[Dev] [donations] [due 2015-04-20] draft of agreement with ceata

[André Silva]

On 04/15/2015 10:07 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
> Nicolás Reynolds would act as a founder (which he is) and we all trust
> him. We only have to figure out what happens when he isn't available to
> appoint a new Delegate (he is lost on an island, he is in a comma, he
> dies, etc). We can add a clause to be possible for the incumbent
> Delegate and Ceata to void this agreement and sign a new one between
> her/him and Ceata; if Nicolás Reynolds doesn't respond to Ceata for 2
> months, the Delegate can step in. My head hurts. :-)
> 
> Does it make sense to go this way?
> 
In my opinion, i think we could have a "vice delegate" for specific
cases if the main one isn't available, also she/he could be the next
successor and that period could learn about all related to the main
delegate functionality.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20150415/d997cb78/attachment.sig>