[Dev] Fwd: First Reproducible Builds Summit
isacdaavid at isacdaavid.info
Fri Dec 11 01:02:22 GMT 2015
I would say we should keep an eye on Arch, we depend on them. There's
some hope given fauno's OP
Le jeu. 10 déc. 2015 à 17:51, Josh Branning
<lovell.joshyyy at gmail.com> a écrit :
> On 10/12/15 19:42, Isaac David wrote:
>> Le jeu. 10 déc. 2015 à 9:16, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
>> <GNUtoo at no-log.org>
>> a écrit :
>>> [Arch Linux](https://www.archlinux.org/), What is its status?
>> It wasn't promising last time fauno forwarded an email by Allan McRae
>> from the Arch mailing lists:
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
> I guess if people have enough time, it's still worth pursuing. The
> people at Debian had issues getting as far as they did too.
> (ironically, I had issues searching their www bug-tracker interface)
> Personally, I'd be happy even if just the packages that create the
> iso were reproducible, the rest could be built by the user from
> source (and a local repository).
> Of course it is easy for me to say this, but I don't actively develop
> But if I get round to it, I will have a go. I would like to try the
> cross-compiling route at some point anyway. That's unless someone
> beats me to it. ;)
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dev