[Dev] Suggestion for including [libre-multilib] repo

Nicolás Reynolds fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
Tue Jan 28 16:37:58 GMT 2014

"Luke T. Shumaker" <lukeshu at sbcglobal.net> writes:

> At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:15:04 -0200,
> André Silva wrote:
>> Hi guys, some time ago i thought add a new repo for our libre multilib
>> packages on our distro. If you pay attention, multilib packages are
>> disabled by default and our libre multilib packages needs it to works,
>> so i think that we should separate it to a new repo called
>> [libre-multilib] and keep it disabled together [multilib] repo on
>> pacman.conf, if an user would use multilib packages, so should enable
>> libre-multilib and multilib repos to use it, and so we avoid merge our
>> packages (common and multilib packages) in the same repo.
>> So guys, i would to know you opinion about it.
> I strongly support this!  However, I am unsure whether I think it
> should be called [libre-multilib] or [multilib-libre].

prefix for repos and sufix for packages?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140128/b5822c86/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dev mailing list