[Dev] [RFC] Voting about package naming for packages modified from Arch

André Silva emulatorman at riseup.net
Fri Aug 29 01:42:08 GMT 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The topic is basically "should we add '-libre' and '-parabola' to a
certain package name built by us on [libre], [libre-testing] and
[libre-multilib] repos?"
Some days ago lukeshu put a similar topic about it [0], but due which
to some users don't like the current package naming, i've propose
reopen it to decide a definitive way to solve the package naming for
packages modified from Arch from a voting to follow the 3th point of
our Social Contract [1].

[0]:
https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/pipermail/dev/2014-August/002290.html
[1]: https://wiki.parabolagnulinux.org/Parabola/GNU_Linux_Social_Contract

The following 4 suggestions have been offered:

 1) Add the -libre suffix to all packages that are modified from Arch
    for freedom reasons (so not for rebranding reasons). (fauno)

    lukeshu: Why "except for rebranding"?

 2) Add the -libre suffix on packages for patched-source software.
    (lukeshu)

    lukeshu: Because the name "${pkgbase}-libre" denotes that it is a
    fork of "${pkgbase}" that is maintained by the Parabola project,
    similar to Iceweasel being maintained by Debian, or Linux-libre by
    GNU/the FSFLA.

 3) Don't ever use the -libre suffix (mtjm)

    Because all packages on [libre] have implicitly been modified for
    freedom.

 4) Use -libre for patched-source software, and -parabola
    for packaging or configuration changes. (coadde)

    The "-libre" policy from #2, plus using another suffix to
    differentiate between Arch's version and Parabola's version to
    avoid confusion when migrating.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Byie
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Dev mailing list