[Dev] Vim plugin packages inspection

[André Silva]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/05/2014 03:33 PM, Daniel Milewski wrote:
> I did an inspection and I found several problems with Vim plugin 
> packages included in Parabola repositories. Some of the problems
> are less of an issue (like wrong license specification or wrong
> license file included), however there are few packages which are
> non-free (they don't carry an explicit free license).
> 
> I've made a summary listing the issues. Also, for the packages
> with wrong license specification I pointed out the correct one.
> 
> Free: * vim-bufexplorer[1][2][a] * vim-jedi[1][b] * vim-netrw[2] *
> vim-syntastic[1][c] * vim-ultisnips[1][d] * vimpager[1][2][a]
> 
Those packages should be reported to Arch, because are free but need
fix wrong license only

> Non-free: * vim-ctrlp[1][3] * vim-doxygentoolkit[1][3] *
> vim-guicolorscheme[1][3] * vim-jad[2][3] * vim-omnicppcomplete[3] *
> vim-pastie[1][3] * vim-systemd[1][3] * vim-workspace[3]
> 
> Other: * vim-project[4]
> 
I will add it to the blacklist, thanks for the report!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=7f1A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----