[Dev] [donations] [due 2015-04-20] draft of agreement with ceata

[hellekin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 04/15/2015 01:31 PM, Icarious wrote:
>> In my opinion, i think we could have a "vice delegate" for specific
>> cases if the main one isn't available, also she/he could be the next
>> successor and that period could learn about all related to the main
>> delegate functionality.
> 
> +1. That sounds good. Specially the "learning the role" part
> 
*** Agreed.  However, like backups, you would need two in different
places.  More seriously, I think we should keep the contract between
Ceata and *one* delegate.  How the community handles the delegate,
vice-delegate, backup vice-delegate, etc. should be a problem of the
community, not Ceata.

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=dBR3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----