[Dev] Fwd: First Reproducible Builds Summit

[Isaac David]

I would say we should keep an eye on Arch, we depend on them. There's 
some hope given fauno's OP

Le jeu. 10 déc. 2015 à 17:51, Josh Branning 
<lovell.joshyyy at gmail.com> a écrit :
> On 10/12/15 19:42, Isaac David wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Le jeu. 10 déc. 2015 à 9:16, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli 
>> <GNUtoo at no-log.org>
>> a écrit :
>>> [Arch Linux](https://www.archlinux.org/), What is its status?
>> 
>> It wasn't promising last time fauno forwarded an email by Allan McRae
>> from the Arch mailing lists:
>> https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2015-August/003182.html
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
>> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
>> 
> 
> I guess if people have enough time, it's still worth pursuing. The 
> people at Debian had issues getting as far as they did too.
> 
> https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=debian%20timestamp%20bug%20reproducible
> 
> (ironically, I had issues searching their www bug-tracker interface)
> 
> Personally, I'd be happy even if just the packages that create the 
> iso were reproducible, the rest could be built by the user from 
> source (and a local repository).
> 
> Of course it is easy for me to say this, but I don't actively develop 
> parabola.
> 
> But if I get round to it, I will have a go. I would like to try the 
> cross-compiling route at some point anyway. That's unless someone 
> beats me to it. ;)
> 
> 
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.parabola.nu
> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20151210/081abe33/attachment.htm>