Sun Feb 8 04:45:09 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 04:45:09 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [texlive-bin] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150208044509.845.57967@parabola.nu> elcorreo at deshackra.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * texlive-bin 2014.34260-5.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/texlive-bin/ * texlive-bin 2014.34260-5.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/texlive-bin/ The user provided the following additional text: $ pdflatex pdflatex: error while loading shared libraries: libpoppler.so.48: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Sun Feb 8 05:07:50 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 02:07:50 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [texlive-bin] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20150208044509.845.57967@parabola.nu> References: <20150208044509.845.57967@parabola.nu> Message-ID: <87oap59ejd.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Parabola Website Notification writes: > elcorreo at deshackra.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: > > > * texlive-bin 2014.34260-5.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/texlive-bin/ > * texlive-bin 2014.34260-5.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/texlive-bin/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > $ pdflatex > pdflatex: error while loading shared libraries: libpoppler.so.48: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory but we solved this already... -- http://utopia.partidopirata.com.ar/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Sun Feb 8 14:35:53 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 11:35:53 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87a90oa2t2.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > Last wednesday Emulatorman, hellekin and I met at HackLab Barracas[^1] > and we talked about a propposal for receiving donations. i forgot to add a due date for this propposal, i think tomorrow monday would be ok? -- http://endefensadelsl.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Sun Feb 8 14:47:03 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:47:03 -0200 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87a90oa2t2.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87a90oa2t2.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54D776E7.9050408@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/08/2015 12:35 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > >> Last wednesday Emulatorman, hellekin and I met at HackLab >> Barracas[^1] and we talked about a propposal for receiving >> donations. > > i forgot to add a due date for this propposal, i think tomorrow > monday would be ok? > perfect! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU13beAAoJEOaXR1L5cERW4EAQALP3fyw4YjlPup2ABFQ/Rk0n kwrtqV2N6KSqvSdWQz18Jv1chP8MwQY3qA61A6Os5fGAGOhCG8W2HZWyVBT26ygz muNAoRw/Nv4iB/KAqXaGuKANGk3WUbdb2YsARCukY/xVvMw9sf7i1cwSeiwh9c5D CPMw1NM2IWps95G0GDxwn+B0fnt6LAErcmKTXTZ6AYse3DK1iRolTjUNQg2MU+qX uziifCYl7zLJicSaRr2xsvS6PGbbQ6/PMWPjXxsW1YHnvfm2PW1tSJkb3IH456HE D354c1VB2yltYz7r/tGoT4r1P6/mO13rlID3PVrMriEygtoh1I4fDUqMkmrPPpkY wDug8HKz7fswHH9HffvTp9fYM7t/qQC6eyjAGMEEBUTRCwQSUvU62CrFLDKErMdJ 9Zr2EcvwOtN1HVID4jdf5Z+P3hcsOETFmb7xDQhn+PkOzXMEJZZANZbQAumOMA1x M5UJgJJKczi5MLq+1yDudc9p8IQ+bognhA5WlMoIztpNSSGLqxILYUmQmjwtNPwx Rrg1TMsx16GqcP9fmcc7u0ywsZtFV7qxcydZ0634XlSm7ISreSer65hZAg8fsNuz 3Tl2iOA41HxgblIaw/nG/zsqGiwI9j6iW9/TDqCECUdSB16S5CqsiiOfc8JDIpNJ rRZlHvvriSXLKJ9QgP2Q =Xb5Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mimex at fipasoft.com.mx Sat Feb 7 23:12:09 2015 From: mimex at fipasoft.com.mx (Miguel Trujillo) Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:12:09 -0600 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54D69BC9.8070404@fipasoft.com.mx> On 07/02/15 10:39, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > > Last wednesday Emulatorman, hellekin and I met at HackLab Barracas[^1] > and we talked about a propposal for receiving donations. > > To make this more dynamic, I proppose you express your concerns as > patches to this document so we don't end up in endless discussions. And > if you agree, just put a +1 :) > > > > TL;DR: The main idea is that we setup the needed infrastructure for > receiving donations through the help of Ceata and aim to cover our > current expenses (domain, server, etc.) for the next years. We can > discuss and decide by consensus what use will the extra money have once > we have it (more servers, buying hardware for porting, hacker > remuneration, etc.). For this, we propose a two bucket approach: fill > the current expenses bucket first, whose money goes to fund operations > only, and then a second bucket for solidarity purposes, that's spent > according to community consensual decisions once we have enough to cover > operations comfortably. > > Since Ceata needs a person to talk to in behalf of Parabola, we propose > that me (fauno) act as Parabola delegate for the first year. Several > people have already agreed to this and even proposed it in the first > place. After this period the delegation will rotate to another person. > If the community is not happy with my work as delegate, we can rotate > the delegation at any time. > > # Operations bucket > > * List on the wiki all the current expenses and donations we have > --domain name, server(s), etc.-- with their respective costs if any. > > * Plan a budget for the next years to cover these costs and anything > we're missing today --build server, arm hardware... > > # Solidarity bucket > > In the case that we receive more money than we need to cover operations, > it'll go to a second bucket, over which we'll discuss and decide by > community consensus in what way we want to spend or share it :) > > # Accountability > > Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be published on > the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket discussed and > agreed upon by the community beforehand. > > Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the > mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. > > # Cryptocurrencies > > We can also create wallets in several cryptocurrencies to receive > donations and make transactions directly. Just a thought :) > > # Relationship with Ceata > > If the offer made by Ceata is still up, fauno will act as a delegate of > the Parabola community with them for the first year. The delegation > tasks will be: > > * Drafting a contract with Ceata, describing our mutual relationship, > responsibilities and obligations, and the mechanisms for receiving > donations and making payments in behalf of us. Such draft will have > to be aproved by the Parabola community, and negotiations will be > transparently published on dev at lists.parabola.nu. > > * Be in communication with them and make sure decisions are made in a > timely manner. > > After a year, we'll have to decide on another person to act as delegate. > We can also decide before the year ends, so the current delegate can > train the new one without exceeding his mandate (and burning out in the > process!) > > If the community is not happy with the delegate's work, the delegate's > mandate is immediately revoked and a new one must replace her/him. > > The important thing is that the donation infrastructure is setup and > working soon enough! > > > > > > [^1]: http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > +1 -- Miguel Trujillo mimex at fipasoft.mx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Sun Feb 8 22:28:45 2015 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:28:45 +0100 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Nicol=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Reynolds"'s message of "Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:39:36 -0300") References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87pp9kt4v6.fsf@mtjm.eu> > Last wednesday Emulatorman, hellekin and I met at HackLab Barracas[^1] > and we talked about a propposal for receiving donations. > > To make this more dynamic, I proppose you express your concerns as > patches to this document so we don't end up in endless discussions. And > if you agree, just put a +1 :) +1 with hellekin's change. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alfplayer at mailoo.org Sun Feb 8 17:02:30 2015 From: alfplayer at mailoo.org (Esteban Carnevale) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 14:02:30 -0300 Subject: [Dev] alfplayer.com temporarily offline In-Reply-To: <20150207225646.0060eaf3252ed6f42e188c5b@mailoo.org> References: <20150207225646.0060eaf3252ed6f42e188c5b@mailoo.org> Message-ID: <20150208140230.73ba6b8f15c00ae59d4ef8b3@mailoo.org> It's back online with many more snapshots. The amount of snapshots will continue to grow. Now it's on a different US server (IP address is also different). -- Esteban Carnevale From encycl at a2c3.co Mon Feb 9 03:05:43 2015 From: encycl at a2c3.co (Charles Roth) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 19:05:43 -0800 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150208190543.7255edc8@a2c3.co> +1 Money is different than wealth. The project costs money. As was recently seen with my own situation, donors can have problems that affect the project. It's better if the project has its own funds to make sure essential services are always online. On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:05:05 +0000 dev-request at lists.parabola.nu wrote: > Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure -- Charles Roth, MPC Cultural Detective, Wistful Writer, Curious Antiquary, Noted Pedestrian, & Voracious Reader Primary email: encycl at parlementum.red GPG Key: http://keybase.io/encycl About Me: http://a2c3.co/encycl Protect your email: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ "La mort fromage--quel dommage!" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From tct at ceata.org Mon Feb 9 11:18:50 2015 From: tct at ceata.org (Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:18:50 +0200 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54D8979A.2000104@ceata.org> Hi, On 07.02.2015 18:39, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > If the offer made by Ceata is still up, fauno will act as a delegate of > the Parabola community with them for the first year. The offer was never off the table. Ceata is willing to collaborate with Parabola. Thanks, -- Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic Pre?edinte, Funda?ia Ceata +40-761-810-100 Sus?ii libertatea artelor ?i tehnologiilor? ?nscrie-te ca membru: http://ceata.org/%C3%AEnscrieri -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From niitotantei at riseup.net Mon Feb 9 11:36:43 2015 From: niitotantei at riseup.net (Daniel Milewski) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:36:43 +0100 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87pp9kt4v6.fsf@mtjm.eu> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87pp9kt4v6.fsf@mtjm.eu> Message-ID: <1423481803.1159.2.camel@riseup.net> > > Last wednesday Emulatorman, hellekin and I met at HackLab Barracas[^1] > > and we talked about a propposal for receiving donations. > > > > To make this more dynamic, I proppose you express your concerns as > > patches to this document so we don't end up in endless discussions. And > > if you agree, just put a +1 :) > > +1 with hellekin's change. +1 -- Daniel Milewski GPG key ID: 8D43A4A1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Mon Feb 9 21:20:58 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:20:58 -0300 Subject: [Dev] [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87twyu7pdx.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> hellekin writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Replace section Accountability: > > On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >> # Accountability >> >> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be published >> on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket >> discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. >> >> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the >> mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. >> > > with: > > # Accountability > > A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate state > of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income and > expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular income and > expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder of the finances. > > Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each bucket, and > how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will be discussed and > decided by community consensus and documented on the wiki. > > == > hk > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU1k0PXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 > ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9PScP/R4hXagIMeVTaPPzGvDORQol > q5EKM6re0vTMCwm5iOmjLLXUmst2c6P7Q9ir6t8aj46AeA1w6PSjIiAk2rSk3y5a > Tqm24OVXVwKVbN1/2LMQmnLe2ZtWlX6UYozmdCWf0Fcby6Mys9DkChddgvBk8/F4 > mpbmpjD0x9bJo6vDJD3sY7rVTo1ah7wXU1ef1JVW/eUlXUI+WTOE4tIUAwKlrg3V > tzbd861us0JaWwNiUofaent2UIgeFneN68mZlvrVOY46dJp9x6wqB76Smn1V4bPZ > MIBwb/Jeff/CjjkHh3bAwlM/t+FO29unUpt82s+Y0s5QagyLhKns8hnP8Uj08Ick > j+qaY53zDV7ep7ETKvsrxPM88tilDnLgUFzvbTCFj17ewsR8MVmnVTERVajSi5cJ > 84j2UFJqcwFJqAiffRtYr5YC8BqTZQeXa41aQ9hM34fh40SPTgo54A3lVIDfDVQq > exL+dgF36Dlh6yQEDJp9ZVebvV1clBWKZFPOBpaUzXi2boeCkrU5iF+z2V7Htbju > F//9Gl6E3AxYwLIs5rUoVZIk7Tv+436XNyuQrRx1FYYlAR59w4zk9fzBeMycwIz/ > x0O4hINJh0slSG4fDMTfBnvhVLkT7PGVEzKnDxxq4CrrW/6l3oRoMYiaAgZ7qBfn > 6+w3qf3qRa5OgtY/8Be2 > =eNPo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- http://utopia.partidopirata.com.ar/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Mon Feb 9 21:30:04 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:30:04 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Transparency (was: [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure) In-Reply-To: <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and ceata can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they can do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. hellekin writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Replace section Accountability: > > On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >> # Accountability >> >> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be published >> on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket >> discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. >> >> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the >> mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. >> > > with: > > # Accountability > > A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate state > of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income and > expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular income and > expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder of the finances. > > Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each bucket, and > how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will be discussed and > decided by community consensus and documented on the wiki. -- http://utopia.partidopirata.com.ar/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Mon Feb 9 22:54:03 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:54:03 -0200 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/09/2015 07:30 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > > ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P > > what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata > communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and > ceata can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our > communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they > can do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. > +1 Good idea! I agree because it provides a transparency communication for us and gives to the community a way to propose our ideas. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU2TqLAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWHq0QALOb+eG9ikEAAJET5/gw4OwY j6dd7aaoQVGtiT2XGwqMhAoZkVWF3U1mG8v1rYR1Ak6cQ7qCDh2chxHB/JE6KGS1 58tS5/WBRj4RRGChaaRaHUvcSn3mFTOTAkQUlT3fQH/IyZ6ecm3sljYkzEeygrWF UewAS//VFEJre5GXXeZpfF/A8lf+nk5h29EPJWvaIH4zgArDZ8npJlxcR1R46mII +bg9K/ivRZn0wzEB1r2zbpHnVhQZe34w9xZLKZjZlOqq9KeX0mKKOQPmLQH/fkWO FOJkz0JHSK7hsg7ifVKhnQYc8YVojdRcB+uaoZGs5HcJHncwr+p3ulK+9VQUq+9k jbgRJg79FSjmtLwGrFxPQzXFWdilEM0bDZ+Def1f+jwPEJpb5NnX8hISYZVYPkff fDk/WErDPY5lzuW/u85B9GHQpCPjtz+DWwXFTPTuRiyVjgdkmh+T+MYLuGXsuuob +qyZbcl/hyoMNuh00wDHGg+lJOqAq9CGePSlYBKri2jlg2sjFIdXSlCfzc9/SP23 NEKc96QF/IFSRmKGecbU9+QQyWkjiuS5FEbBGFk1aU4AudhnDzJRD6E260NecWAd U+DgzBPSMsRV4pm6j3SrnEsM5Z0e3t6gyXlaVSPuTd3lIiUBkRbayRvasXKDtsUP LtiHu/M5UM1ehpn6DlAV =Aw6t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ingegnue at riseup.net Tue Feb 10 05:46:27 2015 From: ingegnue at riseup.net (ingegnue) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:46:27 +0000 Subject: [Dev] KingOfTheJews is +q'ed on #parabola In-Reply-To: <87r3u2czgp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87r3u2czgp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: On February 6, 2015 7:55:18 PM EST, "Nicol?s Reynolds" wrote: > >i'm attaching the log that led to me setting +q mode to KingOfTheJews >as >per the irc policy[^1]. i've received some abuse in private too but i >don't mind. > > >[^1]: https://wiki.parabola.nu/IRC_Policy FWIW: Thank you. I don't come to #parabola to listen to that stuff, I come to talk tech and tech freedom. The behavior exhibited by "KingOfTheJews" in the attached log happens to be a quick way to alienate female participants; at least I would probably never come to that channel again, were that to be the norm. So, thanks! From ingegnue at riseup.net Tue Feb 10 05:58:28 2015 From: ingegnue at riseup.net (ingegnue) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:58:28 +0000 Subject: [Dev] [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> Message-ID: <5457AD60-7ABA-438F-B9D8-7ED2F4272B3B@riseup.net> +1 On February 7, 2015 12:36:24 PM EST, hellekin wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA512 > >Replace section Accountability: > >On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >> # Accountability >> >> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be published >> on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket >> discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. >> >> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the >> mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. >> > >with: > ># Accountability > >A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate state >of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income and >expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular income and >expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder of the finances. > >Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each bucket, >and >how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will be discussed >and >decided by community consensus and documented on the wiki. > >== >hk >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2 > >iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU1k0PXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w >ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 >ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9PScP/R4hXagIMeVTaPPzGvDORQol >q5EKM6re0vTMCwm5iOmjLLXUmst2c6P7Q9ir6t8aj46AeA1w6PSjIiAk2rSk3y5a >Tqm24OVXVwKVbN1/2LMQmnLe2ZtWlX6UYozmdCWf0Fcby6Mys9DkChddgvBk8/F4 >mpbmpjD0x9bJo6vDJD3sY7rVTo1ah7wXU1ef1JVW/eUlXUI+WTOE4tIUAwKlrg3V >tzbd861us0JaWwNiUofaent2UIgeFneN68mZlvrVOY46dJp9x6wqB76Smn1V4bPZ >MIBwb/Jeff/CjjkHh3bAwlM/t+FO29unUpt82s+Y0s5QagyLhKns8hnP8Uj08Ick >j+qaY53zDV7ep7ETKvsrxPM88tilDnLgUFzvbTCFj17ewsR8MVmnVTERVajSi5cJ >84j2UFJqcwFJqAiffRtYr5YC8BqTZQeXa41aQ9hM34fh40SPTgo54A3lVIDfDVQq >exL+dgF36Dlh6yQEDJp9ZVebvV1clBWKZFPOBpaUzXi2boeCkrU5iF+z2V7Htbju >F//9Gl6E3AxYwLIs5rUoVZIk7Tv+436XNyuQrRx1FYYlAR59w4zk9fzBeMycwIz/ >x0O4hINJh0slSG4fDMTfBnvhVLkT7PGVEzKnDxxq4CrrW/6l3oRoMYiaAgZ7qBfn >6+w3qf3qRa5OgtY/8Be2 >=eNPo >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >_______________________________________________ >Dev mailing list >Dev at lists.parabola.nu >https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev From ingegnue at riseup.net Tue Feb 10 05:59:21 2015 From: ingegnue at riseup.net (ingegnue) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:59:21 +0000 Subject: [Dev] Transparency (was: [PATCH] Re: Propposal for donations infrastructure) In-Reply-To: <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: +1 On February 9, 2015 4:30:04 PM EST, "Nicol?s Reynolds" wrote: > >ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P > >what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata >communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and ceata >can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our >communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they can >do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. > >hellekin writes: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> Replace section Accountability: >> >> On 02/07/2015 01:39 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >>> >>> # Accountability >>> >>> Any money going in and out of Parabola's buckets need to be >published >>> on the wiki, and any transactions from the solidarity bucket >>> discussed and agreed upon by the community beforehand. >>> >>> Also, every discussion about this needs to happen publicly on the >>> mailing list, and decisions documented on the wiki. >>> >> >> with: >> >> # Accountability >> >> A dedicated page on Parabola wiki will keep track of the accurate >state >> of Parabola's buckets at all times and detail public income and >> expenses. A mailing list will be used to announce irregular income >and >> expenses weekly if any, and receive a monthly reminder of the >finances. >> >> Accountability details on decision making, what goes in each bucket, >and >> how to handle and balance transparency and privacy will be discussed >and >> decided by community consensus and documented on the wiki. From hellekin at gnu.org Tue Feb 10 07:45:10 2015 From: hellekin at gnu.org (hellekin) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:45:10 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> Message-ID: <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/09/2015 07:54 PM, Andr? Silva wrote: > On 02/09/2015 07:30 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > >> ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P > >> what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata >> communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and >> ceata can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our >> communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they >> can do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. > > > +1 Good idea! I agree because it provides a transparency communication > for us and gives to the community a way to propose our ideas. > *** I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to promote "transparent communication", and I certainly don't think it's relevant to advancing the issue at this point. If the current proposal is accepted, fauno will be the delegate, and how this is handled is an implementation detail. Decision first, then implementation. If you insist on implementation, I'm for accountability, not transparency, and certainly not to "everyone". It's important *for the community* to be able to access tracking documents, but not for the public. It's important *for the community* to be able to access tracking documents *if necessary*, but having random people lurking and bikeshedding at every step is going to wear out the delegate quite fast. Accountability and TOFU. Privacy and freedom. Not transparency and the tyranny of structurelessness. The delegate should come to the community with: - - understanding of the need of CEATA - - a proposal to satisfy that need The community should provide the delegate with a clear response: - - yes, it's fine - - yes with patches - - no The delegate should go back to CEATA with: - - no, that need cannot be satisfied, but - - with such and such changes it would work, or - - yes, let's do it. This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque. The details of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to the process that is public otherwise. It's important to have a record of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many voices raised during a conversation. More importantly, it's a recipe for disaster. While you give attention to this, you're not working on your own tasks. The goal is to deliver a distro, not to micro-manage the delegate. My $0.02 == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU2bb+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9Nq0P/0aYOXFyb+pfWAgwQKwL4vJi 1kwUb5+gLTYU+B5u8CCcBeLSvVQsrfbSiBX5WszcIGp+CtXPY7oftdleFxE6OUzq eAnYGDoch+nayxEt0SE7PqMysaURfas3PYOeD/j89REIM5yRU6ptKBDB5STznmfD Prn1axO/KLF3X+zpr2khaxeXrvmr1GrENgDy6DM1s8Hdn5kdpNsZ2zVq3tTg03x0 gqA9hh1DGR8nhr0K+zbExx69MGVsHkHNBREvuXY5inc7RetkVk0Wq/jCH3kGKuvG Zqm3RGl7nxzSug/zY6fBhS2eIUIimIhcb4X+0wdbT+stFIZAvRbWkgftp3W0akvL IfXEU5r5qsdNfyDUbrkj0ZtolKlxJ0CgCB/6iCY5uwbsdAHF5gcES0fyd+ibwvAy ppnuqSAXAQA1HeHsvCmueGmHqKQ6CQL+EpEvtVLO3dM4mqbsQJkIAAVm72qvNxhc OYoQgRH4D7yG5Zc67ZI4EOOnmzHkMw5p3OlKpHcnWXP86o9vxyCIsLSfERVOpKhk qTZYKrN4r9JURw/V81pMkV+D8+tlN4jACB9cA3WNOvzBioyr1y77dRSXcFaEMQFC 5pQIyVD2XjffiX3JPk1viiU1Wjb/r9ytxAlu4zO+WsXz/mh/8AHK361Qy4/vP9BB e0wB9tWVceX5kjZdSK14 =n3Wf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Tue Feb 10 12:42:48 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:42:48 -0300 Subject: [Dev] KingOfTheJews is +q'ed on #parabola In-Reply-To: References: <87r3u2czgp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87d25i6ipj.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> ingegnue writes: > On February 6, 2015 7:55:18 PM EST, "Nicol?s Reynolds" wrote: >> >>i'm attaching the log that led to me setting +q mode to KingOfTheJews >>as per the irc policy[^1]. i've received some abuse in private too >>but i don't mind. >> >> >>[^1]: https://wiki.parabola.nu/IRC_Policy > FWIW: Thank you. I don't come to #parabola to listen to that stuff, I >come to talk tech and tech freedom. The behavior exhibited by >"KingOfTheJews" in the attached log happens to be a quick way to >alienate female participants; at least I would probably never come to >that channel again, were that to be the norm. So, thanks! we've never have a problem with off topic conversations, in fact it's because of that that #parabola is so awesome. but being an asshole and assuming everyone's ok with casual sexist conversation was never ok. it's happening more and more this days... other people also thanked me for silencing (+q) the guy. if you feel people is creating an unwelcoming climate on the irc channel please say so publicly. i know it may be difficult telling other people to fuck off but otherwise it passes as normality and it scalates for the worst. though i personally don't expect this kind of people suddenly realizing they're being assholes (in fact i was accused of abusing my "privilege" of silencing people while masturbating to it...) it seems sometimes you have to tell people it's not ok to take a shit on the floor :P -- }(:= -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Tue Feb 10 13:07:53 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:07:53 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87a90l7w46.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> hellekin writes: > This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque. The details > of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to > the process that is public otherwise. It's important to have a record > of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many voices > raised during a conversation. > that's why the propposed list was closed to posts. > More importantly, it's a recipe for disaster. While you give attention > to this, you're not working on your own tasks. The goal is to deliver a > distro, not to micro-manage the delegate. hahahaha -- http://endefensadelsl.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ingegnue at riseup.net Tue Feb 10 14:05:52 2015 From: ingegnue at riseup.net (ingegnue) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:05:52 +0000 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> Message-ID: On February 10, 2015 2:45:10 AM EST, hellekin wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA512 > >On 02/09/2015 07:54 PM, Andr? Silva wrote: >> On 02/09/2015 07:30 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >>> ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P >> >>> what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata >>> communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and >>> ceata can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our >>> communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they >>> can do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. >> >> >> +1 Good idea! I agree because it provides a transparency >communication >> for us and gives to the community a way to propose our ideas. >> >*** I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to promote "transparent >communication", and I certainly don't think it's relevant to advancing >the issue at this point. If the current proposal is accepted, fauno >will be the delegate, and how this is handled is an implementation >detail. Decision first, then implementation. > >If you insist on implementation, I'm for accountability, not >transparency, and certainly not to "everyone". It's important *for the >community* to be able to access tracking documents, but not for the >public. It's important *for the community* to be able to access >tracking documents *if necessary*, but having random people lurking and >bikeshedding at every step is going to wear out the delegate quite >fast. > Accountability and TOFU. Privacy and freedom. Not transparency and >the tyranny of structurelessness. > >The delegate should come to the community with: > >- - understanding of the need of CEATA >- - a proposal to satisfy that need > >The community should provide the delegate with a clear response: > >- - yes, it's fine >- - yes with patches >- - no > >The delegate should go back to CEATA with: > >- - no, that need cannot be satisfied, but >- - with such and such changes it would work, or >- - yes, let's do it. > >This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque. The details >of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to >the process that is public otherwise. It's important to have a record >of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many >voices >raised during a conversation. > >More importantly, it's a recipe for disaster. While you give attention >to this, you're not working on your own tasks. The goal is to deliver >a >distro, not to micro-manage the delegate. > >My $0.02 > >== >hk >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2 > >iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU2bb+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w >ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 >ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9Nq0P/0aYOXFyb+pfWAgwQKwL4vJi >1kwUb5+gLTYU+B5u8CCcBeLSvVQsrfbSiBX5WszcIGp+CtXPY7oftdleFxE6OUzq >eAnYGDoch+nayxEt0SE7PqMysaURfas3PYOeD/j89REIM5yRU6ptKBDB5STznmfD >Prn1axO/KLF3X+zpr2khaxeXrvmr1GrENgDy6DM1s8Hdn5kdpNsZ2zVq3tTg03x0 >gqA9hh1DGR8nhr0K+zbExx69MGVsHkHNBREvuXY5inc7RetkVk0Wq/jCH3kGKuvG >Zqm3RGl7nxzSug/zY6fBhS2eIUIimIhcb4X+0wdbT+stFIZAvRbWkgftp3W0akvL >IfXEU5r5qsdNfyDUbrkj0ZtolKlxJ0CgCB/6iCY5uwbsdAHF5gcES0fyd+ibwvAy >ppnuqSAXAQA1HeHsvCmueGmHqKQ6CQL+EpEvtVLO3dM4mqbsQJkIAAVm72qvNxhc >OYoQgRH4D7yG5Zc67ZI4EOOnmzHkMw5p3OlKpHcnWXP86o9vxyCIsLSfERVOpKhk >qTZYKrN4r9JURw/V81pMkV+D8+tlN4jACB9cA3WNOvzBioyr1y77dRSXcFaEMQFC >5pQIyVD2XjffiX3JPk1viiU1Wjb/r9ytxAlu4zO+WsXz/mh/8AHK361Qy4/vP9BB >e0wB9tWVceX5kjZdSK14 >=n3Wf >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >_______________________________________________ >Dev mailing list >Dev at lists.parabola.nu >https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev +1 Hmm, yes, good point.. From ingegnue at riseup.net Tue Feb 10 14:11:43 2015 From: ingegnue at riseup.net (ingegnue) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:11:43 +0000 Subject: [Dev] KingOfTheJews is +q'ed on #parabola In-Reply-To: <87d25i6ipj.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87r3u2czgp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87d25i6ipj.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <1B5456B4-23CE-4A86-B624-1832441518F9@riseup.net> On February 10, 2015 7:42:48 AM EST, "Nicol?s Reynolds" wrote: >ingegnue writes: > >> On February 6, 2015 7:55:18 PM EST, "Nicol?s Reynolds" > wrote: >>> >>>i'm attaching the log that led to me setting +q mode to KingOfTheJews >>>as per the irc policy[^1]. i've received some abuse in private too >>>but i don't mind. >>> >>> >>>[^1]: https://wiki.parabola.nu/IRC_Policy >> FWIW: Thank you. I don't come to #parabola to listen to that stuff, >I >>come to talk tech and tech freedom. The behavior exhibited by >>"KingOfTheJews" in the attached log happens to be a quick way to >>alienate female participants; at least I would probably never come to >>that channel again, were that to be the norm. So, thanks! > >we've never have a problem with off topic conversations, in fact it's >because of that that #parabola is so awesome. but being an asshole and >assuming everyone's ok with casual sexist conversation was never ok. >it's happening more and more this days... > >other people also thanked me for silencing (+q) the guy. if you feel >people is creating an unwelcoming climate on the irc channel please say >so publicly. i know it may be difficult telling other people to fuck >off >but otherwise it passes as normality and it scalates for the worst. > >though i personally don't expect this kind of people suddenly realizing >they're being assholes (in fact i was accused of abusing my "privilege" >of silencing people while masturbating to it...) > >it seems sometimes you have to tell people it's not ok to take a shit >on >the floor :P +1 OK! That is good to hear -- and I agree. Once again, thanks! From hellekin at gnu.org Tue Feb 10 14:58:25 2015 From: hellekin at gnu.org (hellekin) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:58:25 -0300 Subject: [Dev] KingOfTheJews is +q'ed on #parabola In-Reply-To: <87d25i6ipj.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87r3u2czgp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87d25i6ipj.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54DA1C91.9050306@gnu.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/10/2015 09:42 AM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > > it seems sometimes you have to tell people it's not ok to take a shit on > the floor :P > *** Depends on the context. According to Hakim Bey, it's poetic terrorism to do so in the middle of a bank. ;oP == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU2hyKXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9eMIP/2tr37n7lCvQrP5kxBUWNlS5 J7lg5h5BbV3oIbAvegnBC9PEYpWY9J+eQyLttx+tvS0Yr97mBBa/xFJTgU9TwPsU 6N6CnCCAw4UqsxLLBtL5qKgxmVS4NVYB9K6H4v3CAz8nxyB51+x4Fcnl4N3/BJRJ dBfm6aTY7CZIppgdrX8OI3t/okDDe2oSJ4hj187ZlykEG2k6uUG86yTCRTi26MsT 5FNZVuLNF54Fg/IJZkZxbS1+qUfoSZhvdpKwCGtkwpeenZ2Yh/XV2ExI0fVCKUw/ a+GXfQX2vl+Ne2tjeNtOx+xydy2Ml7Z0abZM53+ilonFd2UMgEXg1+KoMon/2N/1 nFAf/HGBx4t4q7DHLmvtgJDWQvvuOe8JeMMCicYB4jSvAV3gaOZbYd0rc3RQ9oZf XU+Pe80WXhrw6Z5UrhZ6n9qVBl155AWvuNXGz7Jiw0Kkr5Ri398rFLbK7l7oNQVK gs8b5JFlrSQB3iRRTXoDrNpl+M0g75RMp0HsxzaBFNF5jjDOQ9EumxjYFRs5OauL Q0Grt7/1IUYor3RlF4V5HqioJ2weGmQsrwkF6W7l7Pg0b4MvsHuNbdcp8mEhIO7z N9Sg2/PAQ+b+XJ+KXfBrKJauSEYkUxg8scOSZX89VCQqM1RZo5WD2OnR083PXp9Q OkPJ16H/A4nZyR/3ftHd =iEiC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From emulatorman at riseup.net Tue Feb 10 19:27:38 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:27:38 -0200 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> Message-ID: <54DA5BAA.7010905@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/10/2015 05:45 AM, hellekin wrote: > If you insist on implementation, I'm for accountability, not > transparency, and certainly not to "everyone". It's important *for > the community* to be able to access tracking documents, but not for > the public. It's important *for the community* to be able to > access tracking documents *if necessary*, but having random people > lurking and bikeshedding at every step is going to wear out the > delegate quite fast. Accountability and TOFU. Privacy and freedom. > Not transparency and the tyranny of structurelessness. > Yes, you're right, i didn't paid attention on that detail, also fauno gave to me the book called "the tyranny of structurelessness" by Jo Freeman [0] that explains about it. Thanks! [0]:http://jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU2luiAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWnp0QAKVPYrZrwmGu21RpuR49OCE6 /4Enmjzdd83Vqei687FsRVsyPkTyjnGq0W8UUSlpbHHDZnFFGLFXZh5ydFR3Tb3d SWmr3OMaK/reVLkqJUBBzXSfeQ6LsKKpvR+RWkoVAOtyRsgISW2ddK/1Ps9CZMHW 6lvx2amd4a1SA9DveyEokG+PU2SNIRIuVbEglOGGNjd0Tj1U8qikSjvpPzSk4RyZ xmlOiDkSTgk/p7+4YaLiBSc6zfvH6tSrkd75W86SnbR2mIe4/7psWDlpvJBzH5S+ W8RtcHORpgu9xCHCQYvhObI8flQXihSyKyvgezKY4hiE87hrSFCynGbADzRCblVK TFc5k9XsYz8NjnhgiHzfKJXDHbIg//2Uvu5J7mR68PhD/FUUZ57J6bA+86hQ4gNa lZDgeTU+P+DPhRmmsNyJzV7gQ9Rnuv3UiT+CSdVI1hnY6bUYMtbvXQhCGLBbkS4j q8C0A9a3mekGvtztErAffqj1mBYk08dJT7wxDbBpyHQbL2jArdfRm2bQt+d9iqff xlY1/yvnN3gf92GiK4d7gN/jkT1ew3//LcD+J4TR8bP294Z6jfsK6Lr0X3zydTQ5 Mk3nkeiPfMyalE39Nx5ak3ZNPrymOQ5rkbCPsj2e5qTYZaYWTn3qGN65Mi8V6Bjy fmZwGrJgOLo96HLhwKQS =Gic5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Thu Feb 12 14:16:09 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:09 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Extra package [xorg-server] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150212141609.696.17769@parabola.nu> bugmenot at bugmenot.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * xorg-server 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server/ * xorg-server 1.16.4-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/xorg-server/ * xorg-server 1.15.0-5 [libre] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/mips64el/xorg-server/ * xorg-server 1.16.4-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/xorg-server/ * xorg-server-common 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-common/ * xorg-server-devel 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-devel/ * xorg-server-xdmx 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xdmx/ * xorg-server-xephyr 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xephyr/ * xorg-server-xnest 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xnest/ * xorg-server-xvfb 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xvfb/ The user provided the following additional text: upstream at 1.17, also flagged there... From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Fri Feb 13 14:46:46 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:46:46 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54D8979A.2000104@ceata.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D8979A.2000104@ceata.org> Message-ID: <87sie9j2cp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes: > Hi, > > On 07.02.2015 18:39, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> If the offer made by Ceata is still up, fauno will act as a delegate of >> the Parabola community with them for the first year. > > The offer was never off the table. Ceata is willing to collaborate with > Parabola. hey, i pinged you a week ago :) -- http://partidopirata.com.ar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tct at ceata.org Fri Feb 13 15:41:26 2015 From: tct at ceata.org (Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:41:26 +0200 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <87sie9j2cp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D8979A.2000104@ceata.org> <87sie9j2cp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54DE1B26.4070902@ceata.org> On 13.02.2015 16:46, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes: >> > On 07.02.2015 18:39, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >>> >> If the offer made by Ceata is still up, fauno will act as a delegate of >>> >> the Parabola community with them for the first year. >> > >> > The offer was never off the table. Ceata is willing to collaborate with >> > Parabola. > hey, i pinged you a week ago :) Hi, I have received an e-mail from you on Tuesday 10.02.2015 at 15:13 and a ping today the minute you wrote here, on the mailing list. Anyway, that's three days, not a week. And I am sorry, I haven't been able to respond to you with anything helpful before I delivered my presentation part of this workshop on decentralized networks Ceata has organized yesterday evening: https://ceata.org/evenimente/retele-de-socializare-descentralizate.html Please allow me this weekend to formulate a response to your request for a collaboration draft. Thanks, -- Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic Pre?edinte, Funda?ia Ceata +40-761-810-100 Sus?ii libertatea artelor ?i tehnologiilor? ?nscrie-te ca membru: http://ceata.org/%C3%AEnscrieri -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Fri Feb 13 16:50:38 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:50:38 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Propposal for donations infrastructure In-Reply-To: <54DE1B26.4070902@ceata.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D8979A.2000104@ceata.org> <87sie9j2cp.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54DE1B26.4070902@ceata.org> Message-ID: <87bnkxiwm9.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes: > On 13.02.2015 16:46, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes: >>> > On 07.02.2015 18:39, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >>>> >> If the offer made by Ceata is still up, fauno will act as a delegate of >>>> >> the Parabola community with them for the first year. >>> > >>> > The offer was never off the table. Ceata is willing to collaborate with >>> > Parabola. > >> hey, i pinged you a week ago :) > > Hi, I have received an e-mail from you on Tuesday 10.02.2015 at 15:13 > and a ping today the minute you wrote here, on the mailing list. Anyway, > that's three days, not a week. hahaha i misread the date, sorry > And I am sorry, I haven't been able to respond to you with anything > helpful before I delivered my presentation part of this workshop on > decentralized networks Ceata has organized yesterday evening: > > https://ceata.org/evenimente/retele-de-socializare-descentralizate.html > congrats! > Please allow me this weekend to formulate a response to your request for > a collaboration draft. ok, ping me over email, irc or jabber when you do :) -- http://partidopirata.com.ar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Tue Feb 17 02:11:06 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:11:06 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Kernels package [linux-libre-rt] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150217021106.403.71726@parabola.nu> biserangeloff at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.18/ (at last) From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Tue Feb 17 15:44:47 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:44:47 -0300 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed Message-ID: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> for: * openswan * networkmanager-openswan * galera * mariadb-galera -- http://partidopirata.com.ar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Tue Feb 17 19:04:44 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:04:44 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Fwd: [GNU-linux-libre] Doxygen: recommendation of nonfree browsers for SVG Message-ID: <87egpos6k3.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> -- D -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:07:55 +0200 From: fr33domlover To: gnu-linux-libre at nongnu.org Organization: Earth Subject: [GNU-linux-libre] Doxygen: recommendation of nonfree browsers for SVG -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------------- End of forwarded message -------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Tue Feb 17 21:29:23 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:29:23 -0200 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed In-Reply-To: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54E3B2B3.9010401@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/17/2015 01:44 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > > for: > > * openswan * networkmanager-openswan * galera * mariadb-galera > No problem, i will do it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU47KsAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWdRAP/2haQ5eLxH+0FKdfoYDHiPfE xhSnt38r0/AiFeqKOXKuJj8sKxGSnlO4LPYZU+yG3YGM25tDeIC88EyCPFJ00rm+ HdRzLBpDYpS1qeiMOEtbRjhOhQlbVuOoIReNbw2lyQ3q80ho7hQQ4ZSK6HbCMtCL mOv8nSnGpmdKMeQX+JY29BU/6kUoqqgtlzLZpnx+GnNNbgtqg8C62xZpoCOnjp1g xirI6mfpceFTQZ4ObyB7XnQx1j4syq7r01hdnKqjDnOk9MgQgtxRlykTvvBt60fQ ngz6HG+/6or5KpcPKh2VJZNKqkuWlezxb55o84b/rWnzYK6KLCcJILtQZ4Zf5iss zmpJGRXJ4qH6TqhMyLrMdbrExrMA3c6qQTROa0rgN4B33Sfhtg0qbpOfVxWx1I3f Q4dRfAd79LZnjS2yE6M33kNhgZcuY8g/uGOPLzlH5NWi8sCmG2ZDP7Ym9eF4dSh5 m99I0js+vzk5B5ZfjnK+Ctw1wNXUYlMskwJy+c2ZjmeLJ4not86BFdwTSZuEWwn9 BEkT4r3V2gx4BKq8G1tkm1CWaPpPxNl1ifAmiS2Kv7qjzYRdNDI6VRTsOPYVuzmB w962NmnQn0LmXNWs+f6OBadKcW/J1ERFy+19ZOlcnalzFuL2Bh5YHhynnw0LrW5g 6jNcGlZv9CTjC7atlgBH =noth -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From emulatorman at riseup.net Wed Feb 18 03:03:12 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:03:12 -0200 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed In-Reply-To: <54E3B2B3.9010401@riseup.net> References: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54E3B2B3.9010401@riseup.net> Message-ID: <54E400F0.1090501@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/17/2015 07:29 PM, Andr? Silva wrote: > On 02/17/2015 01:44 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > >> for: > >> * openswan * networkmanager-openswan * galera * mariadb-galera > > > No problem, i will do it > all packages were pushed! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU5ADqAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWvMYP/2fDh7lDCg9wRQXDDlEytXn5 T4+y9cCcq5C8n6KPgvY8fYV/ezzsJewz0S+RifUmKs1vuh8R47RPOCV9bAevnUTz mvSQKwmNClkE8u926EQPlzXFwem/800xLJC4QMH4GA5IVN7PrECC8GLc3z9HkF6h F2RpIhDREi5QB6uoatj6kEMFmHDgKlzKol85tWUKoaxIavCSaxFmBFFfeS01Mnlt x1FdMcHKY/FN6mu0ETvPm1d5d8w7DeM1UgAccgHNkQ9aGvdbxDFEBrwNpQUlZmkW DOkt+w7tVJONBVWic9SS+QAgt3mxCU3iHAthc9q6vV306cau76TvB8vyEf8+ATyB 2WpzUM4YJ9WCfAi9m7xMjZT8lMdHFRgOXioAJFT5sEO1mkas4dzzBqgBmb9Y0cXx MPM/Bpzgmw96xJcrGDSkLhkuU3FIM5D+UKnVYxBuArk4Sb40AiyAqRjOETlUi0T3 4VHhHvSgKdzXNoeU09h5Pj0AgJqbkXAQODeoKdHN8qdKTDB2S/RRktRx1Fw8/SDq 94+lZwY4ZByXK1PLw5vmRHbWYTzERd/oyBfxz9VcvI9dLul8H8FZGPosZHVI69Qk iyaJXPbWNvSnvMqMnUsfwecZX4zRKkA0MSpWACo7vfWG7u2yjSGmhhPZc3Sjbd87 YUhtQXTlh4bn1UBjDFlS =beuI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Wed Feb 18 17:58:32 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:58:32 -0300 Subject: [Dev] current expenses Message-ID: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> what are our current expenses? alfplayer tells me the parabola.nu domain costed $32usd for 2 years last time. a .org domain is $11usd/y according to name.com, so we have $27usd/y in domain names. is that correct? we're currently not paying anything for our current server, but i'm checking our current data transfer usage to see how much would be have to if we need to. is there anything else i'm forgetting about? if we were to buy some beaglebones for the arm port, how much would they cost? what would be the requirements for a build machine? can we build one an host it at home or somewhere else? i have unlimited data transfer at 1mb/s, for instance, but no extra machine, and the power service is cheap but very unreliable these days. -- :> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From aurelien at hackers.camp Wed Feb 18 18:03:43 2015 From: aurelien at hackers.camp (=?utf-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_DESBRI=C3=88RES?=) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:03:43 +0100 Subject: [Dev] current expenses In-Reply-To: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Nicol=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Reynolds"'s message of "Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:58:32 -0300") References: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87pp97hzb4.fsf@unicorn.home> Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > what are our current expenses? alfplayer tells me the parabola.nu > domain costed $32usd for 2 years last time. a .org domain is $11usd/y > according to name.com, so we have $27usd/y in domain names. > > is that correct? > > we're currently not paying anything for our current server, but i'm > checking our current data transfer usage to see how much would be have > to if we need to. > > is there anything else i'm forgetting about? > > if we were to buy some beaglebones for the arm port, how much would they > cost? http://beagleboard.org/ give link to different shop depending of country. I already own one but, we should maybe stand a bit because a new version should certainly get out soon. > what would be the requirements for a build machine? can we build one an > host it at home or somewhere else? i have unlimited data transfer at > 1mb/s, for instance, but no extra machine, and the power service is > cheap but very unreliable these days. -- Aurelien Desbrieres http://www.hackers.camp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Wed Feb 18 19:17:43 2015 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:17:43 +0100 Subject: [Dev] current expenses In-Reply-To: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Nicol=C3=A1?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Reynolds"'s message of "Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:58:32 -0300") References: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87y4nvghbc.fsf@mtjm.eu> > if we were to buy some beaglebones for the arm port, how much would they > cost? Converting a price from a Polish shop: 65 USD. Converting a price from a random site that looks like a Brazilian shop: 135 USD. Ask who would buy them and from where. > what would be the requirements for a build machine? An i.MX6 or Tegra SoC, many cores, much RAM, big and fast storage, some reliable network. This should be a Parabola ARM target. (Offtopic: I can buy several Wandboard Quads for the price of a Novena board.) > can we build one an > host it at home or somewhere else? Measure how much bandwidth we need for updated packages + their sources + build logs. > i have unlimited data transfer at > 1mb/s, for instance, but no extra machine, and the power service is > cheap but very unreliable these days. Add the price of a sufficient UPS, check if that bandwidth is sufficient. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: From korobkov at fryxell.info Fri Feb 20 10:06:05 2015 From: korobkov at fryxell.info (Andrey Korobkov) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:06:05 +0300 Subject: [Dev] [texlive-bin] Missing biber. Something wrong with it? Message-ID: Hello, I see libre version of texlive-bin doesn't include very useful and needed bibliography sofwtare component - biber (http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/). Is anything wrong with it? -- Andrey Korobkov -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 213 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtjm at mtjm.eu Fri Feb 20 18:53:39 2015 From: mtjm at mtjm.eu (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Mas=C5=82owski?=) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:53:39 +0100 Subject: [Dev] [texlive-bin] Missing biber. Something wrong with it? In-Reply-To: (Andrey Korobkov's message of "Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:06:05 +0300") References: Message-ID: <87h9ugv2h8.fsf@mtjm.eu> > I see libre version of texlive-bin doesn't include very useful and > needed bibliography sofwtare component - biber > (http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/). Is anything wrong with it? The Arch package doesn't build it from source, so we remove it: https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/87. No one was sufficiently interested to build it from source. (It's a Perl program, it should be easy to package.) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lukeshu at sbcglobal.net Fri Feb 20 20:08:09 2015 From: lukeshu at sbcglobal.net (Luke Shumaker) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Dev] current expenses In-Reply-To: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87vbiwxs5y.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> At Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:58:32 -0300, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > what are our current expenses? alfplayer tells me the parabola.nu > domain costed $32usd for 2 years last time. parabola.nu is $32USD for a year, not 2 years. Source: I paid it in January this year, and it expires January 2016. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Fri Feb 20 20:30:17 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:30:17 -0300 Subject: [Dev] current expenses In-Reply-To: <87vbiwxs5y.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> References: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87vbiwxs5y.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> Message-ID: <87d254z5pi.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Luke Shumaker writes: > At Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:58:32 -0300, > Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> what are our current expenses? alfplayer tells me the parabola.nu >> domain costed $32usd for 2 years last time. > > parabola.nu is $32USD for a year, not 2 years. next time we'll get parabola.in :P parabola.sl would be cool, because of software libre, but they're even more expensive :c > > Source: I paid it in January this year, and it expires January 2016. i think the first donations should be used to reimburse you and encyclomundi :) -- http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Fri Feb 20 20:44:29 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:44:29 -0200 Subject: [Dev] [texlive-bin] Missing biber. Something wrong with it? In-Reply-To: <87h9ugv2h8.fsf@mtjm.eu> References: <87h9ugv2h8.fsf@mtjm.eu> Message-ID: <54E79CAD.9050301@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/20/2015 04:53 PM, Micha? Mas?owski wrote: >> I see libre version of texlive-bin doesn't include very useful >> and needed bibliography sofwtare component - biber >> (http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/). Is anything wrong with >> it? > > The Arch package doesn't build it from source, so we remove it: > https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/87. No one was sufficiently > interested to build it from source. (It's a Perl program, it > should be easy to package.) > Maybe we could build biblatex-biber based from AUR [0] and add it as depends to texlive-bin though [0]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/biblatex-biber/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU55ymAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWppIP/RdtbPbhfa8iUboLPEteoXDf AmVr7uiQ9WGqNKh8NpbF4w+pASMwOf9KxMmpSMh0sMwJcF12npo4Ikx1ta5RkvEN 2MtKuVBuSWFfwpPo0eh/e6RlJ0ISoicSV2oS3Rlm0Cg2UXP79SZHV6/h+gCWSMMs 9nLfiLp5/4Q9zItjncOISCspfWt8hir8XNPmSKAmD7oZTaFwgIgePcKBXyI8wKva 0CA+Q9V+oF9QPML8cPXEvYwiYXYQSe1cGEpmlCtwnw+aelmpGnfMR20mXngwjDQm WYLFCYD5SNqoruXv8ItBj6BXZzq/OD8TR1DXr8/9OjXqwnBRDG1Z3T7HuOMAULDY BQPo8+TKd6pN45Okc9r3i1YipnHZQCedsnzeXEqpC/+vvF3ePifkXoRQMVVQ5Rkg 1p8L5/+D/DD4a5FgOObJOQzN3HV3jW/sUmHnq0qpEt5nhcD8DCtLaKhBvG3LMdRp XT6QwusKNI7YG67IWVToye0k7AgZQbGprH/W9MaiVy2Of6rpn86BSjPtx5dpk1Kl llNNo+8kFpScMMptwS6VWEGJPCS7l84GoDTtx7fWOIPp8DHbs8JUs3WL8syAlj7j 7jy5tiCblu5ZiVxk10i5qALPQvVqx4oA90J1PLRfNAgPqskkrF97UOMaCz9KL/FY u0ttspZRRuAJ3oWhYNso =REgT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From lukeshu at sbcglobal.net Fri Feb 20 20:47:29 2015 From: lukeshu at sbcglobal.net (Luke Shumaker) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Extra package [xorg-server] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20150212141609.696.17769@parabola.nu> References: <20150212141609.696.17769@parabola.nu> Message-ID: <87twygxqce.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> At Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:09 -0000, Parabola Website Notification wrote: > > bugmenot at bugmenot.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: > > > * xorg-server 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server/ > * xorg-server 1.16.4-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/xorg-server/ > * xorg-server 1.15.0-5 [libre] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/mips64el/xorg-server/ > * xorg-server 1.16.4-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/xorg-server/ > * xorg-server-common 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-common/ > * xorg-server-devel 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-devel/ > * xorg-server-xdmx 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xdmx/ > * xorg-server-xephyr 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xephyr/ > * xorg-server-xnest 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xnest/ > * xorg-server-xvfb 1.14.3-1 [extra] (mips64el): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/extra/mips64el/xorg-server-xvfb/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > upstream at 1.17, also flagged there... x86_64 and i686 are updated. A reminder to everyone: mips64el Parabola is no longer actively developed. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From lukeshu at sbcglobal.net Fri Feb 20 21:00:31 2015 From: lukeshu at sbcglobal.net (Luke Shumaker) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <87a90l7w46.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> <87a90l7w46.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87sie0xpqo.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> Hi guys, Sorry I'm about a week late on this... I'm proving to be increasingly terrible at time management and juggling my commitments. I suck. Anyway, I support the proposal up to this point in the thread At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:07:53 -0300, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > hellekin writes: > > This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque. The details > > of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to > > the process that is public otherwise. It's important to have a record > > of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many voices > > raised during a conversation. > > that's why the propposed list was closed to posts. I support the publicly-read-only list, but believe that ultimately that detail should be up to the delegate. Obviosly, fauno currently supports the list. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Fri Feb 20 21:28:53 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:28:53 -0300 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed In-Reply-To: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <874mqgz2zu.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > for: > > * openswan > * networkmanager-openswan > * galera > * mariadb-galera also: * knot * libshout-idjc * idjc * gnupg1 -- http://utopia.partidopirata.com.ar/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ingegnue at riseup.net Fri Feb 20 21:46:15 2015 From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Dev] current expenses In-Reply-To: <87d254z5pi.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87wq3f3xvb.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87vbiwxs5y.wl-lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> <87d254z5pi.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54E7AB27.5070007@riseup.net> FWIW I recently bought an .xyz domain (for my personal site) off of GANDI for $5 USD. Not sure if the price has increased, but might be worth considering. On 02/20/2015 03:30 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > Luke Shumaker writes: > >> At Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:58:32 -0300, >> Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >>> what are our current expenses? alfplayer tells me the parabola.nu >>> domain costed $32usd for 2 years last time. >> >> parabola.nu is $32USD for a year, not 2 years. > > next time we'll get parabola.in :P > > parabola.sl would be cool, because of software libre, but they're even > more expensive :c > >> >> Source: I paid it in January this year, and it expires January 2016. > > i think the first donations should be used to reimburse you and > encyclomundi :) > > -- > http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > From emulatorman at riseup.net Sat Feb 21 00:37:02 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:37:02 -0200 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed In-Reply-To: <874mqgz2zu.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <874mqgz2zu.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54E7D32E.2090102@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/20/2015 07:28 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > >> for: >> >> * openswan * networkmanager-openswan * galera * mariadb-galera > > also: > > * knot * libshout-idjc * idjc * gnupg1 > pushed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU59MuAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWbfEP/1szI/qSXo1rZ/8S4YoRIXqZ ORD1ujw5w+JKgcPmiIAhbcTPWvqO8M37VScAHyj3279GQvvUTnVuX7QD6t+CzFSs 2QQ34eqmZh1RVNpFU0pZqUiNH1EZNLERkzbXgFW3Uy9Sq7mtkYMAsjeG28v5Ld27 7U13Lu+QuiXBvE3cvAKAIYK/dP5YSBE6hz9tMoQ7nk1rdt5T57yLJGZDHnzhCoew rwENBLnAS6Z36uxnRbo8KakV0l3YQrqlDoKER0QOooRefFScb1jKAUUwCXwsGPQ5 n0UXeuwnZ09Gq/u2we4orGeuCc1qmEPgWYAk0PP0UrFebSCS/XEVYGTibHvTXm0k AAeUg1fvFwk7wOChNQQS+UAWKrnnWcBPQbt1UU5Vs7I8E6hFYt3Q0KgdPooC2Vjt 3fiEfxHlgtCtVc+vu3ki4PQxzzBWmPKH3nBYK6eCffyzgxCQrZKOyz/23kWaZDEn JiyMtx/Md2B1khGNNj7RVc/99dSiNqdCPjuQjvXSsm4X34ZaVqMAlmagzBg9sW5s +4TS4afeN8LuxrcweUAXH0oPDtweXNZZ6CcF02Kym0S1KcQ2eRm80N9kUjNh/Oqn TeZPAoWHsqro+qSuBNLPBRh69WjgDcxNiTVpVlDf9tcQ7DgwldcITH+bH8MhM+2r LZIO5D/qeDtNiVkFjQM2 =R5lj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From elcorreo at deshackra.com Sat Feb 21 02:27:05 2015 From: elcorreo at deshackra.com (Jorge Araya Navarro) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:27:05 -0600 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> Message-ID: <87r3tkhudi.fsf@abril.charola> Andr? Silva writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/09/2015 07:30 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >> ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P >> >> what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata >> communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and >> ceata can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our >> communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they >> can do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. >> YES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6P40wLThbc > > +1 Good idea! I agree because it provides a transparency communication > for us and gives to the community a way to propose our ideas. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU2TqLAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWHq0QALOb+eG9ikEAAJET5/gw4OwY > j6dd7aaoQVGtiT2XGwqMhAoZkVWF3U1mG8v1rYR1Ak6cQ7qCDh2chxHB/JE6KGS1 > 58tS5/WBRj4RRGChaaRaHUvcSn3mFTOTAkQUlT3fQH/IyZ6ecm3sljYkzEeygrWF > UewAS//VFEJre5GXXeZpfF/A8lf+nk5h29EPJWvaIH4zgArDZ8npJlxcR1R46mII > +bg9K/ivRZn0wzEB1r2zbpHnVhQZe34w9xZLKZjZlOqq9KeX0mKKOQPmLQH/fkWO > FOJkz0JHSK7hsg7ifVKhnQYc8YVojdRcB+uaoZGs5HcJHncwr+p3ulK+9VQUq+9k > jbgRJg79FSjmtLwGrFxPQzXFWdilEM0bDZ+Def1f+jwPEJpb5NnX8hISYZVYPkff > fDk/WErDPY5lzuW/u85B9GHQpCPjtz+DWwXFTPTuRiyVjgdkmh+T+MYLuGXsuuob > +qyZbcl/hyoMNuh00wDHGg+lJOqAq9CGePSlYBKri2jlg2sjFIdXSlCfzc9/SP23 > NEKc96QF/IFSRmKGecbU9+QQyWkjiuS5FEbBGFk1aU4AudhnDzJRD6E260NecWAd > U+DgzBPSMsRV4pm6j3SrnEsM5Z0e3t6gyXlaVSPuTd3lIiUBkRbayRvasXKDtsUP > LtiHu/M5UM1ehpn6DlAV > =Aw6t > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Pax et bonum. Jorge Araya Navarro. ES: Dise?ador Publicitario, Programador Python y colaborador en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre EN: Ads Designer, Python programmer and contributor Parabola GNU/Linux-libre EO: Anonco grafikisto, Pitino programalingvo programisto kai kontribuanto en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre https://es.gravatar.com/shackra From elcorreo at deshackra.com Sat Feb 21 03:19:04 2015 From: elcorreo at deshackra.com (Jorge Araya Navarro) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:19:04 -0600 Subject: [Dev] Transparency In-Reply-To: <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> References: <87egq1he0n.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D64D18.90605@gnu.org> <87r3ty7oyr.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <54D93A8B.5090609@riseup.net> <54D9B706.50901@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87pp94hrzg.fsf@abril.charola> hellekin writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 02/09/2015 07:54 PM, Andr? Silva wrote: >> On 02/09/2015 07:30 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: >> >>> ehr... sorry, i pressed the wrong emacs combination :P >> >>> what does everyone think about creating a list for parabola+ceata >>> communications, where everyone can read but only the delegate and >>> ceata can post? this, of course, to provide transparency in our >>> communications, and if someone wants to write any participant they >>> can do so in private, but it won't be an official communication. >> >> >> +1 Good idea! I agree because it provides a transparency communication >> for us and gives to the community a way to propose our ideas. >> > *** I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to promote "transparent > communication", and I certainly don't think it's relevant to advancing > the issue at this point. If the current proposal is accepted, fauno > will be the delegate, and how this is handled is an implementation > detail. Decision first, then implementation. > > If you insist on implementation, I'm for accountability, not > transparency, and certainly not to "everyone". It's important *for the > community* to be able to access tracking documents, but not for the > public. It's important *for the community* to be able to access > tracking documents *if necessary*, but having random people lurking and > bikeshedding at every step is going to wear out the delegate quite fast. > Accountability and TOFU. Privacy and freedom. Not transparency and > the tyranny of structurelessness. > > The delegate should come to the community with: > > - - understanding of the need of CEATA > - - a proposal to satisfy that need > > The community should provide the delegate with a clear response: > > - - yes, it's fine > - - yes with patches > - - no > > The delegate should go back to CEATA with: > > - - no, that need cannot be satisfied, but > - - with such and such changes it would work, or > - - yes, let's do it. > > This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque. The details > of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to > the process that is public otherwise. It's important to have a record > of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many voices > raised during a conversation. > > More importantly, it's a recipe for disaster. While you give attention > to this, you're not working on your own tasks. The goal is to deliver a > distro, not to micro-manage the delegate. > > My $0.02 > > == > hk > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU2bb+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 > ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9Nq0P/0aYOXFyb+pfWAgwQKwL4vJi > 1kwUb5+gLTYU+B5u8CCcBeLSvVQsrfbSiBX5WszcIGp+CtXPY7oftdleFxE6OUzq > eAnYGDoch+nayxEt0SE7PqMysaURfas3PYOeD/j89REIM5yRU6ptKBDB5STznmfD > Prn1axO/KLF3X+zpr2khaxeXrvmr1GrENgDy6DM1s8Hdn5kdpNsZ2zVq3tTg03x0 > gqA9hh1DGR8nhr0K+zbExx69MGVsHkHNBREvuXY5inc7RetkVk0Wq/jCH3kGKuvG > Zqm3RGl7nxzSug/zY6fBhS2eIUIimIhcb4X+0wdbT+stFIZAvRbWkgftp3W0akvL > IfXEU5r5qsdNfyDUbrkj0ZtolKlxJ0CgCB/6iCY5uwbsdAHF5gcES0fyd+ibwvAy > ppnuqSAXAQA1HeHsvCmueGmHqKQ6CQL+EpEvtVLO3dM4mqbsQJkIAAVm72qvNxhc > OYoQgRH4D7yG5Zc67ZI4EOOnmzHkMw5p3OlKpHcnWXP86o9vxyCIsLSfERVOpKhk > qTZYKrN4r9JURw/V81pMkV+D8+tlN4jACB9cA3WNOvzBioyr1y77dRSXcFaEMQFC > 5pQIyVD2XjffiX3JPk1viiU1Wjb/r9ytxAlu4zO+WsXz/mh/8AHK361Qy4/vP9BB > e0wB9tWVceX5kjZdSK14 > =n3Wf > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev at lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev Oh, well, you are actually right... -- Pax et bonum. Jorge Araya Navarro. ES: Dise?ador Publicitario, Programador Python y colaborador en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre EN: Ads Designer, Python programmer and contributor Parabola GNU/Linux-libre EO: Anonco grafikisto, Pitino programalingvo programisto kai kontribuanto en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre https://es.gravatar.com/shackra From emulatorman at riseup.net Sat Feb 21 15:05:36 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1256?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:05:36 -0200 Subject: [Dev] parabola for blind In-Reply-To: References: <54755EB0.2090103@riseup.net> <54756F86.9060405@riseup.net> <54770BB0.6020804@riseup.net> <548342BF.3030205@riseup.net> <20141208105836.f0a39e680837d738e9fec4c1@mailoo.org> Message-ID: <54E89EC0.3020902@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/09/2014 10:59 AM, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote: > it Do not talk after reboot > > 2014-12-08 5:58 ??????-08:00, Esteban Carnevale > : >> I installed a base Parabola system using this ISO. I did not test >> the audio. It worked without flaws. >> >> >> -- Esteban Carnevale >> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list >> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > > A new version of TalkingParabola has been released today. I've tested this version in my machine and works very well (speech support in the installation). Here is the link to download -> http://repo.parabola.nu/iso/talkingparabola/talkingparabola-2015.02.21-dual.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6J6qAAoJEOaXR1L5cERW5kYQAMG2o1CP7MCclRsLxvgM/mgf 5ARBep3r/2GBUiZKmlouxTrOALTwQOv1BEwDQMlyiqmBpkN59JUTbV20kZhX6Fnj 9OV5+1+MXilKiKz+xPAJ1Uq6F0i7zPpJhfJ7fYPRRpkGsFS1v8r7U5t3XUw2+tCp aHo+OWFtfuBlTY9yPlbsxXOaEe9BkiJb1nd6SpgXsCoV3//w7rn7Xo5FMiUyklDJ yVjQku2m9d72xvGyX5sv4zx3fgXfXf2tpUSS4hywXZwKZQAQjyBTmQCxFIlBCNFl I0PoqG85mY3z1vUk1IHlPpfV0QRzgVAyaXc36rRzoNe08uPYtkJVbaEo6N1U3nzs wjM9WDNcjzLl7rDt5loPC/4wQC4n2Ryptql1lXDR2R3/RSsZ5jlK7zDNx2Yjham6 QiV4sXhMLXtxFjsFkV7NhrORF8rl3kuwX20jwiId0XfUvWDyIebSZqmA1vjkEvuw zM9UzxyI/qkBpFs74zRjeZ17HP1gX0Q3q3YtzYJ8wilu/YkNb5jHDgQ1dqD1g/ZR uqZMOC/F9KIjvsZKFhIJBazPo3HO13ei3EOGMEIQZ4Qv/Gie0Q16SOlMsanS3OVY MQBYWP/ZAcK3cbUiqiW8dnmizBIbV8aP1DCkVHfvdD/VTZs4h85DJuEgMCANbP2e SbI/RaFJHvX8YM92lRZN =Jzx7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From blade.vp2020 at gmail.com Sun Feb 22 03:19:25 2015 From: blade.vp2020 at gmail.com (Ali Abdul Ghani) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 19:19:25 -0800 Subject: [Dev] parabola for blind In-Reply-To: <54E89EC0.3020902@riseup.net> References: <54755EB0.2090103@riseup.net> <54756F86.9060405@riseup.net> <54770BB0.6020804@riseup.net> <548342BF.3030205@riseup.net> <20141208105836.f0a39e680837d738e9fec4c1@mailoo.org> <54E89EC0.3020902@riseup.net> Message-ID: The same problem in step 6 https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch and it Do not talk after reboot 2015-02-21 7:05 ??????-08:00, Andr? Silva : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 12/09/2014 10:59 AM, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote: >> it Do not talk after reboot >> >> 2014-12-08 5:58 ??????-08:00, Esteban Carnevale >> : >>> I installed a base Parabola system using this ISO. I did not test >>> the audio. It worked without flaws. >>> >>> >>> -- Esteban Carnevale >>> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list >>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu >>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >> >> > > A new version of TalkingParabola has been released today. I've tested > this version in my machine and works very well (speech support in the > installation). > > Here is the link to download -> > http://repo.parabola.nu/iso/talkingparabola/talkingparabola-2015.02.21-dual.iso > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6J6qAAoJEOaXR1L5cERW5kYQAMG2o1CP7MCclRsLxvgM/mgf > 5ARBep3r/2GBUiZKmlouxTrOALTwQOv1BEwDQMlyiqmBpkN59JUTbV20kZhX6Fnj > 9OV5+1+MXilKiKz+xPAJ1Uq6F0i7zPpJhfJ7fYPRRpkGsFS1v8r7U5t3XUw2+tCp > aHo+OWFtfuBlTY9yPlbsxXOaEe9BkiJb1nd6SpgXsCoV3//w7rn7Xo5FMiUyklDJ > yVjQku2m9d72xvGyX5sv4zx3fgXfXf2tpUSS4hywXZwKZQAQjyBTmQCxFIlBCNFl > I0PoqG85mY3z1vUk1IHlPpfV0QRzgVAyaXc36rRzoNe08uPYtkJVbaEo6N1U3nzs > wjM9WDNcjzLl7rDt5loPC/4wQC4n2Ryptql1lXDR2R3/RSsZ5jlK7zDNx2Yjham6 > QiV4sXhMLXtxFjsFkV7NhrORF8rl3kuwX20jwiId0XfUvWDyIebSZqmA1vjkEvuw > zM9UzxyI/qkBpFs74zRjeZ17HP1gX0Q3q3YtzYJ8wilu/YkNb5jHDgQ1dqD1g/ZR > uqZMOC/F9KIjvsZKFhIJBazPo3HO13ei3EOGMEIQZ4Qv/Gie0Q16SOlMsanS3OVY > MQBYWP/ZAcK3cbUiqiW8dnmizBIbV8aP1DCkVHfvdD/VTZs4h85DJuEgMCANbP2e > SbI/RaFJHvX8YM92lRZN > =Jzx7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Think not of them, thou hast thy music too From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Sun Feb 22 22:51:45 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:51:45 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Community package [wine] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150222225145.402.40553@parabola.nu> bugmenot at bugmenot.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: out of date From emulatorman at riseup.net Sun Feb 22 23:36:10 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:36:10 -0200 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Community package [wine] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <20150222225145.402.40553@parabola.nu> References: <20150222225145.402.40553@parabola.nu> Message-ID: <54EA67EA.9040602@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/22/2015 08:51 PM, Parabola Website Notification wrote: > bugmenot at bugmenot.com wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > out of date > wine comes from Arch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6mfgAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWuiwQAOEocE0eTaACO5K+rZSI3DZH T4e8LSBRjE2q5mSFRr4+UyJpsJ2XGfw4ym8/MA/i6sOUoL1N8wSHxU0J1MsthieL OCsntY8FN3wDCqSFnB4kbS5sU+rVI32vW3DnT9w4xHtMULAb7cOVwNqcgZJOU1gu 6J8L4UYpuoraEfKrhAaJaG8FOYvjhMA5jkWmQ8AkAQ++/aEO2j/SMcxocLSLBnhg WlOSabBdRgMzHvkgGpP/F/EgA9yTFdgyL4l31n6MDTpkMY8PbbxJpEOBKJrg5Gej Hn0uGyOmOMkZH2ad+qAgi8TwQ0Qw+Xwz3k87Unego4ZGVjjuSIODsw7OasCE3Tnx 11aZfxo0lS1+rjomNo+UoUlCSiMoxBvXsTsxeF8Rju25YF0c0idPQfENyAq6MMni 8jbRWtlxQwohrO3O1zc/hfaJhlBxd4dCQwpT6gtPGenPuhEG/XPZG8pfKKSLtemj FjOE3NPtY0s6Ot9rP07Lu4CRiYrHH8amIA8B2e3ecPdgvAHCA6X325yPKvsZqKFx crJQsNDsqUyd64sze5U2mnb28SHh4NW8zI+o62yEG38HDpbbwu+h3OGkF9fRdIA3 qkaRNdBXakmSVspO/nC9xJdkIKd8VdJ/2ndfVDB7msOeY3dmGTlFqBUrqNcXtjBg R/Qcmgul1DvkGWxDBxkH =7oGm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Mon Feb 23 21:33:45 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:33:45 -0300 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Community package [wine] marked out-of-date In-Reply-To: <54EA67EA.9040602@riseup.net> References: <20150222225145.402.40553@parabola.nu> <54EA67EA.9040602@riseup.net> Message-ID: <878ufos47a.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Andr? Silva writes: > wine comes from Arch i wish mirrors had a push approach to upgrades :P -- http://vqfe4xmhxzi7w2uv.onion -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Tue Feb 24 02:42:32 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1256?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:42:32 -0200 Subject: [Dev] parabola for blind In-Reply-To: References: <54755EB0.2090103@riseup.net> <54756F86.9060405@riseup.net> <54770BB0.6020804@riseup.net> <548342BF.3030205@riseup.net> <20141208105836.f0a39e680837d738e9fec4c1@mailoo.org> <54E89EC0.3020902@riseup.net> Message-ID: <54EBE518.4010401@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/22/2015 01:19 AM, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote: > The same problem in step 6 > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch and it Do not > talk after reboot > Yesterday, coadde and me installed Parabola with the latest TalkingParabola in a lot of machines, but following our installation guide [0] instead of TalkingArch [1] and speaking support works well after reboot. In our installation guide there is a specific part when mention it [2], also about braille support [3]. [0]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide [1]:https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch [2]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide#Configure_speaking_support_.28for_blind_and_visually_impaired_users.29 [3]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide#Braille_Support -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6+UNAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWwc0P/jw3LB4vuQ1pv4YHMf8Hc1mR aOqIg512Wr2a6H9aG9yi3N9j8am4ODo4b/xdB+BFDTKoZ7EtubMyGC8BwL9ul63/ Uzq7oBq9N4wZhNyJtDwsbCifRXGM3XzRwU5Fxth1V1ZzYeP68fRtfnFVC+iXwHZY DLccCKUl5rPCXeq4igpxFURWrVb5jwxhKmJtwXqvuOWDKYYa+0iVRcUmBkpvsUtj 9Xi8IXCPmMwsYu2CxNaMacYAgy4zDclyBYATGNYmce+f0eBOJv7sKeO3hTjrKD50 pPTirNU9b40GG8rfUt2wONjFZGo7W+/ZgkJZ0jeAg2hIxtbuxysV1RnSK6gYsDqq CYPS5r6uuKqQXHZsw1W/Df+m4x6Tw5OTu5E/4mOf+PHo0mXHDpIAHPdRr5fD8JVK ug5UUonvqBLChW9M4yfzyn1Z9L4i82/xRG+cpEo6PnxGSNe2di9bpZlUqsGwFPk/ jR2LIc5dWvFytVXYcqo7e3k+wcxTRGxfuYxyMI3ncG7E6ap8K3Zq6k5Aw6zh9aXK SSdpnCrlJeMjtLRAxcBLMIGc59pnL5ATEZcBV5Td29FQ9fcFbEN/C44wMU7yzu41 sqXV+bXNukCeQ9lb/pyWD22PjKvmYvB0pUrB4hj4NvbVwvmUC3rJHgYKcmxr4t1T /wM/G+nHuSWXO5NHdM4z =BDao -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From blade.vp2020 at gmail.com Tue Feb 24 08:18:02 2015 From: blade.vp2020 at gmail.com (Ali Abdul Ghani) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:18:02 -0800 Subject: [Dev] parabola for blind In-Reply-To: <54EBE518.4010401@riseup.net> References: <54755EB0.2090103@riseup.net> <54756F86.9060405@riseup.net> <54770BB0.6020804@riseup.net> <548342BF.3030205@riseup.net> <20141208105836.f0a39e680837d738e9fec4c1@mailoo.org> <54E89EC0.3020902@riseup.net> <54EBE518.4010401@riseup.net> Message-ID: for me it Do not talk after reboot I find problem in step 6 I Followed https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch and The same problem in installation guide https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide 2015-02-23 18:42 ??????-08:00, Andr? Silva : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/22/2015 01:19 AM, Ali Abdul Ghani wrote: >> The same problem in step 6 >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch and it Do not >> talk after reboot >> > > Yesterday, coadde and me installed Parabola with the latest > TalkingParabola in a lot of machines, but following our installation > guide [0] instead of TalkingArch [1] and speaking support works well > after reboot. > In our installation guide there is a specific part when mention it > [2], also about braille support [3]. > > [0]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide > [1]:https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch > [2]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide#Configure_speaking_support_.28for_blind_and_visually_impaired_users.29 > [3]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Installation_guide#Braille_Support > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6+UNAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWwc0P/jw3LB4vuQ1pv4YHMf8Hc1mR > aOqIg512Wr2a6H9aG9yi3N9j8am4ODo4b/xdB+BFDTKoZ7EtubMyGC8BwL9ul63/ > Uzq7oBq9N4wZhNyJtDwsbCifRXGM3XzRwU5Fxth1V1ZzYeP68fRtfnFVC+iXwHZY > DLccCKUl5rPCXeq4igpxFURWrVb5jwxhKmJtwXqvuOWDKYYa+0iVRcUmBkpvsUtj > 9Xi8IXCPmMwsYu2CxNaMacYAgy4zDclyBYATGNYmce+f0eBOJv7sKeO3hTjrKD50 > pPTirNU9b40GG8rfUt2wONjFZGo7W+/ZgkJZ0jeAg2hIxtbuxysV1RnSK6gYsDqq > CYPS5r6uuKqQXHZsw1W/Df+m4x6Tw5OTu5E/4mOf+PHo0mXHDpIAHPdRr5fD8JVK > ug5UUonvqBLChW9M4yfzyn1Z9L4i82/xRG+cpEo6PnxGSNe2di9bpZlUqsGwFPk/ > jR2LIc5dWvFytVXYcqo7e3k+wcxTRGxfuYxyMI3ncG7E6ap8K3Zq6k5Aw6zh9aXK > SSdpnCrlJeMjtLRAxcBLMIGc59pnL5ATEZcBV5Td29FQ9fcFbEN/C44wMU7yzu41 > sqXV+bXNukCeQ9lb/pyWD22PjKvmYvB0pUrB4hj4NvbVwvmUC3rJHgYKcmxr4t1T > /wM/G+nHuSWXO5NHdM4z > =BDao > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Think not of them, thou hast thy music too From fauno at endefensadelsl.org Wed Feb 25 17:07:31 2015 From: fauno at endefensadelsl.org (=?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:07:31 -0300 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed In-Reply-To: <874mqgz2zu.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <874mqgz2zu.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <87y4nlly24.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > >> for: >> >> * openswan >> * networkmanager-openswan >> * galera >> * mariadb-galera > > also: > > * knot > * libshout-idjc > * idjc > * gnupg1 * mosquitto -- }(:= -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 584 bytes Desc: not available URL: From emulatorman at riseup.net Wed Feb 25 17:19:07 2015 From: emulatorman at riseup.net (=?windows-1252?Q?Andr=E9_Silva?=) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:19:07 -0200 Subject: [Dev] x86_64 packagers needed In-Reply-To: <87y4nlly24.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> References: <87vbj0sftc.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <874mqgz2zu.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> <87y4nlly24.fsf@endefensadelsl.org> Message-ID: <54EE040B.6000006@riseup.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 02/25/2015 03:07 PM, Nicol?s Reynolds wrote: > Nicol?s Reynolds writes: > >> Nicol?s Reynolds writes: >> >>> for: >>> >>> * openswan * networkmanager-openswan * galera * mariadb-galera >> >> also: >> >> * knot * libshout-idjc * idjc * gnupg1 > > * mosquitto > pushed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU7gQKAAoJEOaXR1L5cERW0ZcP/1vwfYkiONxT1CbYkd0W1w+3 0h8qDpCzkoHLejXiaVtxulrqphtteBuFH/XaTGNhsfWH2BQ4V6y81bU4aL+CU1B/ bH7SO6k2XkpJSfvpqSTtlDh9iB4YfjcsgbNbRkqi15Dz2MVQamPJfiGgo8p6bhwT 16+THgEMP8ZTN+r6bEiFQ34Z6uaIba4Tg15xzLG1fWCqIznjDK3gKQFvTV7LvdJv ctqHj8vs/4qICVRt91QQBf0dzxN1FphqV88TYT4DgOzJ8C0bGfsI3LSohEOmzooW 0rxL69HcKrvs7wlGSWXQppC08P6EHWzkdWO39z3pvTiAr2Q3xpWrQJTCxgkbNmd6 c5I+1mWvI2/0nrRs689aHdqbgEKhwuBZGLnLcg21MQ8oEgMI69EficzucpndFjV0 yYogu9f7eoWWwJ111/mKe4Dywfzc8ol3Q1iX0pBdiUw7migBjKarNHSDIMMYIqrk mgMVi2amj+HvBJL73K0vdVvB9Ipu8G2Vb5I5kUu5qumABBH6SOah32LD5ecfkgYB p+invZim18U07pLR+Wt2UJGo+4U7+haKHo8Pmu9j0qS/rrAJfrUVT9XTitTJ0Kao ncageYnoFrD+QmrdVhvosiRwgwJTsuNtfz6B8GXP5eVqGlEm1Ka7foF03UJZW+re 3vy1/QS7UAT8kX1sZlM5 =hgyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From nobody at repo.parabola.nu Fri Feb 27 08:16:33 2015 From: nobody at repo.parabola.nu (Parabola Website Notification) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:16:33 -0000 Subject: [Dev] Orphan Kernels package [linux-libre-rt] marked out-of-date Message-ID: <20150227081633.389.46253@parabola.nu> biserangeloff at gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.18/ (patch2 is available)