[Dev] [RFC] Voting about package naming for packages modified from Arch

[Daniel Milewski]

I vote for mtjm's proposal:

>  3) Don't ever use the -libre suffix (mtjm)
> 
>     Because all packages on [libre] have implicitly been modified for
>     freedom.

I agree with most of the arguments raised on behalf of this option:

* It doesn't make sense to have `-libre` suffix in package names if the
distro is completely free software.
* Name changes are unnecessarily complex and don't follow the KISS rule.

I'm also a bit annoyed by the fact I have to guess if the package was
renamed in Parabola whenever I install software through pacman.

-- 
Daniel Milewski
GPG key ID: 8D43A4A1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/attachments/20140829/4eee94cd/attachment.sig>